Revision as of 23:35, 11 March 2015 editWowee Zowee public (talk | contribs)316 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:59, 12 March 2015 edit undoWowee Zowee public (talk | contribs)316 edits ok, your choice to inflict pain and an iron fist win.Next edit → | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Delta Airlines Flight 1086== | ==Delta Airlines Flight 1086== | ||
The better the shape the article is in, the easier it is to show that ] is met. Have a look at the ] article and you will see that there is an infobox and the article has a defined structure. Bare urls are not good either. {{tl|infobox aircraft occurrence}} is the infobox template. {{tl|cite web}} is the template to cite websites. Use <nowiki><ref name=xxxx>{{cite web |url= |title= |publisher= |accessdate=}}</ref></nowiki> at minimum (you can copy and paste this). Other parameters may be added as required. ] (]) 20:52, 10 March 2015 (UTC) | The better the shape the article is in, the easier it is to show that ] is met. Have a look at the ] article and you will see that there is an infobox and the article has a defined structure. Bare urls are not good either. {{tl|infobox aircraft occurrence}} is the infobox template. {{tl|cite web}} is the template to cite websites. Use <nowiki><ref name=xxxx>{{cite web |url= |title= |publisher= |accessdate=}}</ref></nowiki> at minimum (you can copy and paste this). Other parameters may be added as required. ] (]) 20:52, 10 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
== March 2015 == | |||
] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br> | |||
Please be particularly aware that ] states: | |||
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''. | |||
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | |||
In particular, editors should be aware of the ], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, '''breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a ]'''. | |||
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-ew --> <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">— ] // ] // ] // </small> 20:31, 11 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' for ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the ] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">— ] // ] // ] // </small> 20:49, 11 March 2015 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> | |||
:The warning wasn't a message, it was a warning. Please stop removing warning templates from your userpage. It prevents uninvolved admins from being kept up to date. <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">— ] // ] // ] // </small> 20:51, 11 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
{{unblock reviewed | 1=This action is totally unjustified because I have shown great restraint. I have explained myself for hours and have held back the temptation to edit. In contrast, Coffee keeps slapping the same notice on my user talk page. This shows bad judgment by escalating, not de-escalating the situation. If unblocked, I will remain calm, even become calmer. By doing so, you will maintain order in WP, not try to create mayhem. As far as edit warring, Betty Logan reported me to the AN3 board but another editor came to my defense. That person (Jetstreamer) is not my friend but actually disagrees with me in an AFD but we are both civil and respectful. Since there is no edit warring, please delete Coffee's actions and unblock. Thank you. I will repay your kindness by making your action seem wise (i.e. I will act with the utmost respect and responsibility) | decline=You were clearly edit warring, for days. While you did discuss on the talk page you failed to gain consensus and continued to edit war. Your unblock request and subsequent comment seem to indicate you blame Coffee for this block. You have not indicated that you will stop edit warring, you were not blocked for lack of calmness. I suggest you wait out this block, if you do decide to make another unblock request please read ] and consider that taking some personal responsibility would go a lot farther than blaming others. ] 21:03, 11 March 2015 (UTC)}} | |||
Coffee, if you unblock me, it will show you are wise because I will be very respectful and act to show that your unblock was wise. Take up this offer because most Wikipedians are not so calm as I am. Having an iron fist may make you feel strong but is not the best way in this case. ] (]) 20:56, 11 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
Coffee says that I must keep his message up to keep uninvolved admins up to date. If you want to be up to date, know that the dispute started when Betty Logan attacked me. She/he wants a sanitized, whitewashed, 100% positive Sound of Music article while I wanted to convey that, according to reliable sources, they had a hard time finding a director because the industry thought the film was garbage. The nice thing was the public loved it. WP readers benefit in knowing this. | |||
Burt Lancaster said "Jesus, you must need the money". Another director chased the screenwriter out of his house saying that he didn't want to director this kind of shit. | |||
I have made many suggestions on different ways to say it and tone it down and make it neutral but to the hatred of Betty Logan. ] (]) 21:00, 11 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
Chillum, thank you for reviewing this. If you unblock me, you will be doing the right thing. I will give you honor by acting in the utmost upright way. This is the optimal WP way. The common WP way is to be harsh, but that just makes people mad creates drama. ] (]) 21:02, 11 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
Chillum, please unblock. I will take your advice 100%. But please unblock. Your kindness in this way will be repaid many times over. Act with an iron fist and that is not what I request. I am sorry that I made you mad by the way I edited. I will work hard to not do it and won't. | |||
Oh, blocks are to prevent disruption, not punishment. If you unblock, I guarantee that I will not disrupt. Therefore, please unblock. Thank you. ] (]) 21:07, 11 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
{{unblock|To Chillum or others.Chillum, please unblock. I will take your advice 100%. But please unblock. Your kindness in this way will be repaid many times over. Act with an iron fist and that is not what I request. I am sorry that I made you mad by the way I edited. I will work hard to not do it and won't. | |||
Oh, blocks are to prevent disruption, not punishment. If you unblock, I guarantee that I will not disrupt. Therefore, please unblock. Thank you.. | |||
Oh, I also take 1000% responsibility. I am a worthless piece of shit that should be lynched and killed. }} | |||
What exactly do you mean by iron fist and and being repaid? Are you trying some sort of carrot/stick approach here? ] 22:29, 11 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
::What I mean is that I ask you not to be harsh and act with an iron fist. About being repaid, I mean that goodwill and kindness will be reciprocated in terms of good and careful editing (as well as encouragement to act civilly and nicely to all in WP) so it is for the better of Misplaced Pages. | |||
::Think about if the police stop you. For the sake of argument, say you were speeding slightly. Would you prefer getting a warning or a pep talk or for the police to say "you broke the law, I am taking you to jail where you will spend a few hours calling a lawyer, paying for your car to be towed, etc." That may be legal but is heavy handed. ] (]) 23:11, 11 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
Not really an accurate comparison. This would be more like if the police warned you to stop speeding but you kept speeding anyways and then they busted you. ] 23:15, 11 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
::::When I wrote that analogy, I was a little concerned because that analogy was not correct. Basically, show a little sympathy and it will be a sign of goodwill, which I will greatly reciprocate to all of Misplaced Pages. Do not try to be tough. Do not try to punish, as this is not what blocking is for. It is to prevent disruption. I promise you that I will do good and not a bit of disruption if you unblock me now rather than make me suffer. The choice is yours......iron fist or not. Thank you. ] (]) 23:35, 11 March 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:59, 12 March 2015
Welcome!
Hello, Wowee Zowee public, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to World AIDS Day. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Misplaced Pages
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 18:35, 1 December 2014 (UTC) Sam Walton (talk) 21:53, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
Delta Airlines Flight 1086
The better the shape the article is in, the easier it is to show that WP:GNG is met. Have a look at the Villa Castelli helicopter crash article and you will see that there is an infobox and the article has a defined structure. Bare urls are not good either. {{infobox aircraft occurrence}} is the infobox template. {{cite web}} is the template to cite websites. Use <ref name=xxxx>{{cite web |url= |title= |publisher= |accessdate=}}</ref> at minimum (you can copy and paste this). Other parameters may be added as required. Mjroots (talk) 20:52, 10 March 2015 (UTC)