Misplaced Pages

User talk:!: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:53, 26 July 2006 view source! (talk | contribs)93 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 00:11, 27 July 2006 view source RadioKirk (talk | contribs)18,518 edits replyNext edit →
Line 50: Line 50:


{{unblock|i have been wrongly accused}} {{unblock|i have been wrongly accused}}

:—something you've never said to anyone else—recalls , and . Your introduction out of nowhere recalled (among others) as well. Your unblock request and denial of sockpuppetry recall (previously noted), and . The evidence is convincing.
:If you still believe you're being wrongly accused, send an e-mail to radiokirk(at)fastmail(dot)fm. <tt style="color:#161;">RadioKirk<small> (]|]|])</small></tt> 00:11, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:11, 27 July 2006

Welcome to the Misplaced Pages

Here are some links I thought useful:

Feel free to contact me personally with any questions you might have. The Misplaced Pages:Village pump is also a good place to go for quick answers to general questions. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~.

Be Bold!

] 12:02, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)-

Hello

if you have any questions feel free to ask me --Family Guy 03:46, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Man!

Awesome name, dude! Flip Merav 21 00:09, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

I know your secret

Prince, is that you? --Chapium 02:17, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Wow!

First edit in six months, and you say hello to me? To what do I owe the honor? :) RadioKirk (u|t|c) 23:06, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Question

according to your recent contributions, you have come to believe that i am someone else - a marytrott? i am not this person nor do i understand the accusation.

above edit is directed towards radiokirk

also... why am i blocked?

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

! (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

i have been wrongly accused

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=i have been wrongly accused |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=i have been wrongly accused |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=i have been wrongly accused |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
This edit—something you've never said to anyone else—recalls this, this and this. Your introduction out of nowhere recalled this edit (among others) as well. Your unblock request and denial of sockpuppetry recall this (previously noted), this and this. The evidence is convincing.
If you still believe you're being wrongly accused, send an e-mail to radiokirk(at)fastmail(dot)fm. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 00:11, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Category: