| Revision as of 19:54, 26 April 2015 view sourceLightbreather (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,672 edits →Blocked: unblock request← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:09, 26 April 2015 view source Salvio giuliano (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators49,148 edits →Blocked: cmt,Next edit → | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| *I'm not sure this block is purely over the outing concern — I see on AN that there are other concerns — but if it is, I think it's excessive. I saw the post before it was suppressed, and of course I don't want to discuss any details of it, but IMO a warning would do. ] | ] 19:51, 26 April 2015 (UTC). | *I'm not sure this block is purely over the outing concern — I see on AN that there are other concerns — but if it is, I think it's excessive. I saw the post before it was suppressed, and of course I don't want to discuss any details of it, but IMO a warning would do. ] | ] 19:51, 26 April 2015 (UTC). | ||
| **On second thoughts, it's probably fairer to describe Lightbreather's conduct as a way to harass another editor all the while being able to claim deniability. Either way, I believe a block is necessary. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em;" class="texhtml"> ''']'''</span> ] 20:09, 26 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
| {{unblock | reason=Can someone get involved privately? I've got an email from Salvio - this was no outing. I am getting ready to go to my son's house, but I will check in if I can via phone, otherwise I'll be home later. ] (]) 19:54, 26 April 2015 (UTC)}} | {{unblock | reason=Can someone get involved privately? I've got an email from Salvio - this was no outing. I am getting ready to go to my son's house, but I will check in if I can via phone, otherwise I'll be home later. ] (]) 19:54, 26 April 2015 (UTC)}} | ||
Revision as of 20:09, 26 April 2015
Kaffeeklatsch update
I have archived the Kaffeeklatsch discussions that were here. All the brouhaha had died down. If it fires up again in the future, I'll take care of it then. Lightbreather (talk) 00:22, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Nazi gun control theory
I have just asked you to let me voice my own opinions on the subject of the article - which clearly does not amount to a request for you to trawl through my previous posts and copy them there. So unless it is actually your intention to get into an argument with everyone on the talk page, I'd ask that you remove your latest post, and stop trying to tell people what I think. Not only is it bad manners (particularly after I'd made an explicit request not to do it), but it is counterproductive, since it looks very much like an attempt to turn the whole thing into an us-vs-them faction-fight, rather than a discussion of how Misplaced Pages policy relates to the issue. Your suggestion of an RfC was misguided in my opinion, and you might do better to simply let the discussion evolve, rather than trying to corral everyone into an entirely inappropriate vote. AndyTheGrump (talk) 01:37, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Civility in the Talk:Nazi gun control theory
The discussion should remain civil. I would appreciate it if you would stop using the term "Godsy-preffered", because it conveys that you know what I'd prefer (which you do not) AND incorrectly conveys my actual positions or speculates to what they might be. I do not advocate a personal view, I advocate policy (they may not necessarily line up), so to use the phrase it in that manner is inaccurate. —GodsyCONT) 20:56, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- So if we don't go back to your preferred version in your preferred way, you believe it will be detrimental to the discussion. That's not quite how it works here, but thanks for the input. trying to illustrate a point, not intentionally being sarcastic or claiming to know what you believe/think 01:37, 19 April 2015 (UTC), Godsy
- Your "preferred" comment preceded mine by 18 hours. I think you should cool down and go read some of the past material about this Nazi-gun-control debate on Misplaced Pages.
- Please stay off my page for now, unless you come to give notice of starting a formal process. Lightbreather (talk) 21:04, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
AN notice
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Grognard Extraordinaire Chess (talk) Ping when replying 03:39, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- The discussion Chess started: indef gun control ban for User:Lightbreather
Yet more insinuations of sockpuppetry
I see that you have yet again ignored my advice, and the comments in the thread regarding your behaviour at WP:AN, and have continued to make unsubstantiated accusations of sockpuppetry at Talk:Nazi gun control theory. Consider this fair warning - if you persist with this, I may very well change my position regarding the proposal that you be topic banned. You are achieving precisely nothing beyond antagonising people. Either file a SPI, or let the matter drop. AndyTheGrump (talk) 18:53, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Blocked
I have just blocked you for violating the WP:OUTING policy in your post on AN I just suppressed. If you want to appeal this block, please use the {{unblock}} template. Salvio 19:30, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Salvio giuliano, can you tell me (email, I guess) what I "outed"? Lightbreather (talk) 19:34, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Mail sent. Salvio 19:38, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- I'm not sure this block is purely over the outing concern — I see on AN that there are other concerns — but if it is, I think it's excessive. I saw the post before it was suppressed, and of course I don't want to discuss any details of it, but IMO a warning would do. Bishonen | talk 19:51, 26 April 2015 (UTC).
- On second thoughts, it's probably fairer to describe Lightbreather's conduct as a way to harass another editor all the while being able to claim deniability. Either way, I believe a block is necessary. Salvio 20:09, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Lightbreather (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Can someone get involved privately? I've got an email from Salvio - this was no outing. I am getting ready to go to my son's house, but I will check in if I can via phone, otherwise I'll be home later. Lightbreather (talk) 19:54, 26 April 2015 (UTC)Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Can someone get involved privately? I've got an email from Salvio - this was no outing. I am getting ready to go to my son's house, but I will check in if I can via phone, otherwise I'll be home later. ] (]) 19:54, 26 April 2015 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=Can someone get involved privately? I've got an email from Salvio - this was no outing. I am getting ready to go to my son's house, but I will check in if I can via phone, otherwise I'll be home later. ] (]) 19:54, 26 April 2015 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=Can someone get involved privately? I've got an email from Salvio - this was no outing. I am getting ready to go to my son's house, but I will check in if I can via phone, otherwise I'll be home later. ] (]) 19:54, 26 April 2015 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}