| Revision as of 09:11, 1 February 2006 editHinotori (talk | contribs)1,267 edits Apologies and Thanks← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:18, 24 July 2006 edit undoSupreme Cmdr (talk | contribs)583 edits Derek Smart pageNext edit → | ||
| Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
| I don't know if you've noticed, but the Werewolves link for the ] article has erupted into a long, drawn-out, sad affair regarding the inclusion of the link. Most of the discussion is on the ], but it's a giant mess. You'd find ] to be slightly more coherent and a pretty good summary of the arguments (and in some cases, lack thereof) involved. I thought you might be interested seeing as you've commented on this before. The case could certainly use some third-party insight. -- ]<sup><small>]|]</small></sup> 14:47, 22 January 2006 (UTC) | I don't know if you've noticed, but the Werewolves link for the ] article has erupted into a long, drawn-out, sad affair regarding the inclusion of the link. Most of the discussion is on the ], but it's a giant mess. You'd find ] to be slightly more coherent and a pretty good summary of the arguments (and in some cases, lack thereof) involved. I thought you might be interested seeing as you've commented on this before. The case could certainly use some third-party insight. -- ]<sup><small>]|]</small></sup> 14:47, 22 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ===Derek Smart=== | |||
| I have cleaned up this page and checked it for Original Source violations. Do you want to take a | |||
| look. Lets work on this amicably, reach a compromise and get the page locked. There is no point | |||
| in continued bickering over this because it is counterproductive. The Werewolves link is not a | |||
| reliable source and is considered original research. ]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 13:18, 24 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Very nice cleanup == | == Very nice cleanup == | ||
Revision as of 13:18, 24 July 2006
Archived Talk
Schiavo-related Talk archive
DLI
Glad you like the updates! (I'm also glad to see there's at least one other person on the Internet who cares about DLI.) You can sign up for the Alumni Association newsletter at http://www.dli-alumni.org/ (they send out about 1 or 2 letters per quarter, with stories about DLI grads or professors, and once in a while they send out special news like the BRAC hearings). I was in the Arabic course from January 1996 to May 1997, then after Goodfellow I was at 2nd Rad Bn. I'm definitely keeping a close eye on the BRAC hearings because if DLI closes, I'll have no more excuse to drag my wife up to Monterey every couple of years! :) Kafziel 11:26, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
jarhead
thought you might be interested .
Ribbon Creek Incident
Fox, I was reading through this article and was completely confused by the "consequences" section. Was the DI court martialed or not? There is also a weird sentence construction that says something about an investigation into training methods but I can't tell if it means that no problesm were found or problems were found. I figured you might know. FuelWagon 20:37, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
- I think I found a reliable URL. I changed the article a bit. Submitted to your review. FuelWagon 21:07, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
A couple more minor edits for your review FuelWagon 23:08, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
Open gaming
Thanks for your comments on the Talk:Open gaming article. Whether or not you agree with me, just having someone else reading the article and trying to understand the facts of the matter is a relief. -- BBlackmoor 02:59, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
Incidentally, freeroleplay.org is Axon's web site. -- BBlackmoor 13:14, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
Vandalism
Thanks for keeping my page clean, Fox. SlimVirgin 19:27, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
M240G
When the heck did the M240G get adopted? FuelWagon 19:57, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- Ah, that would explain it, I'm working off of older information... ;) FuelWagon 20:12, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
Test
Fox1 (talk) 12:30, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
You are a slave to tradition.
Anyone who uses "rv vandalism" in an edit summary does not need a welcome message, I think. Have a good one! Hipocrite - «Talk» 16:19, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
- You asked me to call you a slave to tradition! Actually, I think you're just nicer than me. Hipocrite - «Talk» 18:20, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
Prussian Blue
Hi! I felt that the text about Zyklon-B was too far fetched and based on no evidence. I wrote something about it at Talk:Prussian_Blue_(American_duo). Lapinmies 16:53, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
Appreciate the info.
Appreciate the info. in regards to military rivalries, especially on the topic relating to the "Jarheads" topic. I've had kin in the military, and they've reported about all manner of things, like the rivalries in the different military branches, officers that LOVE to "pull rank". I'm a military brat, due to having kin in the military. One USAF joke about the US Army Paratroopers was that those (to be polite) people are so dumb that they'll jump out of a GOOD airplane. I'm sure you've heard them all, like I have. Martial Law 08:11, 4 November 2005 (UTC) :)
General Order 9
I had a Boot Camp USMC manual that a former(yeah right, once a Marine, always a Marine) Marine had given me. On the Regulations pertaining to General Order 9, a UFO is illustrated. Another Marine commented that this was the govt.'s way of telling us that we have some visitors on a nightime radio talk show. Is Gen. order 9 intended for this ?Martial Law 03:22, 5 November 2005 (UTC) :)
Been off helping to nail a glitch. Do you still have your old USMC Boot Manual ? In this thing is what is referred to General order 9, a set of regulations to deal w/ unforseen matters. It,in recent issues, it also has a illustration of a UFO in it, with either a PFC placing a call to HQ, or a platoon of Marines getting into position to deal with a UFO. Is that still circulating ?Martial Law 00:07, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
A former(yeah right, once a Marine,always a Marine) Marine had photocopied this from his old USMC Boot Manual, concearning Gen. Order 9, and E-mailed a radio talk show that deals w/ paranormal matters. Semper Fi. Martial Law 00:11, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
USMC review
Salam aleykoum Fox,
I put your "gang" ;-) up for review, so, as an expert, take a look here, please. Maybe I'll join them, too. Thanks in advance. --Predator capitalism 11:32, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
Werewolves link
I don't know if you've noticed, but the Werewolves link for the Derek Smart article has erupted into a long, drawn-out, sad affair regarding the inclusion of the link. Most of the discussion is on the talk page, but it's a giant mess. You'd find this mediation case to be slightly more coherent and a pretty good summary of the arguments (and in some cases, lack thereof) involved. I thought you might be interested seeing as you've commented on this before. The case could certainly use some third-party insight. -- Hinotori 14:47, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
Derek Smart
I have cleaned up this page and checked it for Original Source violations. Do you want to take a look. Lets work on this amicably, reach a compromise and get the page locked. There is no point in continued bickering over this because it is counterproductive. The Werewolves link is not a reliable source and is considered original research. Supreme_Cmdr 13:18, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Very nice cleanup
(ESkog) 02:51, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
Apologies and Thanks
I just want to say how sorry I am that you've been dragged into this quagmire of despair. I contacted you regarding the article because I thought your previous contributions might warrant your interest in weighing in, but I had no intention of getting you directly involved. That said, I want to thank you very much for your patience and mental stamina for enduring this mind-numbing conflict so far. Your ability to keep calm and rational is truly commendable. I, like you, could really care less about this topic; it's the grating, condescending attitudes of the two of them that really made me want to stick around. Thanks again.