Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Self-contradiction: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:06, 22 July 2006 editXyzzyplugh (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers19,952 edits []: comment← Previous edit Revision as of 02:08, 22 July 2006 edit undoUncle G (talk | contribs)Administrators52,482 edits I am reminded.Next edit →
Line 3: Line 3:


*AI created the article in view of apparent need for it to exist - there was a link to it AI noticed while browsing semiotics related articles (IIRC) and it was marked red (a double bracketed term leading to non-existing article). It can surely be improved and various terms might need further explanation or maybe I lack proper scientific vocabulary for some concepts and therefore you think these are some invented or taken out of the hat terms. You stated it well - it ''seems'' to be a personal essay, just like you ''seem'' to me to be a newbie who recently read the deletion policy and is in overzealous stage. Oh,BTW - your sentence is self-contradictory - every article on Misplaced Pages written by a single person is a personal essay on some subject. There are new technologies appearing every day - are you going to delete articles aboot them on a notion that they constitute a description of original thought? Again, self-contradiction. Fortunately, I managed to define it, although it should be impossible by definition to define self-contradiction. I guess there is more in me than it ''seems'' to. Listen to the song "As A Child" by "Suzanne Vega" (or read the lyrics on vega.net) to get my point even harder. Milk and kisses! 01:35, 22 July 2006 (UTC){{unsigned|Agquarx}} *AI created the article in view of apparent need for it to exist - there was a link to it AI noticed while browsing semiotics related articles (IIRC) and it was marked red (a double bracketed term leading to non-existing article). It can surely be improved and various terms might need further explanation or maybe I lack proper scientific vocabulary for some concepts and therefore you think these are some invented or taken out of the hat terms. You stated it well - it ''seems'' to be a personal essay, just like you ''seem'' to me to be a newbie who recently read the deletion policy and is in overzealous stage. Oh,BTW - your sentence is self-contradictory - every article on Misplaced Pages written by a single person is a personal essay on some subject. There are new technologies appearing every day - are you going to delete articles aboot them on a notion that they constitute a description of original thought? Again, self-contradiction. Fortunately, I managed to define it, although it should be impossible by definition to define self-contradiction. I guess there is more in me than it ''seems'' to. Listen to the song "As A Child" by "Suzanne Vega" (or read the lyrics on vega.net) to get my point even harder. Milk and kisses! 01:35, 22 July 2006 (UTC){{unsigned|Agquarx}}
::Please read ]. We can have articles on new technologies, once they have been written about elsewhere in ]. Misplaced Pages summarizes knowledge available elsewhere, we don't create anything new as that is not the purpose of an encylopedia. --] 02:06, 22 July 2006 (UTC) **Please read ]. We can have articles on new technologies, once they have been written about elsewhere in ]. Misplaced Pages summarizes knowledge available elsewhere, we don't create anything new as that is not the purpose of an encylopedia. --] 02:06, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' OR. Nom is right. ] 01:38, 22 July 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' OR. Nom is right. ] 01:38, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
*I can almost hear ] saying "Deep Thoughts". This article cites no sources, and presents a completely idiosyncratic view of the topic. There's probably an encyclopaedia article to be had on this subject, but this most certainly is not it. Nor is it a decent stub that can be expanded. '''Delete''' and let the redlinks stand. ] 01:53, 22 July 2006 (UTC) *I can almost hear ] saying "Deep Thoughts". This article cites no sources, and presents a completely idiosyncratic view of the topic. There's probably an encyclopaedia article to be had on this subject, but this most certainly is not it. Nor is it a decent stub that can be expanded. '''Delete''' and let the redlinks stand. ] 01:53, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
**I am reminded of ], ], ], and ]. ] 02:08, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' violates ] --] 02:01, 22 July 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' violates ] --] 02:01, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:08, 22 July 2006

Self-contradiction

Misplaced Pages is not a publisher of original thought - This seems to be a personal essay Neilajh 00:52, 22 July 2006 (UTC)