| Revision as of 19:08, 14 April 2015 edit174.141.182.82 (talk) →Ace Combat redlink discussion: WP:Dispute resolution is pretty important, and requires talking with other editors← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:47, 15 April 2015 edit undoEaglestorm (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,735 edits my talk page my rules. get lostNext edit → | ||
| Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
| * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's ]. | * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's ]. | ||
| Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's ], and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through ]. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in ]. ''Per ]''<!-- Template:uw-disruptive2 --> ] <sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> 12:56, 5 July 2014 (UTC) | Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's ], and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through ]. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in ]. ''Per ]''<!-- Template:uw-disruptive2 --> ] <sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> 12:56, 5 July 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == Ace Combat redlink discussion == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br> | |||
| Please be particularly aware that ] states: | |||
| # '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''. | |||
| # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | |||
| In particular, editors should be aware of the ], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, and '''breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a ]'''. | |||
| If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-ew --> | |||
| Look, if you’re not willing to even discuss this, then please stop reverting it. I’ve given my argument, which is in line with Misplaced Pages policy. Now it’s your turn. And calling my attempts at communication a is just disingenuous. Misplaced Pages works through collaboration. You must be willing to do that. —] (]) 17:26, 14 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :Assuming that you simply don’t ''use'' Talk pages… you should probably avoid making potentially controversial edits to WIkipedia, especially reversions of other users’ edits. If you disagree with another editor, just move on. Otherwise, you could easily get yourself blocked when a simple conversation could have completely avoided it. {{pb}} Anyway, at ], there are now two other editors in support of the redlink, and they don’t know your reasoning, either. Please either respond (there, here, my Talk page, anywhere) or leave it be. —] (]) 19:07, 14 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:47, 15 April 2015
Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).
| This is Eaglestorm's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 |
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
 Archives |
DYK for El Presidente (film)
 | On 21 January 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article El Presidente (film), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the film El Presidente, an official 2012 Metro Manila Film Festival entry, is possibly the most expensive Filipino film of all time? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/El Presidente (film). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:33, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
February 2013
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 15:00, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
Eaglestorm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is highly unjustified and AussieLegend and people like Meggieh69 are pushing too far. The warnings they sent my way are illegal because I do not intend to dignify their actions with a response. I'm currently concentrating on other edits. For the past several weeks, Meggieh69 and AL have been breathing down my neck for some things they do wrong. If Meggieh69 couldn't hack the way I put in the episode descriptions (which I have tried to steer away from being close to original; AL has been working to revert potential copyvio ep descriptions and he sees Meggieh69's nonsense as much better), I think he ought to stay away, because he's nothing more than an SPA obsessed with HIMYM episode description and goes forumshopping to defend himself. It has been amped up further by people such as 134340Goat who often defers to Meggieh69 about my editing patterns these past few years. Please remove this block immediately, but I don't intend to work with these people. The ep summaries have been doing well until Meggieh69 came along. I have been editing well for the past six years and you want to crack down on me because of some noob who thinks he's better?
Decline reason:
Wow...personal attacks and not even trying to recognize their own behaviour in the same failed unblock (✉→BWilkins←✎) 15:19, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Eagle, you need to calm down, relax, and try and thrash out a consensus in talk pages. WP:POINTy edit summaries, comments and deletions of information won't help your case. If you don't want to work with these editors, the answer is simple: work on some of the thousands of other articles in need of improvement. Lukeno94 (talk) 19:02, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- Who are you? Don't tell me where I can and can't edit... and BWilkins what's that supposed to mean? --Eaglestorm (talk) 14:39, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
ANEW and Vortex
Please read my comments at WP:ANEW and consider yourself warned.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:23, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you and from his lengthy responses, it seems he can't leave enough alone and he's very much inflexible about his precious plot summary being adjusted to fit the actual story. He proclaims to have worked so hard to improve the article when his reverts are basically trying to tell people he owns the article. What nonsense. Consider him a member of an alliance against me. --Eaglestorm (talk) 16:06, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Bluerules
I'm here to talk to you about Bluerules.
He does a history of disruptive editing over film credit orders in cast section on various films, including The Incredible Burt Wonderstone, Olympus Has Fallen, Gettysburg, Heat, Outbreak, etc. Darkwarriorblake and I do agree that his persistent and disruptive editing over cast orders in various movies is not necessarily meeting up with consensus. He has a history of blocks as well as a result of his disruptive editing.
I just thought you should know that your not alone on this. BattleshipMan (talk) 08:00, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks. I've been seeing the behavior for the past several weeks. He's clearly off the deep end. --Eaglestorm (talk) 08:12, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Invitation
You are invited to join in on this section of the Edit Warring noticeboard. BattleshipMan (talk) 18:57, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Negative national stereotypes in CoH2
Why did you deleted all information about uproar, evoked by the game in Russia and other countries? What does it mean "delete; talk page discussion first" - if there is a talk page discussion? This information was about point of view, expressed in review articles, popular blogs and petitions with thousands of supporters!
- First up, speak English properly. My edit summary is what is - I don't have to explain it to you. So you say your piece in the discussion and if your points are not notable for inclusion, don't force the issue. These petitions you claim? How do we know you didn't engineer that for inclusion, you big zhmurik? --Eaglestorm (talk) 11:16, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Ban Appeal of AKonanykhin
Hi. Since you contributed to the discussion resulting in the ban of Wikiexperts, you may want to consider the CEO's appeal at Misplaced Pages:AN#Ban Appeal of AKonanykhin. --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 17:23, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- Let me read it first and yeah, Jehochman's so a whiteknight for a guy who has his own article. Thanks!--Eaglestorm (talk) 14:22, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
How I Met Your Mother
I am requesting a discussion be made somewhere, regarding the series of edits made to HIMYM articles - many by you. I have posted a message on Koavf's talk page in much greater detail: the bulk of the message is there. I am aware that you may not respond swiftly but would like your input if a proper discussion does get started. Bilorv (Contribs) 15:38, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
- Slurs In case you aren't aware, mocking someone for being mentally ill is considered rude. If you have a problem with my edits, that's fine but referring to them as a mass slaughter or calling into question my mental health is not. Many of these articles have trivial and unsourced sections (many of them have had them for years) and those are inappropriate. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:46, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
Since this message, you have continued to revert more edits by Koavf to HIMYM articles (e.g.). Please respond - I have had a conversation with Koavf on their talk page - read it and feel free to add to the discussion.
If you revert another of Koavf's edits on a HIMYM article without replying here, on my talk page, Koavf's talk page or anywhere else, I will start mass reverting any of your edits that go against the vague consensus reached between me and Koavf to see if that can get your attention. Bilorv (Contribs) 15:32, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed that you reverted one of my changes to The Front Porch without leaving an edit summary. When reverting edits that are not obviously vandalism, please leave an edit summary so people understand the reasoning behind the edit. (Although this is not actually a template, I am justifying this with WP:TR.) Bilorv (Contribs) 06:58, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
July 2014
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Per WP:TR Bilorv (Contribs) 12:56, 5 July 2014 (UTC)