Revision as of 03:40, 1 April 2015 edit72.12.205.35 (talk) and the AfD also left open the possibility of a redirect; the Loki page is used to cover Loki's in the Eddas, the sole usable content of this page is from the Edda Resenii, so I'm leaving it as a redirect to that section in anticipation of its creation← Previous edit |
Revision as of 02:13, 21 May 2015 edit undoKendrick7 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users22,315 edits revertNext edit → |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Refimprove|date=April 2011}} <!-- See talk. --> |
|
#REDIRECT ] |
|
|
|
'''Loki's Wager''', a form of ], is the unreasonable insistence that a concept cannot be defined, and therefore cannot be discussed.<ref>{{cite book |
|
|
|title=Concise Handbook of Literary and Rhetorical Terms |
|
|
|first=Michael S. |
|
|
|last=Mills |
|
|
|page=126 |
|
|
|location=Lexington, KY |
|
|
|isbn=978-0-615-27136-1 |
|
|
|publisher=Estep-Nichols |
|
|
|year=2010}}</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
] is a ] or ] in ], who, ], once made a bet with some dwarves. It was agreed that the price, should Loki lose the wager, would be his head. Loki lost the bet, and in due time the dwarves came to collect the head which had become rightfully theirs. Loki had no problem with giving up his head, but he insisted they had absolutely no right to take any part of his neck. Everyone concerned discussed the matter; certain parts were obviously head, and certain parts were obviously neck, but neither side could agree ''exactly'' where the one ended and the other began. As a result, Loki keeps his head indefinitely (although in the specific example, he got his lips stitched shut as payback for getting out of the bet with tricky wordplay). |
|
|
|
|
|
One may overcome the fallacy either by establishing a reasonable, working definition of the term in issue, or by showing that the other party is being unreasonable and avoiding the argument.<ref>{{cite web |
|
|
|url=http://www.toolkitforthinking.com/critical-thinking/anatomy-of-an-argument/denial-arguments/loki-s-wager |
|
|
|title=Loki's Wager |
|
|
|publisher=Toolkit For Thinking}}</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
==See also== |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* '']'' — A similar argument over a pound of flesh erupts at the end of the play, wherein a character who had been promised a pound of flesh is allowed to collect only on the condition that he sheds no blood, which was not part of the bargain |
|
|
* ] — the use of the fallacy as a plot device |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
|
|
|
==References== |
|
|
{{reflist}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{Informal Fallacy}} |
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
One may overcome the fallacy either by establishing a reasonable, working definition of the term in issue, or by showing that the other party is being unreasonable and avoiding the argument.