Misplaced Pages

:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Biology: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Featured portal candidates Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:47, 22 July 2006 editKirill Lokshin (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users75,365 edits []: Support← Previous edit Revision as of 13:37, 23 July 2006 edit undoRagesoss (talk | contribs)Administrators21,501 edits supportNext edit →
Line 15: Line 15:


I agree that a box for the major topics is a must. Once that gets added, I'll probably be ready to support it.--] 17:13, 15 July 2006 (UTC) I agree that a box for the major topics is a must. Once that gets added, I'll probably be ready to support it.--] 17:13, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
:Great work. '''Support'''.--] 13:37, 23 July 2006 (UTC)


Photo credits have been added. The major topics box is there, but needs some cosmetic changes over the coming few days. - ] (] • ]) 23:21, 18 July 2006 (UTC) Photo credits have been added. The major topics box is there, but needs some cosmetic changes over the coming few days. - ] (] • ]) 23:21, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:37, 23 July 2006

Portal:Biology

This portal has been around for a long time, receives regular updates, and has had a minor facelift and expansion recently with the addition of links to related portals and Mediawiki resources.

It's been a great portal for quite some time, but we've apparently never thought about nominating it, so here goes. Looking forward to your comments.

PS: Here is a version from February 2005, two weeks after it was created.

Samsara (talkcontribs) 11:07, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Object:
  • Selected picture needs an image credit.
  • No list of major topics.
  • The "Alternative categorization schemes" box seems quite useless, but that might just be personal preference.
Overall, though, quite good. Kirill Lokshin 16:19, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

I agree that a box for the major topics is a must. Once that gets added, I'll probably be ready to support it.--ragesoss 17:13, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Great work. Support.--ragesoss 13:37, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Photo credits have been added. The major topics box is there, but needs some cosmetic changes over the coming few days. - Samsara (talkcontribs) 23:21, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

I think he meant a photo credit like so. Joe I 05:17, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
The correct edit was made, just reverted. Joe I 10:17, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

I contacted Cyde about this yesterday, and he's definitely been "on", but hasn't replied, so I've put the photo credit back in. I hope it lasts. - Samsara (talkcontribs) 13:20, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Looks good; support from me now that the changes have been made. Kirill Lokshin 05:47, 22 July 2006 (UTC)