| Revision as of 10:01, 24 July 2006 editThomas B (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,921 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:02, 24 July 2006 edit undoThomas B (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,921 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==Controlled demo, WTC, etc.== | |||
| {| style="width:98%; height:260px" border="3" | |||
| |<B><FONT FACE="Neolith" SIZE="5" COLOR="red">Welcome!</font></B> | |||
| Hello, {{PAGENAME}}, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the ], where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type '''<code>{{helpme}}</code>''' on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. | |||
| Here are a few good links for newcomers: | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| * | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me or an experienced wikipedian like ] and ] and leave your message on our talk page. Again, welcome! | |||
| If you want to tell me something or if you just want to say hi, leave your message under the '''Talk Section''' of | |||
| Once you've become an experienced Wikipedian, please take your time to visit this page: | |||
| *] | |||
| <font face="Arial" color="green">]</font><font face="sienna" color="sienna">]</font> | |||
| |} | |||
| ---- | |||
| '''<code>{{helpme}}</code>''' | |||
| Any advice on how to deal with this situation would be appreciated. (Especially from someone who does not have very strong opinions about the subject.) ]--] 13:10, 21 July 2006 (UTC) | Any advice on how to deal with this situation would be appreciated. (Especially from someone who does not have very strong opinions about the subject.) ]--] 13:10, 21 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 10:02, 24 July 2006
Controlled demo, WTC, etc.
Any advice on how to deal with this situation would be appreciated. (Especially from someone who does not have very strong opinions about the subject.) Talk:Collapse_of_the_World_Trade_Center--Thomas Basboll 13:10, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
- So far you're doing what you need to, which is keeping cool and staying on firm ground. I think sticking with that strategy is your best bet.
- One of your problems is that the last person to try large changes to the article was a pretty difficult fellow. He would often start out proposing what seemed to be reasonable changes and then get less reasonable. Whether he didn't have the discipline to keep his POV in check, or was trying to sneak things in, I don't know. I think a lot of people are waiting to see if you crack under pressure and say something nutty.
- Part of the skepticisim directed at you is also because you don't have much of an edit history. It would probably go easier for you if you had a bunch of edits in an unrelated field (such as your area of expertise) that could be checked over for tone and content. Also, it may have been easier if you had started out as a participant in the discussion at the collapse page rather than the principal. I'm not certain about that, though - It's rather polarized and anything you say will likely get you lumped into one of the two camps. Toiyabe 17:09, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
- Interesting. Thanks. I may take your advice. I've done some big (but few) changes on the social epistemology page, some of them a while back before I decided to use my real name. I guess I could just let all this lie for bit longer before actually making the edits.--Thomas Basboll 17:42, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks!
Hi Thomas - just want to flash you a big smile for the great job you are doing at Collapse of the World Trade Center. You are apparantly the one needed to get this articles standard up. Keep up the good work :) EyesAllMine 09:29, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- Hey, thanks, it's been interesting. After the original controversy I reread the article and thought that much of the policy talk (POV and OR especially) was pretty minor given the level of the prose. It seemed especially strange to banish even the dismissal of CD, when NIST's own account was hardly on the page at all. Anyway, I'm glad you like it.--Thomas Basboll 10:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC)