Misplaced Pages

:Arbitration/Requests/Case: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Arbitration | Requests Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:46, 3 April 2015 view sourceL235 (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators27,344 edits Clerk notes: note← Previous edit Revision as of 13:50, 3 April 2015 view source Ret.Prof (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers15,357 edits Statement by Ret.Prof: fixNext edit →
Line 40: Line 40:


'''''At Arbitration''''' I will present substantial evidence to prove: '''''At Arbitration''''' I will present substantial evidence to prove:
#that the disputed edit at the NPOV Noticeboard was NOT FRINGE. Notwithstanding a productive discussion at the ] and ], we were still far from resolution. Therefore, I went to the NPOV Noticeboard hoping to get input from the wider community. Here the discussion was wrongfully closed before any uninvolved editors could weigh in, (after only one hour and 49 minutes) by the Anti-fringe editors.. This was "not appropriate" and the "premature unilateral threats of punishment" #that the disputed edit at the NPOV Noticeboard was NOT FRINGE. Notwithstanding a productive discussion at the ] and ], we were still far from resolution. Therefore, I went to the NPOV Noticeboard hoping to get input from the wider community. Here the discussion was wrongfully closed before any uninvolved editors could weigh in, (after only one hour and 49 minutes) by the Anti-fringe editors.. This was "not appropriate" and the "premature unilateral threats of punishment" amounted to WikiBulling.
amounted to WikiBulling.
#that for over a year, every edit that I have made has been rapidly deleted, even ones of little consequence. I will present evidence that this was intended as harassment and amounted to WikiBulling. #that for over a year, every edit that I have made has been rapidly deleted, even ones of little consequence. I will present evidence that this was intended as harassment and amounted to WikiBulling.
#the personal attacks at ] amounted to WikiBullying, but first I will have to demonstrate that such evidence is not privileged. #the personal attacks at ] amounted to WikiBullying, but first I will have to demonstrate that such evidence is not privileged.

Revision as of 13:50, 3 April 2015

Requests for arbitration

Arbitration Committee proceedings Case requests
Request name Motions Initiated Votes
WikiBullying   3 April 2015 {{{votes}}}
Open cases
Case name Links Evidence due Prop. Dec. due
Palestine-Israel articles 5 (t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t) 21 Dec 2024 11 Jan 2025
Recently closed cases (Past cases)

No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).

Clarification and Amendment requests

Currently, no requests for clarification or amendment are open.

Arbitrator motions
Motion name Date posted
Arbitrator workflow motions 1 December 2024
Shortcuts

About this page

Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority).

Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests.

Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide to case requests. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace.

To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment.


File an arbitration request


Guidance on participation and word limits

Unlike many venues on Misplaced Pages, ArbCom imposes word limits. Please observe the below notes on complying with word limits.

  • Motivation. Word limits are imposed to promote clarity and focus on the issues at hand and to ensure that arbitrators are able to fully take in submissions. Arbitrators must read a large volume of information across many matters in the course of their service on the Committee, so submissions that exceed word limits may be disregarded. For the sake of fairness and to discourage gamesmanship (i.e., to disincentivize "asking forgiveness rather than permission"), word limits are actively enforced.
  • In general. Most submissions to the Arbitration Committee (including statements in arbitration case requests and ARCAs and evidence submissions in arbitration cases) are limited to 500 words, plus 50 diffs. During the evidence phase of an accepted case, named parties are granted an automatic extension to 1000 words plus 100 diffs.
  • Sectioned discussion. To facilitate review by arbitrators, you should edit only in your own section. Address your submission to arbitrators, not to other participants. If you wish to rebut, clarify, or otherwise refer to another submission for the benefit of arbitrators, you may do so within your own section. (More information.)
  • Requesting an extension. You may request a word limit extension in your submission itself (using the {{@ArbComClerks}} template) or by emailing clerks-l@lists.wikimedia.org. In your request, you should briefly (in 1-2 sentences) include (a) why you need additional words and (b) a broad outline of what you hope to discuss in your extended submission. The Committee endeavors to act upon extension requests promptly and aims to offer flexibility where warranted.
    • Members of the Committee may also grant extensions when they ask direct questions to facilitate answers to those questions.
  • Refactoring statements. You should write carefully and concisely from the start. It is impermissible to rewrite a statement to shorten it after a significant amount of time has passed or after anyone has responded to it (see Misplaced Pages:Talk page guidelines § Editing own comments), so it is often advisable to submit a brief initial statement to leave room to respond to other users if the need arises.
  • Sign submissions. In order for arbitrators and other participants to understand the order of submissions, sign your submission and each addition (using ~~~~).
  • Word limit violations. Submissions that exceed the word limit will generally be "hatted" (collapsed), and arbitrators may opt not to consider them.
  • Counting words. Words are counted on the rendered text (not wikitext) of the statement (i.e., the number of words that you would see by copy-pasting the page section containing your statement into a text editor or word count tool). This internal gadget may also be helpful.
  • Sanctions. Please note that members and clerks of the Committee may impose appropriate sanctions when necessary to promote the effective functioning of the arbitration process.

General guidance

  • This page is for statements, not discussion.
  • Arbitrators or clerks may refactor or delete statements, e.g. off-topic or unproductive remarks, without warning.
  • Banned users may request arbitration via the committee contact page; don't try to edit this page.
  • Under no circumstances should you remove requests from this page, or open a case (even for accepted requests), unless you are an arbitrator or clerk.
  • After a request is filed, the arbitrators will vote on accepting or declining the case. The <0/0/0> tally counts the arbitrators voting accept/decline/recuse.
  • Declined case requests are logged at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Index/Declined requests. Accepted case requests are opened as cases, and logged at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Index/Cases once closed.


WikiBullying

Initiated by Ret.Prof (talk) at 13:10, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Involved parties

Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried

Statement by Ret.Prof

Organized WikiBullying has become a major problem. DiffDiff "There are gangs of editors who protect themselves & their friends, & I don't know what can be done about them. I wish these groups didn't exist, but they do & there is little interest in controlling them." - Admin. Llywrch (See WP:Tag team)

The Anti-fringe WP Religion Editors are made up of two admins, six user accounts and an undetermined number of alternate accounts. Diff1, Diff2 & Diff3 Their stated purpose is to remove “fringe” and I have been warned that they will hound me, until I am "driven from this encyclopedia". The evidence will show that I am "a mild-mannered user", have been "bullied", "belittled" and for whom WP is "no longer a hospitable place". Diff4 Diff5

At Arbitration I will present substantial evidence to prove:

  1. that the disputed edit at the NPOV Noticeboard was NOT FRINGE. Diff Notwithstanding a productive discussion at the 1. Talk page of Gospel of Matthew and 2. DSN - Gospel of Matthew, we were still far from resolution. Therefore, I went to the NPOV Noticeboard hoping to get input from the wider community. Here the discussion was wrongfully closed before any uninvolved editors could weigh in, (after only one hour and 49 minutes) by the Anti-fringe editors.Diff. This was "not appropriate" and the "premature unilateral threats of punishment" Diff amounted to WikiBulling.
  2. that for over a year, every edit that I have made has been rapidly deleted, even ones of little consequence. Diff I will present evidence that this was intended as harassment and amounted to WikiBulling.
  3. the personal attacks at Mediation amounted to WikiBullying, but first I will have to demonstrate that such evidence is not privileged.
  4. that my being brought to the ANI as an "Incompetent editor who pushes Fringe" was harassement. My "deficiencies as an editor" were expanded to include rudeness, self-aggrandizement, arrogance, tenacious and disruptive editing, along with general attempts to undermine my personal integrity.diff Indeed the "principal objection" to my editing is as follows: I exist on Misplaced Pages! diff I will bring evidence to establish these personal attacks are false and are in fact WikiBulling.

The intention is clearly to WP:HOUND me everywhere I work until I am bullied from this encyclopedia... unless arbitration puts a stop to it. They have consistently violated WP:Griefing WP:Civility and WP:Harassment Therefore I am requesting that the The Anti-fringe WP Religion Editors be banned from Misplaced Pages. However the extent and duration of the ban needed to allow me to resume normal editing should be left to the wisdom of the arbs. diff

This conflict is about two very different visions for Misplaced Pages! A careful review of the 'anti fringe edits' show that they consistently delete material that dose not reflect their POV. My vision for Misplaced Pages is that articles should be up to date and written from a NPOV reflecting the state of the scholarly issues as outlined the the reliable sources. Ret.Prof (talk) 13:27, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Statement by Username

Statement by Username

Statement by {Non-party}

Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.

Clerk notes

This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).

WikiBullying: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0/0>-WikiBullying">

Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse/other)