| Revision as of 18:41, 15 October 2004 editBradeos Graphon (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users24,171 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:09, 16 October 2004 edit undoAWilliamson (talk | contribs)274 edits Cross-Dresser articleNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| == New messages == | == New messages == | ||
| == Cross-Dresser article == | |||
| I thank you for being willing to get involved with the ] dispute, and for your comments in the discussion area; although I would like to make one more request. The phrase "by a religious court" doesn't make clear that all of the clergy chosen for the tribunal were selected by the English from among their own partisans. If you need evidence, you can see a summary of some of the relevant documents at: ] | |||
| Although I don't want to bother you further, changing that phrase to read: "by a pro-English religious court" would clarify the situation, and would be greatly appreciated. <BR>Many thanks for your time and consideration. ] 16:09, 16 Oct 2004 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:09, 16 October 2004
User talk:Fire Star Archive 1 February-June 2004.
User talk:Fire Star Archive 2 July-August 2004.
User talk:Fire Star Archive 3 August-September 2004.
User talk:Fire Star Archive 4 September-October 2004.
New messages
Cross-Dresser article
I thank you for being willing to get involved with the Cross-dresser dispute, and for your comments in the discussion area; although I would like to make one more request. The phrase "by a religious court" doesn't make clear that all of the clergy chosen for the tribunal were selected by the English from among their own partisans. If you need evidence, you can see a summary of some of the relevant documents at:
Although I don't want to bother you further, changing that phrase to read: "by a pro-English religious court" would clarify the situation, and would be greatly appreciated.
Many thanks for your time and consideration. AWilliamson 16:09, 16 Oct 2004 (UTC)