Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 08:33, 23 April 2015

Your edits are appearing under Vandalism in Huggle

This is fyi only. for Encyclopedia. Clearly bot mistake. --AmritasyaPutra 06:24, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

I don't use automated tools, the editor in question has been reverted and blocked. Thanks for the heads up, I'll let the bot operator know. Nakon 06:26, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Product data

You recently closed Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Product data record where you say "Should additional references become available, I would be willing to review this close." I don't understand why you didn't accept the existing reference which I supplied but, anyway, here's another one: Product Data Record: The heart of PLM. This source goes on for pages discussing the product data record which is an essential in a manufacturing administration system. Andrew D. (talk) 12:39, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, this reference does look a lot better. I'll revert the close and restore the article if you could please add it to the article. Nakon 16:29, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

just rich gates

Hello. Can you please reconsider that article deletion? It was re done and one of the delete votes states that their reason was that the subject did not fit criteria.....but actually the artist does fit. On case my IP changes again I am the IP who keeps voting keep on that article. Thank you2601:C:6783:6A01:E1C0:CBAF:775F:268C (talk) 00:59, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

At the time of deletion, the article did not meet the notability criteria for music-related articles and there was a consensus to delete it. Nakon 16:35, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks...

...for reverting the vandalism to my user page. Here's a question: I wasn't able to open the page to see what the 988K bytes were that the vandal posted there (or, rather, I didn't have the patience to wait until it loaded), but do you think it could be related in any way to this, in which an editor named Moxy_reborn's user page wouldn't open because of the million bytes of images of Angela Merkel which that editor had posted there? My understanding is that "Moxy" is the username of a banned or indef blocked editor, and I'm wondering if these things are all connected. BMK (talk) 23:59, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

It's very likely. The edit contained hundreds of image inclusions which would overload the page when trying to render it. This activity matches several patterns of long term abuse. Nakon 00:02, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Thought it might. Could you also take a look at the IP editor who'se currently vandalising by talk page, 82.132.219.228? Thanks. BMK (talk) 00:03, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Blocked! Nakon 00:04, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks again! BMK (talk) 00:05, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Re:ISUPsychlaw

The account was blocked after I had a look at the subject matter from which they were editing, a psychology and law professor from Iowa State University. Iowa State University would abbreviate to ISU, and psychology and law would abbreviate to psychlaw. The latter part wasn't an issue, but the ISU part suggested that this could be a corporate account or an account with a shared editor base, hence the block. It was, in fairness, a judgement call on my part, so I am open to a review of the action. Don't be shy to ask if there is anything else you'd like to know. TomStar81 (Talk) 00:04, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification. The editor was confused due to the block message itself since it implied bad faith on their part. From the template that was used, " is obviously profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to the encyclopedia". I'll explain that it was due to their possible shared account status and go from there. Thanks again, Nakon 00:09, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Before the account be unblocked (if it comes to that) it'd be a good idea to ask about the Psychology1234 account, if the person behind that account is the same one behind ISUPsychlaw then that will create trouble for the user vis-a-vis sock-puppetry. I intentionally avoided filing for a case for the two editors on good faith grounds since with one account blocked a new account could be created to take its place, but if they belong to the same editor it should be explained that any unblocking for a name change would also have to result in a declaration of multiple accounts and the appropriate tags for both accounts so that the editor can avoid any future allegations of socking here on the site. TomStar81 (Talk) 16:09, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Assuming you're an admin

Regarding correction tape, it looks like there's more than enough images there, especially since they're all of the same tape model. Moreover, they're all uploaded by a user named "Fullmark," which seems like a "subtle" advertising attempt... Is it alright to remove all but one of those images? If it's okay, I assume you'll do it, since you would be able to delete them at the same time (assuming you have that power). -- UltimateKuriboh (talk) 02:10, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Yes, removing all but one of the images would be most appropriate. Please go ahead and make this edit. If you run in to any issues, please let me know. — Nakon 02:12, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

• UK, the images themselves are on the Commons. Neither Nakon nor I has admin rights there. To get them deleted, you would have to go to the Commons and make a deletion request. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:56, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Insect related articles

Can you move all of them to my userspace?

