| Revision as of 19:53, 31 March 2015 editIronholds (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers79,705 edits →Wikiproject Insect: wat← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:08, 31 March 2015 edit undoMishae (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users85,764 edits →Wikiproject InsectNext edit → | ||
| Line 479: | Line 479: | ||
| :::::I wouldn't be nearly so blunt or nearly so horrified if this wasn't precisely the same way I'd seen you respond to every single concern about your contributions that anyone has surfaced; people try to engage and you aggressively fight them, even though you're pretty much always in the wrong, before assuming bad faith and declaring them to be a troll or a vandal or deserving of a block or, or, or. At no point have I seen you actually respond to criticism by reading policies before replying, or by agreeing that something is a problem; you fight and you fight and you accelerate it up to me and the only thing that happens, every time, is that it turns out you're wrong and you've wasted a ton of another contributor's time of energy in being wrong. | :::::I wouldn't be nearly so blunt or nearly so horrified if this wasn't precisely the same way I'd seen you respond to every single concern about your contributions that anyone has surfaced; people try to engage and you aggressively fight them, even though you're pretty much always in the wrong, before assuming bad faith and declaring them to be a troll or a vandal or deserving of a block or, or, or. At no point have I seen you actually respond to criticism by reading policies before replying, or by agreeing that something is a problem; you fight and you fight and you accelerate it up to me and the only thing that happens, every time, is that it turns out you're wrong and you've wasted a ton of another contributor's time of energy in being wrong. | ||
| :::::You want to know what I think of this situation, after every other situation you've pinged me about? Here's what I think. I think that if you don't seriously adjust how you respond to users acting in good faith and trying to correct your mistakes, you're going to get blocked, because ]. I think that if you keep removing those tags, I'll start the block discussion myself. And I think that I'm going to go over to Kingofaces43's talkpage, now, and give them a barnstar, for being far more patient in dealing with this than most users. ] (]) 19:53, 31 March 2015 (UTC) | :::::You want to know what I think of this situation, after every other situation you've pinged me about? Here's what I think. I think that if you don't seriously adjust how you respond to users acting in good faith and trying to correct your mistakes, you're going to get blocked, because ]. I think that if you keep removing those tags, I'll start the block discussion myself. And I think that I'm going to go over to Kingofaces43's talkpage, now, and give them a barnstar, for being far more patient in dealing with this than most users. ] (]) 19:53, 31 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
| ::::::{{ping|Ironholds}} Thanks a lot! No really. I needed to agree that my edits were disruptive to show him a difference between his accusation of vandalism and this. In reality I don't think my edits were harmful to the project since user Gug01 thank me for such edits via notification. So, yes, in this case I am the injured party, because it was user Kingofaces43 who called my edits vandalistic, not the other way around. And I am being called that twice in my whole time being on Misplaced Pages. As far as competence goes, I am competent, but not in every field, and you know that.--] (]) 22:08, 31 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:08, 31 March 2015
 Archives | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Welcome!
Hello, Mishae, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like 4X4: Hummer, may not conform to some of Misplaced Pages's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted. thank you mishae for your contributions!:) THANKS FOR YOUR HELP!
Thank you.You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 01:52, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Carabus rustemi, Mishae!
Misplaced Pages editor Jackson Peebles just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for creating this, but do you have any more information on this species? You seem to be an expert, and I think a few more sentences would be a great contribution. Thanks again!
To reply, leave a comment on Jackson Peebles's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2013
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 6, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2013
Previous issue | Index | Next issue 
Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2013, the project has:
|
Content
|
|
Project Navigation
-
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
- Assessment – talk
- Cleanup – talk
- Peer review – talk
A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Melica mutica, Mishae!
Misplaced Pages editor Falkirks just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
I passed your article through review. It is short I look forward to seeing improvement. So far it looks great!
To reply, leave a comment on Falkirks's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Marilyn E. Jacox, Mishae!
Misplaced Pages editor Kudpung just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
reads like a list of awards. For a true biographical entry, this article really needs to be expanded with personal information, such as date and place of birth, education, and upbringing.
To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
A page you started (Konstantin Sidenko) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Konstantin Sidenko, Mishae!
Misplaced Pages editor Matty.007 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Looks good
To reply, leave a comment on Matty.007's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
New Article
The article is just called User:Completewasterscolin/sandbox but its about a comedian called John Kearns.
WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, October 2013
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 6, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2013
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2013, the project has:
|
Content
|
Project Navigation
-
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
- Assessment – talk
- Cleanup – talk
- Peer review – talk
WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Quarter 4, 2013
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 6, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2013
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2013, the project has:
|
Content
|
Project Navigation
-
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
- Assessment – talk
- Cleanup – talk
- Peer review – talk
A page you started (Stanislav Gorkovenko) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Stanislav Gorkovenko, Mishae!
Misplaced Pages editor EuroCarGT just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
More sources. Great start for an article!
To reply, leave a comment on EuroCarGT's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Japanese musicians
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
A page you started (Ellen Wright Clayton) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Ellen Wright Clayton, Mishae!
