Revision as of 09:25, 25 March 2015 editSchroCat (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers113,150 edits →"they're worse than the vandals"← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:12, 25 March 2015 edit undoRodw (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers769,333 edits →Another list of Somerset scheduled monuments at FLC: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
Any chance you and page stalkers could give this a read and post some feedback on the talk page. It gets over one million hits a year and I really think it would be good to get up to FA status. It needs to be treated as fairly as other articles, I think we can get it up to FA status with some decent input.♦ ] 20:32, 24 March 2015 (UTC) | Any chance you and page stalkers could give this a read and post some feedback on the talk page. It gets over one million hits a year and I really think it would be good to get up to FA status. It needs to be treated as fairly as other articles, I think we can get it up to FA status with some decent input.♦ ] 20:32, 24 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
== Another list of Somerset scheduled monuments at FLC == | |||
As you have previously commented on one or more of nominations of the lists of ], I wondered if you would be kind enough to take a look at the ] which is now nominated at ]?— ] <sup>]</sup> 21:12, 25 March 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:12, 25 March 2015
Please leave a message; I'll reply here.
Template:Archive box collapsible The Signpost: 18 March 2015
Misplaced Pages:Featured picture candidates/Rembrandt s-p, based on a Titian, among othersYes: it is allowable and beneficialIt reeks of a violation of WP:OWN, and it is wrong. I won't get into a petty revert war with you, but you are wrong on this. — Ched : ? 23:35, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
"they're worse than the vandals"No matter what you think of somebody's edits or admin actions, there is absolutely no excuse for comments like this. Please comment on content, not on contributors, and imagine how you would feel if somebody spoke to you like that if they felt you had made a mistake. If this conduct persists, regardless of it origin, I will request a second arbitration case on infoboxes in order to examine the conduct of all parties and with a view to asking ArbCom to authorise discretionary sanctions to curb the disruptive conduct. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:28, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Ah look, no "neutral" action taken against personal attacks by one side, but warnings dished out the other way. No surprises to anyone, sadly - SchroCat (talk) 09:25, 25 March 2015 (UTC) Shah Rukh KhanAny chance you and page stalkers could give this a read and post some feedback on the talk page. It gets over one million hits a year and I really think it would be good to get up to FA status. It needs to be treated as fairly as other articles, I think we can get it up to FA status with some decent input.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:32, 24 March 2015 (UTC) Another list of Somerset scheduled monuments at FLCAs you have previously commented on one or more of nominations of the lists of scheduled monuments in Somerset, I wondered if you would be kind enough to take a look at the List of scheduled monuments in West Somerset which is now nominated at Misplaced Pages:Featured list candidates/List of scheduled monuments in West Somerset/archive1?— Rod 21:12, 25 March 2015 (UTC) |