| Revision as of 20:16, 4 May 2015 editQuackGuru (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users79,978 edits →Thanks: I think the confusing essay should be deleted.← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:28, 5 May 2015 edit undoQuackGuru (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users79,978 edits →The dispute has bubbled over to ArbCom: See Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Complementary and Alternative Medicine.Next edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| :The essay has little focus. I think the real question is what is an advocacy duck? The original essay was accusing others who closely follow WP policy of having a COI. I noticed the new essay has been improved recently but I don't see how it can help anyone. The new essay says "COI ducks are ducks of a different color." That does not make sense. The essay seems to claim that a duck is an editor who has a COI. ] (]) 04:21, 28 April 2015 (UTC) | :The essay has little focus. I think the real question is what is an advocacy duck? The original essay was accusing others who closely follow WP policy of having a COI. I noticed the new essay has been improved recently but I don't see how it can help anyone. The new essay says "COI ducks are ducks of a different color." That does not make sense. The essay seems to claim that a duck is an editor who has a COI. ] (]) 04:21, 28 April 2015 (UTC) | ||
| :] after reading I think the confusing essay should be deleted. The essay is being (mis)used to make accusations against others. ] (]) 04:30, 29 April 2015 (UTC) | :] after reading I think the confusing essay should be deleted. The essay is being (mis)used to make accusations against others. ] (]) 04:30, 29 April 2015 (UTC) | ||
| == The dispute has bubbled over to ArbCom == | |||
| See ]. ] (]) 03:27, 5 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:28, 5 May 2015
| This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:QuackGuru. |
Thanks
Thanks for the tip about WP:QUACKS, and I appreciate the advice to leave the essay alone. When you edited the essay, the changes I'd put in had already been reverted. Some have been put back in but I think my version was better than what's there now - or as better as this essay can get. Given that there's still pressure to make it about finding Wifione-type editors and at least one editor is (mis)using the essay to claim that editors at Organic food are advocates because they're against this editor, I don't see much hope for it. I don't necessarily think it'll be deleted if it goes to mainspace but I also don't think it's that useful since it doesn't fill much of a gap. I've done what I could to improve it and I don't see the point in trying to make it better now so I'm done with it. Anyways, thanks again. Ca2james (talk) 03:10, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- The essay has little focus. I think the real question is what is an advocacy duck? The original essay was accusing others who closely follow WP policy of having a COI. I noticed the new essay has been improved recently but I don't see how it can help anyone. The new essay says "COI ducks are ducks of a different color." That does not make sense. The essay seems to claim that a duck is an editor who has a COI. QuackGuru (talk) 04:21, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- User:Ca2james after reading this comment I think the confusing essay should be deleted. The essay is being (mis)used to make accusations against others. QuackGuru (talk) 04:30, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
The dispute has bubbled over to ArbCom
See Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Complementary and Alternative Medicine. QuackGuru (talk) 03:27, 5 May 2015 (UTC)