I agree that they were made by a blocked user, but they weren't bad and I can take the responsibility. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 04:00, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Please generate a list of the articles and I will be able to move them to your userspace. Nakon 04:02, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Provided. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 04:35, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Due to the high number of articles, I've enlisted the help of a bot operator to restore and move the articles to your userspace. This process may take up to 2 days to complete, please stand by. Nakon 05:04, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

I think we're ready to go on this -- ping me on my talk page or on IRC when you want to sync up. I'll be around the rest of the weekend off and on. —Tim Pierce (talk) 22:10, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

There was an issue with verifying the bot's output so I manually performed these moves/edits. @OccultZone:, these should now be done. Nakon 23:20, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Disruptive IP

With regards to Special:Contributions/109.78.189.99, this IP seems to be denying making personal attacks after making them (indirectly while on talk page). Doesn't seem to take my warnings seriously (or the encyclopedia itself). Snuggums (talk / edits) 05:01, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Blocked. Nakon 05:02, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you! Snuggums (talk / edits) 05:03, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

The user is still attacking the encyclopedia, I suggest extending the block and/or revoking talk page access. Snuggums (talk / edits) 05:23, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Blocked a week with permissions disabled. Nakon 05:24, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Sounds good. Snuggums (talk / edits) 05:25, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Death Threats

There are revisions starting with this one that need to be hidden from public view due to their content. - Amaury (talk) 21:57, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Removed. Nakon 22:02, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi

I greatly appreciate the "cleaning up" you have done on Jewish refugees, but might I remind you that the guy in question usually do the same edits to the talk-page? @Ymblanter: will the next sock turn up? Will the sun rise in the east? You tell me. Cheers, Huldra (talk) 22:06, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up, I've removed that revision as well. Nakon 22:07, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks!! Huldra (talk) 23:00, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

I noticed this one, too. (It is very typical of him: reverting me when I report his vandalism). Huldra (talk) 19:41, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Miniature portrait of George Washington, by Peale

Hello! I am the author of Miniature portrait of George Washington, by Peale article! I am new to wikipedia, could you make it clear for me why this article was deleted?

Hello, the article was deleted after the discussion at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Miniature portrait of George Washington, by Charles Willson Peale. Please review this discussion before making any further edits. Thanks, Nakon 03:40, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

AfD Question

Hi, I am not questioning your closes on the Deathcentrik albums but for my own information I would like some help. My understanding of significant coverage is more than one or two reviews in RS. If that is not the case I would like to know what the community considers significant coverage for music so I do not AfD things for mo reason. A person with a couple minor articles would never pass GNG and ir uses the same criteria. I am still learning and prefer to not repeat mistakes. Thank you for your help.Jbh (talk) 10:57, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Well it has been a couple of days and I see you have been active. Just to be clear, despite the wording, the above request was to request to please explain an administrative action. Thank you for your help and understanding. Jbh (talk) 10:51, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Apologies for the delay, I must have missed this thread in my notifications. The articles were kept as the sources were determined to be reliable enough to meet WP:NALBUMS. As to why the community considers it reliable, I would recommend asking at the reliable sources noticeboard for a wider review. If I can answer anything else, please let me know. Nakon 22:44, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for getting back to me. I was more interested in the quantity of coverage rather than the quality of sources ie the meaning of significant coverage as the community now considers it. My concern is that if significant is seen as one or two RS in total ie nothing else is out there not that only one or two are currently in the article, then I really need to adjust my judgement. I am not saying these were bad closes I just do not have enough experience here to have parsed community definitions vs my own ideas. (For instance I would judge significant coverage as being similar to the coverage received by a band with a charted album, in a major market rotation etc. - in other words a comparable standard rather than a lesser standard.) Any help understanding would be great. Jbh (talk) 23:15, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Generally, if there are at least two reliable sources, the criteria is met. Per the guidelines at WP:GNG, "significant coverage" refers to the quality of the sources rather than the number available. Nakon 00:27, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

OK. Thank you. That helps a lot. Jbh (talk) 00:32, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

DRV Heads up

Some IP has asked for a DRV, but since they didn't let you know I'm giving you a friendly heads-up. Reyk _YO! 13:52, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Deletion_review/Log/2015_April_13#Centre_for_Women.2C_Ageing_and_Media

Tech News: 2015-16

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

• You can read the latest news about VisualEditor.
• You can now use the new translation tool on 22 Wikipedias. You now see the tool the first time you create a new page.
• The list of bad user names on your wiki no longer works. The global list replaces it. You can ask to add rules for bad user names on Meta.

Problems

• Some wikis had issues on Wednesday.

Changes this week

• The new version of MediaWiki has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since April 8. It will be on non-Misplaced Pages wikis from April 14. It will be on all Wikipedias from April 15 (calendar).
• Developers will start to rename 1.5 million accounts on Wednesday. After that all accounts will be unique and will work on all wikis.
• All users can now test link previews ("Hovercards") on several Wikipedias.

