Revision as of 23:39, 3 April 2015 edit192.34.131.84 (talk) →March 2015← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:41, 3 April 2015 edit undo192.34.131.84 (talk) →Misplaced Pages articles not relevant nor accurate: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
These are to discuss the article itself, not attack other organisations. If you don't think the SPLC can be used, you are welcome to complain at ]. As you can see above, copying chunks of material from the web is also something that can't be done unless it is clearly copyright free. ] (]) 16:02, 3 April 2015 (UTC) | These are to discuss the article itself, not attack other organisations. If you don't think the SPLC can be used, you are welcome to complain at ]. As you can see above, copying chunks of material from the web is also something that can't be done unless it is clearly copyright free. ] (]) 16:02, 3 April 2015 (UTC) | ||
== Misplaced Pages articles not relevant nor accurate == | |||
It is clear that you are not interested in factual accuracy in the article. | |||
You can revert it and make Misplaced Pages articles not relevant nor accurate as | |||
this is becoming ever more common and known in the internet community. Do a | |||
little research and you will see that everything I had changed was FACTUAL. | |||
End of Story. |
Revision as of 23:41, 3 April 2015
March 2015
It is clear that you are not interested in factual accuracy in the article. You can revert it and make Misplaced Pages articles not relevant nor accurate as this is becoming ever more common and known in the internet community. Do a little research and you will see that everything I had changed was FACTUAL. End of Story. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.34.131.84 (talk • contribs)
- If your edit added "actual facts that anyone can research and find on the internet," then you should be able to find a reliable source that supports your changes. Did you make a mistake in that edit summary? Ian.thomson (talk) 00:37, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
The "reliable source" is the "actual source" itself. The National Alliance or www.natall.com .
Go check it out for yourself. It, the NA, exists. The new Chairman is William White Williams, since Erich Gliebe resigned, and it is now a membership organization, as in the "join us" link.
What else makes that so difficult for you to understand? No source is more reliable than is the direct source and vs any second-hand source.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.34.131.84 (talk • contribs)
- Natall.com is not cited at any point in the article, so they are not the "actual" source. Misplaced Pages sticks to independent sources, because primary sources about such groups are not likely to present a reliable or realistic image.
- Ian.thomson (talk) 00:58, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
So cite it, as they are the actual direct primary source. The so-called "independent sources" that have been cited in this article, like the SPLC, are neither "reliable" nor "realistic" and nor are they even "accurate". "Image" is subjective and POV, whereas, the actual facts are NPOV. Again, it is clear that you are not interested in factual accuracy in the article. You can revert it and just make such Misplaced Pages articles not relevant nor accurate as usual as this is just becoming ever more common and well-known in the internet community, or just as is the "dinosaur" mass media. Do a little independent research yourself and you will see that everything I had changed IS FACTUAL, whereas the article you reverted back to is NOT FACTUAL. That is fine with me, as this only reflects Misplaced Pages's difficulty with ever having or in getting the facts straight and correct verses being just SPLC false propaganda. So be it!
=================================================================================
Hello, I'm Dougweller. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on National Alliance (United States), but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Misplaced Pages has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 21:47, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please do not add or change content, as you did to National Alliance (United States), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. You need to provide inline citations for your additions. NeilN 22:16, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at National Alliance (United States), you may be blocked from editing. "inadvertent possession of three thumbnail photos of child pornography and falsely for seeking" - don't think so NeilN 23:08, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at National Alliance (United States). Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. NeilN 23:09, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Hey Asshole, Check out the links and see that what was edited was factual. This is why your articles just suck and are not up to date!
Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:39, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Again, it is clear that you are not interested in factual accuracy in the article. You can and have reverted it and make Misplaced Pages articles not relevant nor accurate as this is becoming ever more common and known in the internet community. Do a little independent research and you will see that everything that I had changed in the article was FACTUAL. End of Story. I can't fix you "editors" here all being so stupid. You just don't get it. So be it.
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:59, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
March 2015
You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for violating WP:3RR at National Alliance (United States) and personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 00:49, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Article. This contravenes Misplaced Pages's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:24, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
April 2015
This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Mordechai Nessyahu. Amaury (talk) 00:54, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at National Alliance (United States). NeilN 14:41, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Misplaced Pages and copyright
Hello 192.34.131.84, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Your addition to Talk:National Alliance (United States) has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Misplaced Pages, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Misplaced Pages:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Misplaced Pages:Copyrights. You may also want to review Misplaced Pages:Copy-paste.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Misplaced Pages:Donating copyrighted materials.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Misplaced Pages:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Misplaced Pages articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Misplaced Pages project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Misplaced Pages:Copying within Misplaced Pages.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 16:00, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
use of article talk pages
These are to discuss the article itself, not attack other organisations. If you don't think the SPLC can be used, you are welcome to complain at WP:RSN. As you can see above, copying chunks of material from the web is also something that can't be done unless it is clearly copyright free. Dougweller (talk) 16:02, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages articles not relevant nor accurate
It is clear that you are not interested in factual accuracy in the article. You can revert it and make Misplaced Pages articles not relevant nor accurate as this is becoming ever more common and known in the internet community. Do a little research and you will see that everything I had changed was FACTUAL. End of Story.