| Revision as of 14:56, 7 November 2013 editJust Tidying Up (talk | contribs)451 edits →Invitation to participate at Stalking Cat: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:48, 23 March 2015 edit undoTheRedPenOfDoom (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers135,756 edits →Gamergate sanctions notice: new sectionTag: contentious topics alertNext edit → | ||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
| Hello, I'm ]. I'm commenting because, at some point in the past, you contributed to the ] article or talk page. I recently performed a major rewrite of ], and I am interested to increase further expansion and improvement of the article, with other editors. If you are interested in this topic, please join us at ]. Thank you. ] (]) 14:56, 7 November 2013 (UTC) | Hello, I'm ]. I'm commenting because, at some point in the past, you contributed to the ] article or talk page. I recently performed a major rewrite of ], and I am interested to increase further expansion and improvement of the article, with other editors. If you are interested in this topic, please join us at ]. Thank you. ] (]) 14:56, 7 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == Gamergate sanctions notice == | |||
| {{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.'' | |||
| '''Please carefully read this information:''' | |||
| The Arbitration Committee has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ]. | |||
| Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | |||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> -- ] 17:48, 23 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:48, 23 March 2015
Welcome!
Hello, TiagoTiago, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 06:05, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Transcrição da pronúncia de Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva
Olá, Tiago!
Sobre a pronúncia, meus conhecimentos me indicam que a transcrição que mais se adequa é: . Sobre a pronúncia da preposição "da", no Brasil pronunciamos .
Retirei o seguinte trecho dessa página: http://en.wikipedia.org/Open_front_unrounded_vowel
Most languages have some form of an unrounded open vowel. For languages that only have a single low vowel, the symbol for this vowel <a> may be used because it is the only low vowel whose symbol is part of the basic Latin alphabet. Whenever marked as such, the vowel is closer to a central than to a front .
Por isso considero mais adequado marcar com o diacrítico que diz que a vogal é central.
Tenha um bom dia! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aramaicus (talk • contribs) 19:04, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Furry fandom
Hello, TiagoTiago.
See here and here. Nice reply in any case. :) RP9 (talk) 22:36, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Re: Talk:Tremors:Appearance On Posters
The tentacle snake on the poster was actually the original concept of the grabiods. The original one was dry while the one in the movie was slimy. The producers changed it because the grabiods look better when slimy so it looked like that they were covered in nail varnish. - Rockmandrum (talk) 02:56, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Lux
Hi. I see that another user deleted your question from Talk:Lux. Try asking your question at the Science Reference Desk. Article talk pages are not forums for general questions or discussion about the subject of the articles; they are to be used for discussion focused on how to improve the article. The reference desks are the right place to ask for help or information.--Srleffler (talk) 06:44, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- With personal laser pointers and other laser devices being so common nowadays, i expected that such an information would be of interest of some of the people coming to the Lux page. Do you Disagree? --TiagoTiago (talk) 11:08, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- User:Dicklyon deleted your question, with the edit comment "Inappropriate forum-like question; take it to a forum." You could ask him about it.--Srleffler (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Opinion on inclusion of keys?
Hi, I noticed you participated in discussions on Talk:Texas Instruments signing key controversy in the past and now that there are the keys are restored wanted to get your opinion there of which keys if any should be included in the article. Please respond at Talk:Texas_Instruments_signing_key_controversy#The_keys. Thanks! Dcoetzee 07:00, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
IPBE
{{adminhelp|This user has contacted me and cannot edit see this. Please help him.}} ----Addihockey10 06:54, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
According to this link, the IP is a Tor node. For several reasons, we do not allow editing via Tor nodes. If you would like to discuss your situation, please return to #wikipedia-en-unblock and use the "!admin" keyword to get the attention of an admin. You may also submit a request via WP:UTRS. —DoRD (talk) 13:07, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- Seems my block has been lifted. Please let me know if there is anything else i need to do about this. Thanx. --TiagoTiago (talk) 02:50, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
Invitation to participate at Stalking Cat
Hello, I'm Just Tidying Up. I'm commenting because, at some point in the past, you contributed to the Stalking Cat article or talk page. I recently performed a major rewrite of Stalking Cat, and I am interested to increase further expansion and improvement of the article, with other editors. If you are interested in this topic, please join us at Talk:Stalking_Cat#Major_rewrite. Thank you. Just Tidying Up (talk) 14:56, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Gamergate sanctions notice
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Template:Z33 -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:48, 23 March 2015 (UTC)