| Revision as of 14:15, 13 May 2015 editKheider (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers31,885 edits *'''Keep''': Since it is in resonance with Mars.← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:51, 17 May 2015 edit undoKheider (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers31,885 edits WP:NASTRO is merely a guideline and should not be used to remove borderline asteroids and commit needless genocide. The main-belt asteroid problem was created by bots and should not be over corrected.Next edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| * '''Redirect''' per ]; insufficient sources found. ] (]) 17:49, 12 May 2015 (UTC) | * '''Redirect''' per ]; insufficient sources found. ] (]) 17:49, 12 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Weak redirect'''. Apparently it's one of the larger objects in a 1:2 resonance with Mars . But that paper doesn't have much other information about this object and I didn't find others. —] (]) 19:51, 12 May 2015 (UTC) | *'''Weak redirect'''. Apparently it's one of the larger objects in a 1:2 resonance with Mars . But that paper doesn't have much other information about this object and I didn't find others. —] (]) 19:51, 12 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''': Since it is in resonance with Mars. -- ] (]) 14:15, 13 May 2015 (UTC) | *'''Keep''': Since it is in resonance with Mars. WP:NASTRO is merely a guideline and should not be used to remove borderline asteroids and commit needless genocide. The main-belt asteroid problem was created by bots and should not be over corrected. -- ] (]) 14:15, 13 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:51, 17 May 2015
2798 Vergilius
- 2798 Vergilius (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG, but as a low-numbered asteroid, consensus is that it is well-discussed rather than redirected unilaterally. I think it should be deleted; or (preferably) redirected to List of minor planets: 2001–3000 per NASTRO's guidelines. Boleyn (talk) 08:44, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America 09:10, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect per WP:DWMP; insufficient sources found. Praemonitus (talk) 17:49, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
- Weak redirect. Apparently it's one of the larger objects in a 1:2 resonance with Mars . But that paper doesn't have much other information about this object and I didn't find others. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:51, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Since it is in resonance with Mars. WP:NASTRO is merely a guideline and should not be used to remove borderline asteroids and commit needless genocide. The main-belt asteroid problem was created by bots and should not be over corrected. -- Kheider (talk) 14:15, 13 May 2015 (UTC)