| Revision as of 15:13, 21 May 2015 editOhnoitsjamie (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators260,862 edits del← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:43, 23 May 2015 edit undoGene93k (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers468,027 edits Listing at WP:DELSORT under Science (FWDS)Next edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| *'''Only delete or redirect''' (assuming not notable) if ] rewrites ] to include a collapsible box with all the data content in every asteroid article they are sending to AfD, which number in the hundreds. If this is not done, I vote that ] be deleted from Misplaced Pages. Please opine whether you agree that ] should be deleted from Misplaced Pages.--''']''' • <small><sup style="position:relative">]<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-3.2ex;*left:-5.5ex;">]</span></sup></small> 16:38, 20 May 2015 (UTC) | *'''Only delete or redirect''' (assuming not notable) if ] rewrites ] to include a collapsible box with all the data content in every asteroid article they are sending to AfD, which number in the hundreds. If this is not done, I vote that ] be deleted from Misplaced Pages. Please opine whether you agree that ] should be deleted from Misplaced Pages.--''']''' • <small><sup style="position:relative">]<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-3.2ex;*left:-5.5ex;">]</span></sup></small> 16:38, 20 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete'' and redirect per ]. Don't see how a one-sentence article is useful in any way. <b>] ]</b> 15:13, 21 May 2015 (UTC) | *'''Delete'' and redirect per ]. Don't see how a one-sentence article is useful in any way. <b>] ]</b> 15:13, 21 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 13:43, 23 May 2015 (UTC)</small> | |||
Revision as of 13:43, 23 May 2015
1482 Sebastiana
- 1482 Sebastiana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. I think it should be deleted; or (per NASTRO) redirected to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn (talk) 12:09, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect title to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. The subject fails WP:NASTCRIT and WP:GNG.- MrX 15:00, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- Only delete or redirect (assuming not notable) if Boleyn rewrites List of minor planets: 1001–2000 to include a collapsible box with all the data content in every asteroid article they are sending to AfD, which number in the hundreds. If this is not done, I vote that Boleyn be deleted from Misplaced Pages. Please opine whether you agree that Boleyn should be deleted from Misplaced Pages.--Milowent • 16:38, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- 'Delete and redirect per WP:NASTRO. Don't see how a one-sentence article is useful in any way. OhNoitsJamie 15:13, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:43, 23 May 2015 (UTC)