Misplaced Pages

:Sandbox: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:45, 22 May 2015 edit137.150.100.205 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 17:46, 22 May 2015 edit undo137.150.100.205 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 6: Line 6:
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■--> ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■-->



You know thats kind of confusing for a S..
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


33x

.




Optica!

Ben T. Ito

April 22, 2015

.

This paper will analyze the wave theory of light.

.

1. Introduction.

.

The wave theory of light is based on light waves formed by the motion of an optical ether, composed of matter, yet light propagates in vacuum that is void of matter which contradicts the wave theory of light. Michelson tests for Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter, but the result was negative. Lorentz reverses the negative result of Michelson's experiment to justify the ether but light propagating in vacuum is definitive and irreversible experimental proof the optical ether, composed of matter, does not exist. Maxwell EM theory is introduced since induction forms in vacuum but Faraday's induction effect is not luminous. Poynting supports Maxwell's theory by deriving an EM energy equation of light but Poynting's current wire is also not luminous. Hertz structurally unites light with induction but Hertz's spark gap emits electrons. The production of light is always accompanied by the emission of electrons yet induction is not an ionization effect which contradicts Maxwell's induction analogy.

.

.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

.

.

2. Maxwell

.

.

In Maxwell's paper, "Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field" (1864), Maxwell's describes an electromagnetic theory of light based on Faraday induction effect.

"If, therefore, the phenomena described by Faraday in the Ninth Series of his Experimental Researches were the only known facts about electric currents, the laws of Ampere relating to the attraction of conductors carrying currents as well as those of Faraday about the mutual induction of currents, might be deduced by mechanical reasoning." (Maxwell, part II).

.

"ELECTROMAGNETIC THEORY OF LIGHT" (Maxwell, Part VI).

.


Maxwell's theory is based on Faraday's induction effect that is not luminous. Hertz's attempts to structurally unite light with induction but Hertz's spark gap emits electrons. Planck uses the blackbody radiation effect to support Maxwell's theory but the blackbody also emits electrons yet induction is not an ionization effect. Furthermore, Maxwell's external electric field conflicts with Faraday's induction effect that only represents an external magnetic field.

.

.

---------------------------------------------

.

.


3. Conclusion

.

.

The production of light is always accompanied by the emission of electrons yet Faraday's induction effect is not an ionization effect which contradicts Maxwell's EM theory of light. Einstein transforms Maxwell's equations to justify Maxwell's theory (Einstein, § 6) but altering the coordinate system of Maxwell's equations does not change the fact Maxwell's theory is based on Faraday's induction effect that is not luminous which is experimental proof Maxwell's electromagnetic field cannot be used to represent Einstein's electromagnetic ether (Einstein*, § 1).


.


Einstein, Albert. On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies. Annalen der Physik. 17:891-921. 1905.

.

Einstein*, Albert. The Principle of Relativity and its Consequences in Modern Physics. 1910.

.

Maxwell, James. Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field. Royal Society Transactions. Vol. CLV. 1864.

.

.

.

.

Lada Sartakova

.

.

-----------------------------------------------

.

.

Revision as of 17:46, 22 May 2015

Welcome to this sandbox page, a space to experiment with editing.

You can either edit the source code ("Edit source" tab above) or use VisualEditor ("Edit" tab above). Click the "Publish changes" button when finished. You can click "Show preview" to see a preview of your edits, or "Show changes" to see what you have changed.

Anyone can edit this page and it is automatically cleared regularly (anything you write will not remain indefinitely). Click here to reset the sandbox.

You can access your personal sandbox by clicking here, or using the "Sandbox" link in the top right.Creating an account gives you access to a personal sandbox, among other benefits.

Do NOT, under any circumstances, place promotional, copyrighted, offensive, or libelous content in sandbox pages. Repeatedly doing so WILL get you blocked from editing.

For more info about sandboxes, see Misplaced Pages:About the sandbox and Help:My sandbox. New to Misplaced Pages? See the contributing to Misplaced Pages page or our tutorial. Questions? Try the Teahouse!


Sandbox navigation
Information
Misplaced Pages sandboxes
Template sandboxes
Draft sandboxes
User sandboxes
Module sandboxes
File sandboxes
My sandboxes
Test wikis
Shortcuts




33x

.



Optica!

Ben T. Ito

April 22, 2015

.

This paper will analyze the wave theory of light.

.

1. Introduction.

.

The wave theory of light is based on light waves formed by the motion of an optical ether, composed of matter, yet light propagates in vacuum that is void of matter which contradicts the wave theory of light. Michelson tests for Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter, but the result was negative. Lorentz reverses the negative result of Michelson's experiment to justify the ether but light propagating in vacuum is definitive and irreversible experimental proof the optical ether, composed of matter, does not exist. Maxwell EM theory is introduced since induction forms in vacuum but Faraday's induction effect is not luminous. Poynting supports Maxwell's theory by deriving an EM energy equation of light but Poynting's current wire is also not luminous. Hertz structurally unites light with induction but Hertz's spark gap emits electrons. The production of light is always accompanied by the emission of electrons yet induction is not an ionization effect which contradicts Maxwell's induction analogy.

.

.


.

.

2. Maxwell

.

.

In Maxwell's paper, "Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field" (1864), Maxwell's describes an electromagnetic theory of light based on Faraday induction effect.

"If, therefore, the phenomena described by Faraday in the Ninth Series of his Experimental Researches were the only known facts about electric currents, the laws of Ampere relating to the attraction of conductors carrying currents as well as those of Faraday about the mutual induction of currents, might be deduced by mechanical reasoning." (Maxwell, part II).

.

"ELECTROMAGNETIC THEORY OF LIGHT" (Maxwell, Part VI).

.


Maxwell's theory is based on Faraday's induction effect that is not luminous. Hertz's attempts to structurally unite light with induction but Hertz's spark gap emits electrons. Planck uses the blackbody radiation effect to support Maxwell's theory but the blackbody also emits electrons yet induction is not an ionization effect. Furthermore, Maxwell's external electric field conflicts with Faraday's induction effect that only represents an external magnetic field.

.

.


.

.


3. Conclusion

.

.

The production of light is always accompanied by the emission of electrons yet Faraday's induction effect is not an ionization effect which contradicts Maxwell's EM theory of light. Einstein transforms Maxwell's equations to justify Maxwell's theory (Einstein, § 6) but altering the coordinate system of Maxwell's equations does not change the fact Maxwell's theory is based on Faraday's induction effect that is not luminous which is experimental proof Maxwell's electromagnetic field cannot be used to represent Einstein's electromagnetic ether (Einstein*, § 1).


.


Einstein, Albert. On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies. Annalen der Physik. 17:891-921. 1905.

.

Einstein*, Albert. The Principle of Relativity and its Consequences in Modern Physics. 1910.

.

Maxwell, James. Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field. Royal Society Transactions. Vol. CLV. 1864.

.

.

.

.

Lada Sartakova

.

.


.

.

Category: