Misplaced Pages

Loki's wager: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:40, 1 April 2015 edit72.12.205.35 (talk) and the AfD also left open the possibility of a redirect; the Loki page is used to cover Loki's in the Eddas, the sole usable content of this page is from the Edda Resenii, so I'm leaving it as a redirect to that section in anticipation of its creation← Previous edit Revision as of 02:13, 21 May 2015 edit undoKendrick7 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users22,315 edits revertNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Refimprove|date=April 2011}} <!-- See talk. -->
#REDIRECT ]
'''Loki's Wager''', a form of ], is the unreasonable insistence that a concept cannot be defined, and therefore cannot be discussed.<ref>{{cite book
|title=Concise Handbook of Literary and Rhetorical Terms
|first=Michael S.
|last=Mills
|page=126
|location=Lexington, KY
|isbn=978-0-615-27136-1
|publisher=Estep-Nichols
|year=2010}}</ref>

] is a ] or ] in ], who, ], once made a bet with some dwarves. It was agreed that the price, should Loki lose the wager, would be his head. Loki lost the bet, and in due time the dwarves came to collect the head which had become rightfully theirs. Loki had no problem with giving up his head, but he insisted they had absolutely no right to take any part of his neck. Everyone concerned discussed the matter; certain parts were obviously head, and certain parts were obviously neck, but neither side could agree ''exactly'' where the one ended and the other began. As a result, Loki keeps his head indefinitely (although in the specific example, he got his lips stitched shut as payback for getting out of the bet with tricky wordplay).

One may overcome the fallacy either by establishing a reasonable, working definition of the term in issue, or by showing that the other party is being unreasonable and avoiding the argument.<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.toolkitforthinking.com/critical-thinking/anatomy-of-an-argument/denial-arguments/loki-s-wager
|title=Loki's Wager
|publisher=Toolkit For Thinking}}</ref>

==See also==
* ]
* ]
* ]
* '']'' — A similar argument over a pound of flesh erupts at the end of the play, wherein a character who had been promised a pound of flesh is allowed to collect only on the condition that he sheds no blood, which was not part of the bargain
* ] — the use of the fallacy as a plot device
* ]
* ]

==References==
{{reflist}}

{{Informal Fallacy}}

]
]

Revision as of 02:13, 21 May 2015

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Loki's wager" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (April 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Loki's Wager, a form of logical fallacy, is the unreasonable insistence that a concept cannot be defined, and therefore cannot be discussed.

Loki is a Jötunn or Áss in Norse mythology, who, legend has it, once made a bet with some dwarves. It was agreed that the price, should Loki lose the wager, would be his head. Loki lost the bet, and in due time the dwarves came to collect the head which had become rightfully theirs. Loki had no problem with giving up his head, but he insisted they had absolutely no right to take any part of his neck. Everyone concerned discussed the matter; certain parts were obviously head, and certain parts were obviously neck, but neither side could agree exactly where the one ended and the other began. As a result, Loki keeps his head indefinitely (although in the specific example, he got his lips stitched shut as payback for getting out of the bet with tricky wordplay).

One may overcome the fallacy either by establishing a reasonable, working definition of the term in issue, or by showing that the other party is being unreasonable and avoiding the argument.

See also

References

  1. Mills, Michael S. (2010). Concise Handbook of Literary and Rhetorical Terms. Lexington, KY: Estep-Nichols. p. 126. ISBN 978-0-615-27136-1.
  2. "Loki's Wager". Toolkit For Thinking.
Common fallacies (list)
Formal
In propositional logic
In quantificational logic
Syllogistic fallacy
Informal
Equivocation
Question-begging
Correlative-based
Illicit transference
Secundum quid
Faulty generalization
Ambiguity
Questionable cause
Appeals
Consequences
Emotion
Genetic fallacy
Ad hominem
Other fallacies
of relevance
Arguments
Categories: