| Revision as of 21:54, 12 March 2015 editQPT (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers4,235 edits →User:Bryce Carmony being WP:POINTY?: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:59, 12 March 2015 edit undoBryce Carmony (talk | contribs)2,039 edits →User:Bryce Carmony being WP:POINTY?: Explain NPOV mergersNext edit → | ||
| Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
| He's been every "Criticism of..." article into that article, even when the "Criticism of..." article is than the main one. As the last admin to block him, could you look at this? ]<sup>]]</sup> 21:54, 12 March 2015 (UTC) | He's been every "Criticism of..." article into that article, even when the "Criticism of..." article is than the main one. As the last admin to block him, could you look at this? ]<sup>]]</sup> 21:54, 12 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
| Hello 5 Albert square, allow me to clarify a few things. I'm not actually trying to merge all "Criticism of" articles. some articles make a lot of sense to have criticism for example "Film criticism" or "Literary criticism". Makes total sense. I am only proposing mergers for articles that have divisions based on POV. for example ] is just ] but with a different POV. In the name of NPOV I am not moving or merging any content I am just starting the process and recommending merges on a few articles. if you have any questions I'm happy to answer them. ] (]) 21:58, 12 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:59, 12 March 2015
 Archives |
|
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 2 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
|
It is approximately 1:22 AM where this user lives (Newcastle upon Tyne). |
| Today is Tuesday, 24 December 2024, and the current time is 01:22 (UTC/GMT). There are currently 6,928,965 articles. Purge this page for a new update. |
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Hi everyone
Welcome to my talk page!
 | Read first! Welcome to my talk page! Questions, information, warnings? Say it here! Please post new topic at the bottom of this page, please sign your topic with ~~~~. And remember, Assume good faith! Click here to start a new topic. |
If you post a message here then please add this page to your watchlist as I will reply here. If I ask you a question on your talk page then please reply on your talk page as I will be watching it.
Finally please remember to sign your signature using the 
button.
It's not vandalism
The pizza picture is not vandalism! You're vandalism! I quit! Goodbye! And good night! — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheSimpsonsStuff (talk • contribs)
User
Hi,
As you're a wonderful admin user, and you joined way back, I wanted to ask you can you block this anomoys user, he keeps editing these pages that are incorrect. Would you please block him. Thank You Kris, Victoria = 5 (talk) 06:22, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- Who?--5 albert square (talk) 20:08, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- I'm curious why the above user in these edits faked the addition of a Good Friend Award to his own talk page as though it came from User:OnlyOneRaider. As we can see from the edit history at Kris's talk page OnlyOneRaider never added it. The user also refactored the warning from @Lightsout: in the same batch by removing the info icon. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:57, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
User
Hi my names Leon I can't do an actual reference to a website as in from out of this weeks magazine for the east enders characters — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drleonnorman (talk • contribs) 11:23, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- If you can't reference it then please do not add it. All additions to the EastEnders articles must be reliably referenced so the edits can be verified. Please take time to read our policies.--5 albert square (talk) 19:54, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
List of residences in EastEnders
Hi i have noticed you previously disallowed anyone editing with an IP address due to vandalism on this article Misplaced Pages:WikiProject EastEnders/List of residences in EastEnders. Can you please reinforce this as vandalism is taking place again. Thanks Kelvin 101 (talk) 14:39, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, there isn't enough recent vandalism to warrant protection. I will keep an eye on the page, if it goes up to the level of vandalism that I disabled editing for last time, I won't hesitate to do it again! --5 albert square (talk) 20:01, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 March 2015
- Special report: An advance look at the WMF's fundraising survey
- In the media: Gamergate; a Wiki hoax; Kanye West
- Featured content: Here they come, the couple plighted –
- Op-ed: Why the Core Contest matters
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:25, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
User:Bryce Carmony being WP:POINTY?
He's been trying to merge every "Criticism of..." article into that article, even when the "Criticism of..." article is longer than the main one. As the last admin to block him, could you look at this? Origamite 21:54, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello 5 Albert square, allow me to clarify a few things. I'm not actually trying to merge all "Criticism of" articles. some articles make a lot of sense to have criticism for example "Film criticism" or "Literary criticism". Makes total sense. I am only proposing mergers for articles that have divisions based on POV. for example Criticism of Windows is just Windows but with a different POV. In the name of NPOV I am not moving or merging any content I am just starting the process and recommending merges on a few articles. if you have any questions I'm happy to answer them. Bryce Carmony (talk) 21:58, 12 March 2015 (UTC)