Misplaced Pages

talk:General sanctions/Electronic cigarettes: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:General sanctions Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:41, 14 April 2015 editQuackGuru (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users79,978 edits User:SPACKlick reported by User:QuackGuru (Result: ): add← Previous edit Revision as of 08:43, 14 April 2015 edit undoQuackGuru (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users79,978 edits User:SPACKlick reported by User:QuackGuru (Result: ): Please show not assert your allegations.Next edit →
Line 39: Line 39:


:I hold my hands up to this one, although I dispute that 1 is a revert. Also after whatever action is taken I'd like to ask what the appropriate method for dealing with an editor like Quack who spams lots of small edits onto the page without even attempting to find consensus despite prior discussion in some cases when there are so few editors at a page? ] (]) 08:17, 14 April 2015 (UTC) :I hold my hands up to this one, although I dispute that 1 is a revert. Also after whatever action is taken I'd like to ask what the appropriate method for dealing with an editor like Quack who spams lots of small edits onto the page without even attempting to find consensus despite prior discussion in some cases when there are so few editors at a page? ] (]) 08:17, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
::You deleted that were not duplication. I was trying to discuss things with you then . You previously claimed you made only . More text was . Without evidence you are claiming ? ] (]) 08:41, 14 April 2015 (UTC) ::You deleted that were not duplication. I was trying to discuss things with you then . You previously claimed you made only . More text was . ] you are claiming ? ] (]) 08:41, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:43, 14 April 2015

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the General sanctions/Electronic cigarettes page.

Who can inform editors?

@Bishonen: Does it have to be an admin who places the notification on user's talk pages? There's at least one editor who's editing relevant pages but hasn't been informed. SPACKlick (talk) 07:38, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Probably more than one. Please see the instructions here: "Any editor may make another editor aware of the sanctions, and then log the notification, as specified in each case". Log here. Bishonen | talk 07:48, 9 April 2015 (UTC).
Any editor can make a notification, provided he follows the procedure specified at WP:AC/DS#Awareness and alerts. The difference between ArbCom DS and community DS is that GS have different templates and logging procedures, which are specified on this page. RGloucester 13:17, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Violation of the 3RR

User:SPACKlick reported by User:QuackGuru (Result: )

Page
Electronic cigarette (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
SPACKlick (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Electronic_cigarette&diff=655461925&oldid=655457035 My edit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Electronic_cigarette&diff=656291797&oldid=656291338 Revert one by SPACKlick.

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Electronic_cigarette&diff=656298163&oldid=656298112 My edit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Electronic_cigarette&diff=656303862&oldid=656303264 Revert two by SPACKlick.

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Electronic_cigarette&diff=656305106&oldid=656303862 My edit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Electronic_cigarette&diff=656306218&oldid=656305106 Revert three by SPACKlick.

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Electronic_cigarette&diff=656311733&oldid=656311581 My edit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Electronic_cigarette&diff=656311834&oldid=656311733 Revert four by SPACKlick.

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Electronic_cigarette&diff=656362329&oldid=656345708 My edit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Electronic_cigarette&diff=next&oldid=656362329 Revert five by SPACKlick.

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Electronic_cigarette&diff=prev&oldid=656384228 My edit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Electronic_cigarette&diff=656384442&oldid=656384228 Revert six. This was the previous warning. User:Mr. Stradivarius, where should this be reported since the page is under DS? QuackGuru (talk) 08:12, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

I hold my hands up to this one, although I dispute that 1 is a revert. Also after whatever action is taken I'd like to ask what the appropriate method for dealing with an editor like Quack who spams lots of small edits onto the page without even attempting to find consensus despite prior discussion in some cases when there are so few editors at a page? SPACKlick (talk) 08:17, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
You deleted three sentences that were not duplication. I was trying to discuss things with you then this happened. You previously claimed you made only two reverts. More text was deleted. Without evidence you are claiming I am disruptive? QuackGuru (talk) 08:41, 14 April 2015 (UTC)