Misplaced Pages editor Carriearchdale just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thank-you!
To reply, leave a comment on Carriearchdale's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
A page you started (Vladimir Kapitonov) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Vladimir Kapitonov, Mishae!
Misplaced Pages editor Carriearchdale just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
This article is nicely written and quite informative.
To reply, leave a comment on Carriearchdale's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
A page you started (Some Girls, Some Hats and Hitler) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Some Girls, Some Hats and Hitler, Mishae!
Misplaced Pages editor Carriearchdale just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks!
To reply, leave a comment on Carriearchdale's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
A page you started (Mikhail Lukin) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Mikhail Lukin, Mishae!
Misplaced Pages editor Carriearchdale just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Great article. Thanks!
To reply, leave a comment on Carriearchdale's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
A page you started (Tallulah Harlech) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Tallulah Harlech, Mishae!
Misplaced Pages editor Oiyarbepsy just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Your article is missing what roles she's done as an actor and anything about her modeling work. It's only personal like which should be the least significant part of the article.
To reply, leave a comment on Oiyarbepsy's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
A page you started (Ramesh Govindan) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Ramesh Govindan, Mishae!
Misplaced Pages editor WordSeventeen just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Nice article with good referencing.
To reply, leave a comment on WordSeventeen's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
A page you started (Haliplus variegatus) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Haliplus variegatus, Mishae!
Misplaced Pages editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
The link you've provided and cite is pertinent only to Northern Ireland. The species occurs elsewhere e.g. Denmark (per source)
To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
A page you started (Tolumonas osonensis) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Tolumonas osonensis, Mishae!
Misplaced Pages editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Beware of inferring generalities from primary literature. You state "Extensively studied", which is not verified and may be subjective, and as far as we know from sources provided it has been studied in only 1 paper.
To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
A page you started (Balanoglossus australiensis) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Balanoglossus australiensis, Mishae!
Misplaced Pages editor Darylgolden just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Great job!
To reply, leave a comment on Darylgolden's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
A page you started (Dicerca pugionata) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Dicerca pugionata, Mishae!
Misplaced Pages editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Please stop inferring generalities from very specific papers. Consulting a single other source would show the species is not only found in Manada Gap, Pennsylvania. Try citing field guides or "big picture" sources.
To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - March 2015
| The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thank you to all the editors who labour away quietly and help make this WikiProject what it is; no edit goes unnoticed.
Thanks
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
22:26, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 04 March 2015
- From the editor: A sign of the times: the Signpost revamps its internal structure to make contributing easier
- Traffic report: Attack of the movies
- Arbitration report: Bradspeaks—impact, regrets, and advice; current cases hinge on sex, religion, and ... infoboxes
- Interview: Meet a paid editor
- Featured content: Ploughing fields and trading horses with Rosa Bonheur
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:44, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Phymatodes obliquus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Clara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 March 2015
- Special report: An advance look at the WMF's fundraising survey
- In the media: Gamergate; a Wiki hoax; Kanye West
- Featured content: Here they come, the couple plighted –
- Op-ed: Why the Core Contest matters
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:28, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 March 2015
- From the editor: A salute to Pine
- Featured content: A woman who loved kings
- Traffic report: It's not cricket
.
Tagging
Hello! Can you please tag the species of Gnomidolon as part of WikiProject Beetles (since they are Cerambycidae)? I would do it myself but am too busy tagging the categories. Gug01 (talk) 21:09, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gail Finney, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Southeast High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost – Volume 11, Issue 12 – 25 March 2015
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation adopts open-access research policy
- Featured content: A carnival of animals, a river of dung, a wasteland of uncles, and some people with attitude
- Special report: Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year 2014
- Traffic report: Oddly familiar
- Recent research: Most important people; respiratory reliability; academic attitudes
A page you started (Porcellionides apulicus) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Porcellionides apulicus, Mishae!
Misplaced Pages editor WordSeventeen just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks!
To reply, leave a comment on WordSeventeen's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Wikiproject Insect
Hi Mishae,
Please refrain from removing the Wikiproject Insects tag from insect related articles when added the Beetles tag. It's best to gain consensus on this widespread of a project removal at the project itself before implementing such a change. A discussion has been started here. Kingofaces43 (talk) 01:44, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
- Again, please refrain from removing the project tag. Your behavior is becoming disruptive now by trying to edit war our the tags while discussion is ongoing and it is violating the guidelines for interacting with other Wikiprojects as you've been made aware. This can result in a block if you continue to implement such widespread changes without consensus, so I highly suggest taking the time to slow down and just add the Beetles tag instead of replacing the Insect one. It's going to take a lot of work to undo this, and I definitely don't have time to do that today. Kingofaces43 (talk) 09:49, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
- This is the third time you've continued making the edits. Keep in mind you can be blocked for vandalism and violating WP:CONSENSUS by continuing to make edits like this while the talk page conversation is still ongoing. I don't want to do that, and we especially don't need things to be uncivil like this in such a small community. Please just follow WP:BRD (we're in the discussion phase now). The standard for settling contentious edits is to reach consensus on what to do first before continuing to make edits on what has been questioned. The only reason I haven't reverted your edits at this point is because I want to focus on reaching consensus, but you are not helping by engaging in this behavior. You've been here for awhile, so I would expect you would know this is improper behavior by now that violates Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Kingofaces43 (talk) 14:54, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Kingofaces43: O.K. Lets see, first of all, my edits are not vandalic, and your future comments will be removed by me per trolling. Second, I would like to say that this is the first time I am in discussion outside of my talkpage that is huge. Previously I was engaged in much smaller discussions and that went fine. I don't think any of my comments were uncivil. My initial language is Russian, so if I said something that in your language is uncivil, I would like to apologize in advance. Third, as for vandalic edits, I would like to ask users such @Ironholds: and @Koavf: for a review. Disruptive? Maybe. But there is a difference between vandalism (in which I never engage in) and this. And keep in mind, its your opinion that I am being vandalic, and such accusation will not be tolerated.--Mishae (talk) 18:03, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
- What on earth? First, the word is "vandalistic". Second, are you seriously getting up on your high horse to lecture Kingofaces43 for making "accusations" and "trolling"?
- Your edits are entirely inappropriate. Wikiproject tags do not resolve the lowest common project; they are overlapping sets. It is perfectly acceptable to have Wikiproject Insects tags on beetles, unless beetles were declared to not be beetles when I wasn't paying attention.
- So, you were making inappropriate edits that are harmful to the encyclopaedia and that even you agree are potentially disruptive. And in response to this, Kingofaces43 has been incredibly patient and polite in surfacing the problem and asking you to stop, over and over again, rather than taking it to a noticeboard to have you blocked. They have explained, repeatedly, that you are acting inappropriately, and explained why your behaviour is inappropriate, and your response is to call them a troll, inform them that you're going to revert any further attempts they make to stop you in your misbehaviour, and try to moralise at them as if you are the injured party here.
- I wouldn't be nearly so blunt or nearly so horrified if this wasn't precisely the same way I'd seen you respond to every single concern about your contributions that anyone has surfaced; people try to engage and you aggressively fight them, even though you're pretty much always in the wrong, before assuming bad faith and declaring them to be a troll or a vandal or deserving of a block or, or, or. At no point have I seen you actually respond to criticism by reading policies before replying, or by agreeing that something is a problem; you fight and you fight and you accelerate it up to me and the only thing that happens, every time, is that it turns out you're wrong and you've wasted a ton of another contributor's time of energy in being wrong.
- You want to know what I think of this situation, after every other situation you've pinged me about? Here's what I think. I think that if you don't seriously adjust how you respond to users acting in good faith and trying to correct your mistakes, you're going to get blocked, because a basic level of competence is required to edit. I think that if you keep removing those tags, I'll start the block discussion myself. And I think that I'm going to go over to Kingofaces43's talkpage, now, and give them a barnstar, for being far more patient in dealing with this than most users. Ironholds (talk) 19:53, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Ironholds: Thanks a lot! No really. I needed to agree that my edits were disruptive to show him a difference between his accusation of vandalism and this. In reality I don't think my edits were harmful to the project since user Gug01 thank me for such edits via notification. So, yes, in this case I am the injured party, because it was user Kingofaces43 who called my edits vandalistic, not the other way around. And I am being called that twice in my whole time being on Misplaced Pages. As far as competence goes, I am competent, but not in every field, and you know that.--Mishae (talk) 22:08, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Kingofaces43: O.K. Lets see, first of all, my edits are not vandalic, and your future comments will be removed by me per trolling. Second, I would like to say that this is the first time I am in discussion outside of my talkpage that is huge. Previously I was engaged in much smaller discussions and that went fine. I don't think any of my comments were uncivil. My initial language is Russian, so if I said something that in your language is uncivil, I would like to apologize in advance. Third, as for vandalic edits, I would like to ask users such @Ironholds: and @Koavf: for a review. Disruptive? Maybe. But there is a difference between vandalism (in which I never engage in) and this. And keep in mind, its your opinion that I am being vandalic, and such accusation will not be tolerated.--Mishae (talk) 18:03, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
- This is the third time you've continued making the edits. Keep in mind you can be blocked for vandalism and violating WP:CONSENSUS by continuing to make edits like this while the talk page conversation is still ongoing. I don't want to do that, and we especially don't need things to be uncivil like this in such a small community. Please just follow WP:BRD (we're in the discussion phase now). The standard for settling contentious edits is to reach consensus on what to do first before continuing to make edits on what has been questioned. The only reason I haven't reverted your edits at this point is because I want to focus on reaching consensus, but you are not helping by engaging in this behavior. You've been here for awhile, so I would expect you would know this is improper behavior by now that violates Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Kingofaces43 (talk) 14:54, 31 March 2015 (UTC)