Meetings

• You can join the next weekly meeting with the Editing team. During the meetings you can tell developers which bugs are the most important. The meeting will be on April 15 at 18:00 (UTC). See how to join.

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

16:40, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Invitation

I'd like to invite you to join the WikiProject R&B and Soul Music. We are currently on demand for new members, the project was dying, but with your help we can revive it and make it one of the best WikiProjects. Make me sure that you'll think about this and remember cooperative works can do amazing things. Regards Dfrr (talk) 19:56, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Facebook

Hi, Just wanted to pop by to say thanks for deleting the AFD - As soon as I Speedy Kept it it was deleted , I assumed he was a bit behind on the April Fools bollocks but who knows eh , Happy Editing, –Davey2010 01:24, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Hi Davey2010, just wanted to let you know I fixed your "grin" template. Now your grin can show Cheers! CookieMonster755 (talk) 05:28, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Not sure how one manages to bugger up a template but there we go , Anyway thanks :) –Davey2010 09:14, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Archamia fucata

Greetings. I was following up on a new article that I patrolled and found that it has been deleted because it was created by a band user. Obviously, I thought the article was worthwhile enough to be part of the encyclopedia but I understand that you probably have to enforce the ban on this user. Is there any way to resurrect this article put it onto a draft page in my user space and allow me to submit it as a new article? I don't even know this person who created the article and so there is no conflict of interest and I am not a sock puppet as you probably can tell from looking at my contribution history. Also I'd like to know if any other articles that this band user had submitted have been deleted and I would like to ask for the similar courtesy of resurrecting these articles so that I can submit them into main space. Let me apologize ahead of time if I'm asking something that goes against Misplaced Pages policy because at this point in time I have no idea whether I'm doing something wrong by even asking you to do this. I am submitting this request to you in good faith with the goal of improving and expanding the content of the encyclopedia. Best Regards,

  Bfpage |leave a message  13:13, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

I just found the drafts of these articles in the user space of this banned editor. Is it appropriate for me to remove them from the draft pages and resubmit them as articles in main space? Best regards,

The list of deleted articles is available in the section a few up on my talk page. If there are any on that list that you feel would still be appropriate, please check with User:OccultZone, as the content should be available in their userspace. Nakon 22:47, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Joseph2302 Block - Speedy Deletion

I just came upon a page (https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=For_muy_bien&action=history) that, as you can see through the linked history, Joseph put up for speedy deletion. This tag appears to have been removed by one of the original authors, but in my opinion the tag is valid. This is especially given the content in the last section which states information about two random people in Spanish class.

I was going to bring this to Joseph's attention, but as it appears he cannot do anything about it currently I was unsure of where to turn. As you were the admin who blocked, I am making the assumption that you can do something or pass it along to an appropriate admin.

Thank you very much for your consideration! WhistlingZebra (talk) 04:04, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, I've deleted the page. Nakon 15:38, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Southeast Ark-La-Tex

Can you please redelete this article? The result of the discussion was delete and it reappeared. Thanks! FieldMarine (talk) 10:27, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification. It's been redirected to Ark-La-Tex, which should be OK. Nakon 15:26, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Responding to Nakon's deletion of the article "Learning-Disadvantage Gap"

Hello Nakon,

I consider your deletion of the article "The Learning-Disadvantage Gap" a hasty and inappropriate decision as it was based on a single quote that was taken out of context from a 25 March 2015 talk page response in regards to the proposed deletion of this legitimate and informative article.

Please note in my quote, “The Learning-Disadvantage Gap is a collection of original articles,” of which you focused on, I was referring not to myself but rather to the authors of the two hundred verifiable reference articles.

The seventh paragraph of the same communication went on to address specifically these two hundred references as shown here. Here’s the quote: “he collection of two hundred plus references to the Gap consists of works by the U.S. Department of Education, K-12 teachers, principals, and district superintendents, university professors, and studies, parents and students, civil rights groups, court cases, constitutional attorneys, statistical groups, arts advocacy groups, and more. Just one reference alone includes a list of five hundred university professors who as a group are petitioning the U.S. Department of Education…”

The rest of my quote, “reliable separately published articles not yet compiled in a format easily accessible to the public,” explains that while these independently authored articles are currently and verifiably published and accessible to the public through various online and traditional sources, they are now compiled as a quick-read and convenient WP article.

