Misplaced Pages

Talk:Ravi Shankar: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:53, 5 October 2014 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,297 editsm Signing comment by 82.10.206.106 - "→Anoushka--absurd statement: "← Previous edit Revision as of 17:59, 3 May 2015 edit undo103.242.217.46 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 30: Line 30:


{{ITN talk|12 December|2012}} {{ITN talk|12 December|2012}}

==Two Birthplaces?==

Intro paragraph says he was born in Narail, which is in present-day Bangladesh, while in the Early Life section it says he was born in Benares, a city in India. I think the fact is that his father was from Narail, and the family was living in Benares at that time.


== KBE == == KBE ==

Revision as of 17:59, 3 May 2015

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ravi Shankar article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 6 months 
Good articleRavi Shankar has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 5, 2009Good article nomineeListed
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconBiography: Musicians
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as High-importance).
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconCalifornia: Southern California Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Southern California task force (assessed as Low-importance).
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconComposers
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the WikiProject Composers, a group of editors writing and developing biographical articles about composers of all eras and styles. The project discussion page is the place to talk about technical and editorial issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!ComposersWikipedia:WikiProject ComposersTemplate:WikiProject ComposersComposers
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconIndia: Uttar Pradesh / Music Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Uttar Pradesh (assessed as Mid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Indian music workgroup (assessed as Top-importance).
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconRecord Production
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Production; a collaborative effort to improve Misplaced Pages's documentation of Record Production articles. Questions or comments related to record production and related articles are welcome at the project's talk page. Anyone interested may join the project: add your name to the list of project members!Record ProductionWikipedia:WikiProject Record ProductionTemplate:WikiProject Record ProductionRecord Production
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconThe Beatles High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis Apple Records/Apple Corps-related article is within the scope of WikiProject The Beatles, which focuses on improving coverage of English rock band The Beatles and related topics on Misplaced Pages. Users who are willing to participate in the project should visit the project page, where they can join and see a list of open tasks.The BeatlesWikipedia:WikiProject The BeatlesTemplate:WikiProject The BeatlesThe Beatles
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
To-do list:
For WikiProject The Beatles

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.


Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

This article does not yet have a related to do list. If you can think of any ways to improve the article, why not create one?
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconUniversity of California Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject University of California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to University of California, its history, accomplishments and other topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject University of CaliforniaUniversity of California
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ravi Shankar article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 6 months 

Template:Stable version Template:Vital article

In the newsA news item involving Ravi Shankar was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the In the news section on 12 December 2012.
Misplaced Pages
Misplaced Pages

Two Birthplaces?

Intro paragraph says he was born in Narail, which is in present-day Bangladesh, while in the Early Life section it says he was born in Benares, a city in India. I think the fact is that his father was from Narail, and the family was living in Benares at that time.

KBE

Note: I moved this here so it's not spread across user talk pages Hekerui (talk) 23:50, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi. With regards to this edit: does it matter that he did not use it? He still had the title. And also, what evidence do we have that he did not want to use the title? As far as I can see e.g. here external sources mention his KBE. Thanks, --Mark91it's my world 23:20, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

He has so many titles, we would have to list his honorary doctorates, which are actual titles, and, because they much higher honors and from his home country, maybe list him as Padmavibhushan Ravi Shankar or Bharatratna Ravi Shankar (the Bharat Ratna even puts you in the order of precedence). When I google "ravi shankar kbe", the honorary knighthood mention of the UK Parliament is about all that pops up and the recent obituary flood does not appear to mention him as a KBE but mentions title separately if at all. Hekerui (talk) 23:50, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
It's just that it seems conventional to list these type of titles (see e.g. C. V. Raman who is in the same situation). Do you know if there's a policy about this? --Mark91it's my world 23:58, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
WP:POSTNOM and MOS:HONORIFIC are the closest things we have to policy regarding this. Evanh2008  23:15, 15 December 2012 (UTC)


Pundit

The name should be Pundit Ravi Shankar, that is how he is known. There is hardly anybody who ever knew of him as just Ravi Hsnakar (There may be thousands of Ravi Shankar at any given time) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.214.251.14 (talk) 10:32, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Superb images

The Daily Mail is usually spurned as a source here, but the range and quality of the images they have used in their article here is quite something: . Almost worthy of adding as an external link. Martinevans123 (talk) 23:57, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages policy recommends recent pictures but this should not apply for people who are no more living. In fact for many of them, e.g. Eric Hobsbawm or Claude Levi-Strauss, the so called 'recent images' are obtained just prior of death and of course they look awful. The rule should be skipped also for rock or movie stars - seeing them in old age does not help to understand what their fame was.91.92.179.172 (talk) 15:49, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

I think the image you have now added is a better one. But I'm not convinced by your home-spun advice regarding "rock or movie stars". All this, however, does nothing to lessen the sharp contrast between the dubious quality of the few images we have available here and the wonderful collection published, as a worthy celebration, by the DM. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:23, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

1956-69: International career section

In the fourth para of this section, there's a mention of Howard Worth's Raga being filmed during George Harrison's visit to India in Sept–Oct 1966; that's supported by a NY Times ref, which I'm not able to access. Would be good if someone could check perhaps, because I've always understood it that Raga was filmed mainly in 1967–68. In his autobiography, George says he was meant to join Ravi in the south of India after The Beatles' (well, him and Lennon) left Rishikesh in April 1968 (i.e., two Indian trips later); but George got dysentery, which is why his scene with Ravi had to be shot later, at Esalen in June '68. Having said that, this is only the Harrison side of things – perhaps shooting did begin in 1966?) Also, might be worth mentioning that Harrison salvaged the project (by offering Apple Films and producing the soundtrack) in late 1970, when the original backers pulled out? Howard Worth's very generous about this, from memory, in a talk he gave for the 2010 re-release. (It's a long clip, but lovely if you're in the mood – and have the time.) JG66 (talk) 14:04, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Anoushka--absurd statement

The article says: "After separating from Kamala Shastri in 1981, Anoushka Shankar was born to Shankar and Sukanya Rajan."
How could Anoushka Shankar have separated from anybody before she was born? Uporządnicki (talk) 19:17, 15 November 2013 (UTC) Now says "After Shankar separated from Kamala Shastri in 1981, Anoushka Shankar was born to Shankar and Sukanya Rajan", Anoushka's birth is given as 9th June 1981, if you are understandable trying to gloss over a little hanky-panky in the man's life, which is not relevant to his artistry only to a gossip mag , why not remove the whole statement altogether? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.10.206.106 (talk) 15:52, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Hans Neuhoff material

I see that material by Hans Neuhoff was removed and then readded. I would leave this material out since Hans Neuhoff is non notable. --Malerooster (talk) 14:58, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

What do you mean by "non notable"? Musik in Geschichte und Gegenwart is the kind of sources that are relevant for music articles, isn't it?--Phso2 (talk) 21:31, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Who is Hans Neuhoff? Why is his opinion note worthy? --Malerooster (talk) 23:54, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
He is notable enough to have written an article in a reference encyclopedia. Anyway, there is no wonder that a musician with no strong classical music training can be labelled as having an amateurish use of orchestra...Do you intend to remove any kind of criticism from the article?--Phso2 (talk) 07:03, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Categories: