Revision as of 16:38, 28 July 2006 editPiotrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers285,696 edits →I would like to stop useless personal attacks against me.← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:42, 28 July 2006 edit undo83.5.247.158 (talk) →I would like to stop useless personal attacks against me.Next edit → | ||
Line 839: | Line 839: | ||
:: '''I''' suggest you create an account and stop harassing everyone. And incidentally, Piotrus advised you to create an account to... :) -- ] <sup>]</sup> 16:24, 28 July 2006 (UTC) | :: '''I''' suggest you create an account and stop harassing everyone. And incidentally, Piotrus advised you to create an account to... :) -- ] <sup>]</sup> 16:24, 28 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
:::I replied on your talk page, Im sure you will understand that it is Ghirlandajo who needs to review his behaviour. Full (reconciliatory) reply there. ] 16:42, 28 July 2006 (UTC) PS Forgive me Piotrus, I have been labelled a troll by some, which might be used against you, just wanted to let you know that you shouldnt cave in under the pressure of the unjust comments of a few. ] 16:42, 28 July 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:42, 28 July 2006
File:WikipediaSignpost icon.png You have the right to stay informed. Exercise it by reading the Misplaced Pages Signpost today. |
Please add new comments in new sections if you are addressing a new issue. Thanks in advance. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus |
---|
Talk archives: Archive 1 (moved Jan 17, 2005), Archive 2 (moved Feb 21, 2005), Archive 3 (moved May 19, 2005), Archive 4 (moved July 14, 2005), Archive 5 (moved September 27, 2005), Archive 6 (moved November 23, 2005), Archive 7 (moved January 7, 2006), Archive 8 (moved 19 March, 2006), Archive 9 (moved 6 May, 2006), Archive 10 (moved 17 June, 2006)
If you have come here to place a request for a re-confirmation of my adminship, please note that, at my discretion, I will either:
The rest of this page fills out particulars and commits to certain processes in advance so as to reduce ambiguity or the possible perception that I will change the rules as I go along to get the desired outcome. Note: This page has a talk page because I value input and feedback on this whole thing. There's some lively discussion there already, and you, gentle reader, are invited to comment as well. The Recall Petition processThe petition shall operate as follows:
The modified RfC process (choice 1)This is one of the three possible "next steps" after a certified recall. The modified RfC will be constituted as follows:
The RfAr process (choice 2)This is one of the three possible "next steps" after a certified recall. The RfAr will be initiated as follows:
Resignation (choice 3)This is one of the three possible "next steps" after a certified recall. The resignation shall be constituted as "under a cloud" meaning that a re RfA has standard success criteria as then constituted by the community and that withdrawing midway through is not an option for regaining admin status. Only a successful RfA will suffice. I may choose to stand again for RfA immediately, at some later date of my own choosing, or never, as I deem appropriate. Grace periodAny change in any provision of this that makes it more stringent to qualify a petition or participate in any other part of the process, or more likely to lead to an outcome more favourable to me shall have a 2 week "grace period" during which any recall initiated will be under the old terms. Any change that is of the opposite sense (easier to qualify/participate, less favourable to me) shall go into effect immediately. No Double JeopardyOnce this process concludes for matters raised by petitioners during an instance of this process, I will not honor a second recall request regarding the same matters. If however new matters arise, the community is welcome to initiate another recall. No vexatious litigantsNo petitioner may initiate or support a petition for my recall more than three times in any 365 day period. This does not apply to participation in a modified RfC. SeverabilityThis is about my commitment to the community to be accountable, not about a category membership. Thus, the provisions of this page shall survive if, for example, the CAT:AOTR (or successor, whatever named) is deleted, renamed, listified. etc., and under any other reasonable circumstances. Only my explicitly stated withdrawal from this commitment itself will suffice. No withdrawalI do not intend to withdraw but that's an intent, not a promise. However, I promise not to withdraw to escape the consequences of this commitment. The only time I will withdraw from this category is if no recall is currently underway. This is subject to the same 2 week grace period as the eligibility or any other changes, so any withdrawal has at least 2 weeks to go into effect. Notes
Casimirus the Great (East Europe)Na angielskojęzycznej wikipedii jesteśmy tak nieliczni że upieranie się przy Polskim nazewnictwie monarchów (nawet jeżeli one poprawne) to trochę jak zawracanie biegu rzeki za pomoca kija :/ Mieciu K 16:14, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
My RfA
Thank youThank you for removing your comment about the "Polish cabal". That's a term that I continue to find personally offensive, and I wish everyone would stop using it. It meant a lot to me to see that you reconsidered the wisdom of using it on the talk page. :) --Elonka 18:46, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Katowice i... nasza metropoliaWłaśnie moim celem na en.Wikipedii jest jak najlepsze i obszerniejsze opisanie Katowic oraz GZM-u. Postaram się co jakiś czas przetłumaczyć i rozszerzyć artykuły o naszym mieście i całym obszarze miejskim w miarę moich sił i czasu. Pozdrawiam :) LUCPOL 23:40, 13 June 2006 (UTC) Your article, Aleksander Krzyżanowski, was selected for DYK!