I'm not making an appealing your decision here, asking only for future editor/administrator fairness and to be judged solely on how well the article itself abides by WP written policies. For all that has been said, I appreciate the opportunity to rewrite the article in our user-sandbox which will hopefully establish itself as a legitimate standalone WP article in the future. Thank you, as well as to Audacity, Four Violas, and others.

JCharlesThompson (talk) 01:49, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello, thank you for your comments. Please feel free to work on a new draft in your sandbox that addresses the issues outlined in the AFD discussion and submit it for reconsideration once you feel it's ready. Thanks, Nakon 02:00, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Deletion review for 2015 Los Angeles train crash

An editor has asked for a deletion review of 2015 Los Angeles train crash. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Juneau Mike (talk) 01:51, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification, I'll monitor the discussion. Nakon 02:46, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Your recent removal of my edit

Hello Nakon, After careful review I understand that the external links may not coincide with Misplaced Pages's terms, however the body of my edit did improve the previous description of the topics.

Thanks for the update. Please feel free to re-submit these edits without the links that were disputed. If you have any questions, please let me know. Nakon 02:47, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Toradex

Hi Nakon, I'd like you to reconsider your close of Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Toradex (2nd nomination). There was no consensus to keep. AfD should not be judged on head count but on truthful policy based arguments. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:54, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello, After reviewing this AFD, there was a clear consensus to keep the article. If you feel this was inappropriate, please use the deletion review process to review my close. Thanks, Nakon 02:48, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply, I've got to DRV. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:52, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification. Nakon 03:56, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Fix birthdate on Brandun DeShay page

Hi, you reverted back to an incorrect revision on this page https://en.wikipedia.org/Brandun_DeShay The birthdate should read "May 10, 1990" This is the correct revision date-------> ]

Can you please fix this? Thank you!

Hello, do you have a reference for this birthdate? Nakon 23:20, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Yes, this is the original and correct revision-------> ]

also, he says his age here in an interview--------> ] Yleonmgnt (talk) 08:02, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Youtube links are not considered a reliable source. Do you have any significant references showing the actual birthdate? Nakon 02:49, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

We only know his age from his interviews on Youtube. I helped create this article, so i would rather we have no birth-date rather than 1988 which is completely WRONG. Can we remove the incorrect birthdate? Thank you so much 23.242.241.58 (talk) 10:56, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Gobonobo Edit reversion

In the Minnesota section of "Education", I deleted the Quitno press' 'Smartest state' survey information from 2006. They are a publisher in KS that conducts data surveys of various data criteria of state governments, among the major categories are "Smartest State", "Most Dangerous State", "Most Dangerous City", "Most Dangerous Metro Area", "Most Livable State", "Healthiest State", and "Most Improved State". Further, their ranking of jurisdictions in terms of "safety" has been criticized for faulty methodology and inappropriate use of data by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the American Society of Criminology, and the U.S. Conference of Mayors.(1) Their methodology used in benchmarking educational systems is no better. And the title of 'Smartest state' is dubious at best even with only a minor glance at their 21 criteria of 'statistical analysis'--rather limited in scope: http://www.morganquitno.com/edfact06.htm#FACTORS More importantly, it is outdated. The 2009 information combed from the U.S. Census is hardly more current but it is reliable, accurate, and relevant. Even more noteworthy are the results of the survey conducted by National Center for Educational Statistics that I included. It proves that despite lower per student expenditures, the state of MN does provide sufficient skill in teaching Math and Science proficiency--an area that has recently garnered negative press for the country as a whole. Additionally, many states in the upper Midwest (including MN) can boast high marks in the SAT exams---this was not included in the original pre-edit section. However, I updated the ACTs average composite scores for MN students to reflect pertinent data as recent as 2014. User 'Gobonobo' reverted all of my edits, and explained in their summary that I had not included an explanation for my initial edits. I thought the edits spoke for themselves: they are accurate, current, and relevant. All sources were cited and are totally accurate and verifiable. You the be the judge.

(1). https://en.wikipedia.org/Morgan_Quitno_Press

Thank You,

Duluth501 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Duluth501 (talk • contribs) 03:11, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

WP:PERM/RV

Hi Nakon, I'd like to know why am I still remaining in WP:PERM/RV neither being approved nor being denied... I can also see that you have accepted the request of the editor who had asked two days after me. Please make your intentions clear. Regards --JAaron95 | Talk | Contribs 19:19, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello, while I don't feel that you have enough experience at this time, I'm leaving the request untouched should any other administrator wish to comment. Nakon 20:16, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi @Nakon:,Can you ask someone (admins who routinely check WP:PERM/RV) to say their opinion on my request. I don't think other admins will voluntarily post a comment on what you purposefully didn't touch. It seems they don't wanna mess with you . Regards --JAaron95 | Talk | Contribs 07:56, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of the page Ingele Juif Genial

Good day dear Nakon. I would like to know what was wrong with the page you deleted. I have never created an article before so I might have not followed the rules. I would like to know them. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leon1778 (talk • contribs) 07:42, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello, the article was tagged for deletion because it did not include an indication of why it was important. If you would be able to update the draft to include why the subject is notable, it may be submitted for review. If you have any further questions, please let me know. Thanks, Nakon 23:48, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-17

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

• There was sometimes a problem when saving a page in VisualEditor. It is now fixed on all wikis.
• VisualEditor sometimes showed empty warnings for wikis using Flagged Revisions. This is now fixed on all wikis.
• You can get the new version of the Misplaced Pages app for iOS. With it you can share facts with your friends.
• If you write JavaScript, you should stop using importScript and importStylesheet.

Problems

• There was a problem with Labs on Monday.

Changes this week

• The new version of MediaWiki has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since April 15. It will be on non-Misplaced Pages wikis from April 21. It will be on all Wikipedias from April 22 (calendar).
• Developers are renaming 1.5 million accounts. After that all accounts will be unique and will work on all wikis.
• If your wiki has the auto-fill tool for citations, you can now use it when you edit a reference.
• You can now give examples for template options in TemplateData.

Meetings

• You can join the next weekly meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs are the most important. The meeting will be on April 22 at 18:00 (UTC). See how to join.

Future changes

• You will soon be able to add and remove tags on edits.

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

15:30, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

OccultZone

Hi Nakon - I've made an offer to OccultZone, which I believe is in keeping with your re-block. If he agrees to that, I'd be willing to unblock - but would like to hear any thoughts. Worm(talk) 07:44, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

My unblock is currently set to expire within 24 hours as it was just a re-block of their initial block. I don't feel that an unblock before 2015-04-22T18:36:30 would be beneficial. Nakon 07:47, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

As per their additional comments, I am strongly against an unblock as the editor clearly does not understand the reason behind the re-block. Nakon 07:53, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

So am I, don't worry I won't be unblocking. Worm(talk) 07:57, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, Nakon 07:58, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Page protection

Could you semi-protect the article on Kai Budde. It seems to be our IP hopper's next target. Thanks in advance. Sir Sputnik (talk) 08:20, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

 Done Nakon 08:21, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

And they've moved on to Josh Utter-Leyton. Would you mind semi-protecting that article as well. Thanks. Sir Sputnik (talk) 04:22, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Restore

the hailey Baldwin page that you deleted should be re-instated — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.228.73.77 (talk) 16:42, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello, please submit a request at WP:REFUND to have this page undeleted. Thanks, Nakon 23:19, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Krank Amps

Hi, it looks like you deleted the Krank Amps page with conflicting reports about it being open or closed. the business has been reacquired by the original owner and is OPEN. ANy change you can undelete? You can contact owner Tony Krank at tonykrank@krankamps.com http://en.wikipedia.org/Krank_Amplification Thanks 71.209.189.90 (talk) 03:35, 23 April 2015 (UTC)Tony Krank

Hello, the deletion discussion was closed as a delete after two weeks of comments. Unfortunately, I will not be able to reverse this decision at this time. If you have significant, substantial evidence that the subject is now notable, please submit a request at the deletion review page and the discussion can be reviewed. Thanks, Nakon 03:38, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Sahil Rayyan at AfD

No problem with the deletion of Sahil Rayyan, as done by you per Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/Sahil_Rayyan. However, I must have missed the preceding events involving a contested PROD as well as the AfD nom, despite it being on my watchlist - too busy elsewhere, I guess.

Is there any chance you could let me know (a) who contested the PROD and (b) what rationale they used (if any). I'm not intending to go have a word with them but there is some background stuff going on and the info might prove to be useful at a later date. - Sitush (talk) 04:31, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

The PROD was contested by Pankajclub1 (talk · contribs) and the rationale was "everything is perfect". Nakon 04:34, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Ok, thanks very much. - Sitush (talk) 05:11, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Admin

Yeah. No problems re: Adminship. --One Salient Oversight (talk) 07:01, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Review of admin actions and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted in most arbitration pages please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 08:33, 23 April 2015 (UTC)