Revision as of 13:46, 3 April 2015 view sourceL235 (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators27,344 edits →Clerk notes: note← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:50, 3 April 2015 view source Ret.Prof (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers15,357 edits →Statement by Ret.Prof: fixNext edit → | ||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
'''''At Arbitration''''' I will present substantial evidence to prove: | '''''At Arbitration''''' I will present substantial evidence to prove: | ||
#that the disputed edit at the NPOV Noticeboard was NOT FRINGE. Notwithstanding a productive discussion at the ] and ], we were still far from resolution. Therefore, I went to the NPOV Noticeboard hoping to get input from the wider community. Here the discussion was wrongfully closed before any uninvolved editors could weigh in, (after only one hour and 49 minutes) by the Anti-fringe editors.. This was "not appropriate" and the "premature unilateral threats of punishment" | #that the disputed edit at the NPOV Noticeboard was NOT FRINGE. Notwithstanding a productive discussion at the ] and ], we were still far from resolution. Therefore, I went to the NPOV Noticeboard hoping to get input from the wider community. Here the discussion was wrongfully closed before any uninvolved editors could weigh in, (after only one hour and 49 minutes) by the Anti-fringe editors.. This was "not appropriate" and the "premature unilateral threats of punishment" amounted to WikiBulling. | ||
amounted to WikiBulling. | |||
#that for over a year, every edit that I have made has been rapidly deleted, even ones of little consequence. I will present evidence that this was intended as harassment and amounted to WikiBulling. | #that for over a year, every edit that I have made has been rapidly deleted, even ones of little consequence. I will present evidence that this was intended as harassment and amounted to WikiBulling. | ||
#the personal attacks at ] amounted to WikiBullying, but first I will have to demonstrate that such evidence is not privileged. | #the personal attacks at ] amounted to WikiBullying, but first I will have to demonstrate that such evidence is not privileged. |
Revision as of 13:50, 3 April 2015
Requests for arbitration
Arbitration Committee proceedings- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
Request name | Motions | Initiated | Votes |
---|---|---|---|
WikiBullying | 3 April 2015 | {{{votes}}} |
Case name | Links | Evidence due | Prop. Dec. due |
---|---|---|---|
Palestine-Israel articles 5 | (t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t) | 21 Dec 2024 | 11 Jan 2025 |
No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).
Clarification and Amendment requestsCurrently, no requests for clarification or amendment are open.
Arbitrator motionsMotion name | Date posted |
---|---|
Arbitrator workflow motions | 1 December 2024 |
Shortcuts
About this page Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority). Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests. Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide to case requests. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace. To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment.
Guidance on participation and word limits Unlike many venues on Misplaced Pages, ArbCom imposes word limits. Please observe the below notes on complying with word limits.
General guidance
|
WikiBullying
Initiated by Ret.Prof (talk) at 13:10, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Involved parties
- Ret.Prof (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), filing party
- John Carter (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)} desysopped Admin.
- StAnselm (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- PiCo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- In ictu oculi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Tgeorgescu (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
- Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried
Statement by Ret.Prof
Organized WikiBullying has become a major problem. DiffDiff "There are gangs of editors who protect themselves & their friends, & I don't know what can be done about them. I wish these groups didn't exist, but they do & there is little interest in controlling them." - Admin. Llywrch (See WP:Tag team)
The Anti-fringe WP Religion Editors are made up of two admins, six user accounts and an undetermined number of alternate accounts. Diff1, Diff2 & Diff3 Their stated purpose is to remove “fringe” and I have been warned that they will hound me, until I am "driven from this encyclopedia". The evidence will show that I am "a mild-mannered user", have been "bullied", "belittled" and for whom WP is "no longer a hospitable place". Diff4 Diff5
At Arbitration I will present substantial evidence to prove:
- that the disputed edit at the NPOV Noticeboard was NOT FRINGE. Diff Notwithstanding a productive discussion at the 1. Talk page of Gospel of Matthew and 2. DSN - Gospel of Matthew, we were still far from resolution. Therefore, I went to the NPOV Noticeboard hoping to get input from the wider community. Here the discussion was wrongfully closed before any uninvolved editors could weigh in, (after only one hour and 49 minutes) by the Anti-fringe editors.Diff. This was "not appropriate" and the "premature unilateral threats of punishment" Diff amounted to WikiBulling.
- that for over a year, every edit that I have made has been rapidly deleted, even ones of little consequence. Diff I will present evidence that this was intended as harassment and amounted to WikiBulling.
- the personal attacks at Mediation amounted to WikiBullying, but first I will have to demonstrate that such evidence is not privileged.
- that my being brought to the ANI as an "Incompetent editor who pushes Fringe" was harassement. My "deficiencies as an editor" were expanded to include rudeness, self-aggrandizement, arrogance, tenacious and disruptive editing, along with general attempts to undermine my personal integrity.diff Indeed the "principal objection" to my editing is as follows: I exist on Misplaced Pages! diff I will bring evidence to establish these personal attacks are false and are in fact WikiBulling.
The intention is clearly to WP:HOUND me everywhere I work until I am bullied from this encyclopedia... unless arbitration puts a stop to it. They have consistently violated WP:Griefing WP:Civility and WP:Harassment Therefore I am requesting that the The Anti-fringe WP Religion Editors be banned from Misplaced Pages. However the extent and duration of the ban needed to allow me to resume normal editing should be left to the wisdom of the arbs. diff
This conflict is about two very different visions for Misplaced Pages! A careful review of the 'anti fringe edits' show that they consistently delete material that dose not reflect their POV. My vision for Misplaced Pages is that articles should be up to date and written from a NPOV reflecting the state of the scholarly issues as outlined the the reliable sources. Ret.Prof (talk) 13:27, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Statement by Username
Statement by Username
Statement by {Non-party}
Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.
Clerk notes
- This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).
- @Ret.Prof: Noting that I've notified and added diffs, --L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 13:46, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
WikiBullying: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0/0>-WikiBullying">
Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse/other)