Misplaced Pages

User talk:Inicholson: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:49, 10 March 2015 editTransporterMan (talk | contribs)Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, Mass message senders, Pending changes reviewers23,031 edits DRN filing: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 17:19, 14 March 2015 edit undoWowee Zowee public (talk | contribs)316 edits SAE: new sectionNext edit →
Line 16: Line 16:


Just letting you know that I closed your DRN request to have you go back and list additional participants, but then reopened it after I realized that it was not about the section in general but only the section header, a dispute only currently involving the two of you. I'm saying this because I didn't want you to see the closure and think that the listing is gone: it ''was'' gone for a couple of minutes, but ''now'' it's back. I've notified the other editor of the filing. Regards, ] (]) 15:49, 10 March 2015 (UTC) (DRN volunteer) <small>{{H:title|This is an informational posting only and I am not watching this page|(Not watching)|link=no|dotted=yes}}</small> Just letting you know that I closed your DRN request to have you go back and list additional participants, but then reopened it after I realized that it was not about the section in general but only the section header, a dispute only currently involving the two of you. I'm saying this because I didn't want you to see the closure and think that the listing is gone: it ''was'' gone for a couple of minutes, but ''now'' it's back. I've notified the other editor of the filing. Regards, ] (]) 15:49, 10 March 2015 (UTC) (DRN volunteer) <small>{{H:title|This is an informational posting only and I am not watching this page|(Not watching)|link=no|dotted=yes}}</small>

== SAE ==

You mention about having a SAE section heading. I have something similar. There is an article, ]. Two editors seem to own the article. They seem to want to hide that the film had a hard time finding a director. If you have any opinion, you can express them on that talk page. If not, ok.

One famous director chased the screenwriter out of his house saying "Go find someone else to direct this shit". Burt Lancaster remarked "Jesus, you must need the money!" Other directors seemed to have just declined. If this amount of detail is reported, you can be sure it is noteworthy. ] (]) 17:19, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:19, 14 March 2015

Welcome

File:Verifiability and Neutral point of view (Common Craft)-en.ogv
A video showing the basics of verifiability and neutral point of view policies.

Welcome!

Hello, Inicholson, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Misplaced Pages and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  - Ahunt (talk) 19:56, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

DRN filing

Just letting you know that I closed your DRN request to have you go back and list additional participants, but then reopened it after I realized that it was not about the section in general but only the section header, a dispute only currently involving the two of you. I'm saying this because I didn't want you to see the closure and think that the listing is gone: it was gone for a couple of minutes, but now it's back. I've notified the other editor of the filing. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 15:49, 10 March 2015 (UTC) (DRN volunteer) This is an informational posting only and I am not watching this page

SAE

You mention about having a SAE section heading. I have something similar. There is an article, The Sound of Music (film). Two editors seem to own the article. They seem to want to hide that the film had a hard time finding a director. If you have any opinion, you can express them on that talk page. If not, ok.

One famous director chased the screenwriter out of his house saying "Go find someone else to direct this shit". Burt Lancaster remarked "Jesus, you must need the money!" Other directors seemed to have just declined. If this amount of detail is reported, you can be sure it is noteworthy. Wowee Zowee public (talk) 17:19, 14 March 2015 (UTC)