Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 08:33, 23 April 2015

Template:Archive box collapsible

Swarm is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

This user replies where s/he likes, and is inconsistent in that respect.	This user is fallible and encourages other admins to be bold in reverting their admin actions.	~~~~ Swarm signs their posts and thinks you should too!

Swarm
Home —— Talk —— Email —— Contribs —— Awards —— Dash

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Issues_at_Rgloucester.27s_talk_page. Thank you. Tutelary (talk) 21:19, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

UTRS Account Request

I confirm that I have requested an account on the UTRS tool. Swarm

Note

If you could, please keep watch on these everyday reverts with dubious explanations, ranging from vandalism to sockpuppetry. 2001:7E8:C624:B001:230:48FF:FED7:4CD7 (talk) 16:41, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

This is banned JarlaxleArtemis who has been targeting me recently, for amusement. See also Special:Contributions/2001:7E8:C676:AE01:230:48FF:FED7:4CD7, Special:Contributions/2001:7E8:C6BD:D901:230:48FF:FED7:4CD7, Special:Contributions/2001:7E8:C6A0:9401:230:48FF:FED7:4CD7, Special:Contributions/2001:7E8:C67F:9401:230:48FF:FED7:4CD7 and Special:Contributions/2001:7E8:C242:5B01:230:48FF:FED7:4CD7. So much amusement. Binksternet (talk) 21:55, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Case in point: accused of sockpuppetry. Like he just said, he does this sort of stuff for his own amusement. 2001:7E8:C624:B001:230:48FF:FED7:4CD7 (talk) 22:48, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Revision deletion

Hi Swarm, I saw this revision deletion and I can't see how it would be covered by the revision deletion criteria? Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:32, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

It was a false entry; due to a mistake on my part, no changes to the block were actually made. I honestly thought it was okay to delete the incorrect duplicate log entry per RD6. I see now that log redaction is separate from revdel criteria and log entries aren't covered by RV6 at all. I've never had the occasion to revdel a log so I should've brushed up on the policy, but that's totally my bad for assuming. 100% mistake on my part Callanecc. Swarm 23:18, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

No worries. Yeah only revision deletions themselves are covered by RD6. I'll remove the revdel, if that's okay? Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:45, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Of course. Thanks for letting me know! Swarm 10:51, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Dispute with Ironholds

I'd like to formally say, thanks, to you for unblocking me. It has appears that I am being immature, when I am just stating my emotions. Nothing that I've said on his talk page was inappropriate, and harassing. I seriously think that he should calm down, as I've seen his emotions is an exact opposite of mine. However, emotions doesn't always mean it's immature. Immaturity is when you haven't developed. I was stating that it was hilarious how three people were arguing over a conversation on the internet. I see no immaturity in there. I was just stating my opinion, and neither statement I made was deemed harassment or immaturity. So, Ironholds has stated that you need to block me again. Which I don't seem to be necessary. I'm sorry that he is having a rough day, but his job at Misplaced Pages shouldn't be interfered with his emotions. All in all, Ironholds just wants to block me again. However, I deemed it unnecessary, and I think that he needs to know what is considered immaturity, and what is not. Like I said, thanks for giving me a second chance, and if you want to see the contributions I've made, go right ahead. Nick2crosby (talk) 15:45, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

No, I didn't, I said Swarm should be aware of how you are behaving; this is not the same as "Swarm, you should block this person". I will say that if you keep behaving in this fashion, I think you will end up blocked. Ironholds (talk) 16:04, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Forumshooping

Zekenyan is still forumshooping after Al this time. AcidSnow (talk) 15:45, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protection on User talk:Nick2crosby

I see that you yesterday unblocked User:Nick2crosby. I notice that his user talk page has been semi-protected since 20 January 2013‎, & without a sub-page linked from it. This seems to be in violation of Misplaced Pages:Protection policy#User talk pages and I see no obvious reason for the semi-protection to be indefinite. The guidance may, of course, have been different in 2013, but perhaps you could consider removing the protection? I'll ping @Ironholds: who imposed the protection, in case he has views on this. - David Biddulph (talk) 16:41, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

I don't have any opinion; I'd like Nick to stay away from me, given his behaviour, and will be doing my best to stay away from him. That includes this sort of discussion. Ironholds (talk) 16:45, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

I unprotected the page. It's probably no longer necessary now. Thanks for letting me know. Swarm 16:48, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Review of admin actions and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted in most arbitration pages please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 08:33, 23 April 2015 (UTC)