Thanks for your contributions! ++Lar: t/c 02:15, 14 June 2006 (UTC) Oh My Goddess!I am having difficulty locating source for the "cultural impact" of the serries. Any ideas where to look (preferably professional reviews)? --Cat out 14:29, 14 June 2006 (UTC) Thank youI humbly accept the award. Thank you! Páll 17:13, 15 June 2006 (UTC) I thank you very much for your award as well! Much apprecated. Keep making and finding those great articles! ++Lar: t/c 17:52, 15 June 2006 (UTC) Thanks Piotrus, I am honoured --Cactus.man ✍ 18:42, 15 June 2006 (UTC) Thanks!A big pixelated WikiThanks for the Barnstar! Now, please, can you suggest a more interesting nomination? :) — BRIAN0918 • 2006-06-16 02:23
WikibreakCould you do me a fovour and block my user account for two weeks or more? I am currently writing my master's degree and I need a wikibreak. Regards 15:00, 16 June 2006 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mieciu K (talk • contribs) 11:00, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Henryk Wolinski.jpgThanks for uploading Image:Henryk Wolinski.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Misplaced Pages articles constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 00:09, 17 June 2006 (UTC) ThanksFor the gift :) --Molobo 00:40, 17 June 2006 (UTC) About a licenseDear Piotr, I tried to fix the “Image:Jan Kochanowski.jpg” license but I am not sure if I did it well. Please, do you can check it? Thank you. Gustavo Szwedowski de Korwin 09:49, 17 June 2006 (UTC) DYK
“Image:Jan Kochanowski.jpg” 2nd.That can be the mistake, since the source was en:wiki itself. Gustavo Szwedowski de Korwin 05:37, 18 June 2006 (UTC) Your article, Henryk Woliński, was selected for DYK!
Thanks for your contributions! ++Lar: t/c 19:28, 18 June 2006 (UTC) Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Italian War of 1521I've responded to your comment; if you could perhaps clarify the nature of the map you're looking for and whether the one I have available would be acceptable to you, I'd really appreciate it. Thanks! Kirill Lokshin 06:33, 19 June 2006 (UTC) "Democratic"Piotrus, please, why do you have to push this into PSW? This is totally hypothetical. It was likely to be a democracy in a sense that there would have been elections and stuff rather than the monarchy. It still could or could not become a dictatorship, as Poland became later. Also democratic country and "democracy" are two very different things. The latter is possibly true (elections and voting, we don't know how open and fair though). The former (democratic), is a hypothesis, and a highly questionable one. Poland's minorities didn't see it "democratic" and we have no idea on how democratic a mega-state would have been. There is no doubt that it would have been Polish lead, while Polish-dominated would have been more exact IMO (still I am not pushing it). --Irpen 20:16, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:WikiProject AwarenessYou may like to show your involvment in this project with a userbox I've created and saved into my userspace for now. It's likely to change (and indeed you are most welcome to try and improve it), so it's probably best not to subst it for now. The code you need is {{User:Xyrael/Templates/User WikiProject Awareness}}; thanks for your continued interest in this project. --Xyrael 21:25, 19 June 2006 (UTC) DYK
— BRIAN0918 • 2006-06-20 15:58 InterwikiMyślałem, że robot (np. Yurikbot) to zrobi. Appleseed (Talk) 18:41, 20 June 2006 (UTC) Polish Questionre: Category:Polish social activists to Category:Polish activists (Cfd, your nom.) Didn't quite follow why there isn't a distiction between social and political types of activists on this one. Drop me an email. Thanks. // FrankB 23:23, 20 June 2006 (UTC) DYK
da Vinci BarnstarCheck this out, da Vinci Barnstar. --evrik 15:49, 22 June 2006 (UTC) Major overhaulI just moved your text to Misplaced Pages:Barnstar and award proposals/major overhaul. --evrik 19:05, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Co do AustriiPolak był premierem Austro-Węgier w latach 1895-1897, zobacz Kazimierz Badeni --Molobo 22:05, 22 June 2006 (UTC) Taka mała ciekawostkaPrzypomniało mi się w związku z pewnym artykułem Dzieło Rosjan. Myślisz że dodać do jakiegoś artykułu ? --Molobo 00:02, 23 June 2006 (UTC) DYK
Austria treated Poles with tactThe footnote is a good reference here, it says that Russia and Austria treated Poles with hostility but after 1867 Austria treated Poles well, and this alliance with Russia ended. --Molobo 11:09, 23 June 2006 (UTC) About See alsoYou once said in the Talk:Transhumanism page that according to a Misplaced Pages rule of thumb: 1) if something is in See also, try to incorporate it into the main body of the article 2) if something is in the main body, it should not be in See also and therefore 3) good articles have no See also sections. I was wondering if there was any kind of stated policy to the effect? --Loremaster 14:46, 23 June 2006 (UTC) Polsko-Bolszewicka wojnaPrzy okazji przejrzałem jeden z artykułów cytowanych przez Irpena na babelfish i znalazłem kilka ciekawych fragmentów: But Lenin, who strove for peaceful respite by any price for regrouping of forces before the new stage of world revolution, proposed to Poles "mini- Brest" - in addition to those earth, which they after all obtained, the even present Khmel'nitskiy, Minsk and the part of the Zhitomir of regions. the Polish camp panic ruled. Many ran away from Warsaw to the West, Seym attempted to agree with the Bolsheviks about the peace or the armistice on any conditions. But now already in Moscow they did not want peace. To z artykułu gdzie jest przytaczany przez Irpena fragment o paradzie w Kijowie. Warto dodać te fragmenty do artykułu o wojnie Polsko-Bolszewickiej --Molobo 16:30, 23 June 2006 (UTC) Wikisource accountI just noticed the question on you WS user page. When the the great language split occured developer movesd article to the new subdomains the preserve their history. So your old account stil exists at oldwikisource:User:Piotrus, but when you signed up for a new account at the en.WS subdomain all your contributions where automagically reattributed to you and it seem as if your account had been deleted when it had actually never existed there.--Birgitte§β ʈ Talk 18:42, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Just because
Category:Street Names ListYou may not have been aware that we already have Category:Streets and squares by city. This category is effectively a duplicate and what is the point of having a separate category with the word "names" in the title? I see little value in this category, and the fact that it has started with two cities in Eastern Europe at this late stage shows that it is eccentric. Streets can be also categorised by country within Category:Roads by country. That system is well established too. I have proposed a merger and would ask you to consider that option. Chicheley 23:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC) Edit warringYou reverted twice in under two hours today, here, adding fuel to the fire of what's becoming another nasty edit war over there. I've blocked Sciurinæ and Molobo for warring tonight, perhaps I'll go warn Ghirla and Irpen for their part in the warring also, but of all people, can you, as an admin, always refrain from this edit warring. Of all people, you know that partisan rancor rules the world of dozens of Polish and German related articles. At the first sign of a conflict, why not use WP:DR (it's what it's there for) and try mediation or file an RFC. When those don't work, go to arbitration. God knows we don't need any more of this edit warring. Dmcdevit·t 06:36, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
SoltykHi Piotrus, the image was uploaded under the correct name from commons. However, it was deleted from commons by Essjay. I will not be able to undo the image deletion as I'm not an admin on Commons. Logically, since I c-uploaded, it shd be available on WP as well - however, I'm not sure if image undeletion can be done with retrospective effect. My guess is that it cannot be. let me check. Meanwhile I have found another replacement from Commons and put it in the article. It'd be great if you can let me know if this is the same/similar image. Else, you may want to take it directly with Essjay. --Gurubrahma 18:13, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
SlanderPiotrus, in several pages that I monitor, I see that you have been tossing the word "slander" around quite often. I realize that English is not your first language, but, as I have advised you before, I would remind you that the term is considered uncivil. To quote from the Misplaced Pages:Civility policy page, it contributes to an uncivil environment by "calling someone a liar, or accusing him/her of slander or libel. Even if true, such remarks tend to aggravate rather than resolve a dispute. I strongly recommend that you stop using the term in the future, and I would also urge you to review some of your recent comments to remove the term and anything else that might be regarded as uncivil or as a personal attack. --Elonka 18:56, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Ghirlandajo and MoloboPlease stop comparing Ghirlandajo to Molobo. Unlike Molobo, Ghirlandajo has contributed many, many good articles and helped a lot with DYK work. As you are usually great in assuming good faith where others have given up, please assume good faith with Ghirlandajo again and return to editing in a constructive and collaborative instead of combative way (I have asked the same of Ghirlandajo). Thank you, and happy editing, Kusma (討論) 19:05, 24 June 2006 (UTC) Yet another DYK!
