| Revision as of 02:43, 4 May 2015 editAgtx (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers13,569 edits Warning: Removal of content, blanking on Megatrend University. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:58, 4 May 2015 edit undoAgtx (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers13,569 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| ] Please stop your ]. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Misplaced Pages, as you did at ], you may be ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete3 --> ] (]) 02:43, 4 May 2015 (UTC) | ] Please stop your ]. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Misplaced Pages, as you did at ], you may be ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete3 --> ] (]) 02:43, 4 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
| :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | ||
| ==]== | |||
| Look, I don't have an axe to grind here. I'm not affiliated with this school, and I don't know if the article is biased or not. What I do know is that just deleting out the whole page, especially with good sources like the New York Times, isn't a good way to get what you're looking for. If you think the article is biased, then by all means, try to fix it. Rewrite sections. Add more sources. But just deleting the whole thing? That's not how it works. If you want to discuss this with the other folks editing the article, go ahead and post on ], and I'm sure you can come to an agreement. | |||
| ] (]) 02:58, 4 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:58, 4 May 2015
May 2015
Hello, I'm Agtx. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Megatrend University without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Agtx (talk) 02:24, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Misplaced Pages, as you did at Megatrend University, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Agtx (talk) 02:43, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Megatrend University
Look, I don't have an axe to grind here. I'm not affiliated with this school, and I don't know if the article is biased or not. What I do know is that just deleting out the whole page, especially with good sources like the New York Times, isn't a good way to get what you're looking for. If you think the article is biased, then by all means, try to fix it. Rewrite sections. Add more sources. But just deleting the whole thing? That's not how it works. If you want to discuss this with the other folks editing the article, go ahead and post on talk:Megatrend University, and I'm sure you can come to an agreement. Agtx (talk) 02:58, 4 May 2015 (UTC)