Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Lightbreather/Workshop: Difference between revisions

< Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration | Requests | Case | Lightbreather Browse history interactively Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 00:48, 3 May 2015 editL235 (talk \| contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators27,345 edits opening case		Revision as of 08:44, 7 May 2015 edit undoDoug Weller (talk \| contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Oversighters, Administrators263,857 edits →top: sectioned discussion only pleaseNext edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Casenav}}		{{Casenav}}
			{{tmbox
			\| type = content
			\| image = ]
			\| text = <center><big>'''Comments on this page are to be sectioned, not threaded. With the exception of arbitrators and clerks, all editors must create a section for their statement and <u>comment only in their own section</u>.</big></center>
			}}

Revision as of 08:44, 7 May 2015

Main case page (Talk) — Evidence (Talk) — Workshop (Talk) — Proposed decision (Talk)

Case clerk: TBD Drafting arbitrator: TBD

Misplaced Pages Arbitration

About arbitration Talk Arbitration policy (CU/OS) Guide to arbitration Noticeboard + Talk Search archived proceedings Ban appeals Report
Open proceedings All open requests Case requests Clarification and Amendment requests Arbitrator motion requests Enforcement requests
Active sanctions Contentious topics (Log) General sanctions Editor sanctions
Arbitration Committee Discuss + Contact Members Procedures Elections Talk History Clerks + Talk Clerk procedures Conflict of interest reports
Audit Talk Statistics Talk Reports (pre-2016)

Track related changes
v t e

Behaviour on this page: Arbitration case pages exist to assist the Arbitration Committee in arriving at a fair, well-informed decision. You are required to act with appropriate decorum during this case. While grievances must often be aired during a case, you are expected to air them without being rude or hostile, and to respond calmly to allegations against you. Accusations of misbehaviour posted in this case must be proven with clear evidence (and otherwise not made at all). Editors who conduct themselves inappropriately during a case may be sanctioned by an arbitrator or clerk, without further warning, by being banned from further participation in the case, or being blocked altogether. Personal attacks against other users, including arbitrators or clerks, will be met with sanctions. Behavior during a case may also be considered by the committee in arriving at a final decision.

Comments on this page are to be sectioned, not threaded. With the exception of arbitrators and clerks, all editors must create a section for their statement and comment only in their own section.