Thanks again! -- Samir धर्म 09:06, 25 June 2006 (UTC) SpellingHi, I read the article on Constitution of People's Republic of Poland. I thought I might notify you that it is "amendment" not ammendment. Besides, you seem to miss commas in some places. Anyway, the article was quite good.--Wai Hong 10:00, 25 June 2006 (UTC) PIOTRUS BLASS (Piotr Blass)JESTEM PIONIEREM SIECI W USA KOLEGA MICHNIKA I KANDYDATEM NA GUBERNATORA FLORYDY W ROKU 2006 PIOTRUS BLASS Z WARSZAWY WYGNANY W ROKU 1968 WWW.PBLASS.COM MOZE NAPISZ O MNIE ARTYKUL I PROPNUJE WSPOLPRACE ADRES NA MOJEJ STRONIE CZESC PIOTREK WWW.PBLASS.COM DYK
Your article, His Master's Voice (novel), was selected for DYK!
Thanks for your contributions! ++Lar: t/c 12:03, 27 June 2006 (UTC) tag-taggingHello there. Could you take a look at {{POV-tag}}? Is it me or is tagging tagged tags is not the best way to deal with POV disputes? To me it seems like an attempt to make the whole POV tag obsolete. After all there's always someone who supports certain POV and someone who calls for its NPOVing... //Halibutt 12:05, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Poetry FACHi - I'd appreciate a revisit to Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Poetry; changes were made in response to your comment and additional input is solicited. In particular, we've tried to make this article non-Western centric without creating a single section devoted to "other" poetries, but by spreading discussion throughout the article. Thanks, Sam 22:26, 27 June 2006 (UTC) Stanisław LemPerhaps creating a category would be a better idea? Appleseed (Talk) 23:25, 27 June 2006 (UTC) Your article nomination on DYK
Lithuanian resistanceHi, regarding your request at User talk:Legionas#Lithuanian resistance, I've started a page in my userspace called User:Heqs/Lithuanian resistance during World War II. Help and feedback welcome. heqs 19:56, 29 June 2006 (UTC) Commons image problemsPlease take a look at this and this ? On Commons:Deletion requests you're mentioned as an expert. Thanks in advance, NielsFTalk to me.. 15:24, 30 June 2006 (UTC) (also commons:User:NielsF, I'm there more often than here) Comparative methodHi! Thanks for your feedback on the Comparative method FAC. We've done our best to try to meet your objections - though finding more external links has proved rather problematic - but please do take a look and let us know what you think: any suggestions on how to further improve the article are, of course, more than welcome. Cheers, sjcollier 21:31, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Updating DYKA while back you had asked about additional updaters. I've noticed that we're having less updating lately and additional updaters would be very useful. I commented here WPT:DYK#Additional_DYK_updaters about the process. If you're interested I think it would be great if you tried your hand at it. I would be happy to help in any way I could. ++Lar: t/c 12:32, 1 July 2006 (UTC) Your DYK nomination for Michał Boym was successful
Thanks for your contributions! ++Lar: t/c 15:36, 2 July 2006 (UTC) Thanks!
PIOTREK BLASSPIOTRUS STAY IN TOUCH MY WEBMASTERS PBLASS.COM I PIOTRBLASS.COM ZACZYNAJA TWORZYC CORAZ LEPSZA STRONE PRZYPOMNIJ MI JAK POMOC TOBIE W STWORZENIU STRONY PIOTR BLASS W WIKIPEDII CZESC PIOTREK BLASS NitpickingYes, you are nitpicking. :) Ultimately, as I'm sure you can sympathize with, I'm trying to untangle links on several hundred pages, and I'm using my best judgment on whether to pipe/redirect/disambiguate as I go through, though some of the edit summaries may not be 100% perfect. Feel free to help, by the way. I'm working backwards from Sigismund III, so you can work on Sigismund I and we won't conflict. --Elonka 23:26, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Re: Military history WikiProject templatesYes, just adding the template to the talk page is all that's needed. I'll make a note of this in the FAQ, per your suggestion. Thanks! Kirill Lokshin 18:33, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Postacie historii PolskiWidziałam Twój głos w dyskusji na temat tej kategorii, dlatego postanowiłam skonsultować z Tobą moje wątpliwości. Mnie też się nie podoba nazwa tej kategorii. A co sądzisz o: Cudzoziemcy w historii Polski lub Obcokrajowcy w historii Polski. Przy czym w opisie kategorii należałoby określić, że chodzi tylko o tych cudzoziemców, którzy byli związani z Polską w jakiś szczególny sposób (no właśnie, w jaki? to jeszcze kwestia do przemyślenia, ale na początek zmiana nazwy kategorii to już coś). Ludmiła Pilecka 22:44, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Entente in Piłsudski articleWhile I was spidering the Józef Pilsudski article for disambiguation links I noticed several instances of a wikilink to the Entente article. However, there existed several Ententes and because this article dealt with Poland (and in one instance the Triple Entente didn't exist after World War I because of the Russian Civil War) I was even confused further. So could you please specify what Entente you were referring to? I went ahead and noted one and bypassed disambig on some but I want to make sure. Thank you. Aaрон Кинни (t) 00:01, 5 July 2006 (UTC) User:Ingoolemo/Threads/06/07/05a DYK
Mediation
DYK
HelloPiotrus -- thanks for connecting with me. I hope you found my contributions interesting --Mayuresh 22:25, 5 July 2006 (UTC) DYK
Teika refsBack in a peer review for Fujiwara no Teika, one of your points was that it had insufficient referencing. Is it up to your standards now? --maru (talk) contribs 03:30, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Peace offeringI am aware of the articles. Were you planning on including them in your translation sweep? --Elonka 22:22, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
FBII have worked on the article. Please check it out. :) --Shane 02:38, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Help:Minor editOk thanks for the clarification. Until today I considered almost all my edits minor. Mieciu K 13:01, 7 July 2006 (UTC) RybenkoDunno, my Polish is non-existant, so I will leave it for someone else to debate. P.S. thanks re userpage and I think I will see you at Wikimania ;) Renata 13:26, 8 July 2006 (UTC) User:Ingoolemo/Threads/06/07/06a Józef Kossakowski (bishop)
About two different Image:Jan Kochanowski.jpgDear Piotr: A couple of days ago I noticed some trouble with the Image of the Jan Kochanowski page. In the pl.wiki there are two Jan Kochanowskis, one from the XVII century and other from now a day. Somebody uploaded a photo from this second Jan, a modern politician, in commons:wiki just as Image:Jan Kochanowski.jpg. So his image and not the Great Poet’s one was charged in fr:wiki by mistake. I tried to fix the problem naming one image as Image:Jan Kochanowski poet.jpg and the other as Image:Jan Kochanowski politician.jpg. This worked very well in pl:wiki (where I did even a disambiguation), commons:wiki and fr:wiki. Nevertheless a notice appeared yesterday saying that in wikipedia there is not a Image:Jan Kochanowski poet.jpg. I quote: “Misplaced Pages does not have an image with this exact name. Please do not manually create this page. If you wish to upload an image called Jan Kochanowski poet.jpg, see Misplaced Pages:Uploading images for instructions.” http://pl.wikipedia.org/Jan_Kochanowski http://pl.wikipedia.org/Jan_Kochanowski_%28poeta%29 http://pl.wikipedia.org/Jan_Kochanowski_%28polityk%29 http://en.wikipedia.org/Jan_Kochanowski http://fr.wikipedia.org/Jan_Kochanowski Please help me if you can. Best regards. --Gustavo Szwedowski de Korwin 20:00, 9 July 2006 (UTC) See you signed on WP:WFsSee: See also: WPP:Books and WPP:Novels
<ref>-2006-07-10T08:39:00.000Z">That DYK nomination looks better now. Could you please try using the ref-element (http://meta.wikimedia.org/Cite/Cite.php) so you can put links in a separate section on the bottom of the article and/or reference things multiple times with one link. I think that would make the article just that important little bit better. - Mgm| 08:39, 10 July 2006 (UTC)"> "> History of SolidarityHi Piotrus. I finished the reference change on History of Solidarity - I think it was a good idea to split it out of Solidarity. You've put a lot of work into this (it shows :). Cheers.--Bookandcoffee 17:04, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Social science fictionHello, Piotr! I've passed the exams, and now I'm on vacations (it's a long story, e.g. I failed Quantum Mechanics twice, but ultimately got Good for it). I've done some changes on Social science fiction article and expanded it -- but the text is probably somehow raw (especially Post-Soviet section). Could you have a look on it, please, if you have time? ellol 00:22, 11 July 2006 (UTC) Grodno Sejm DYK
Worek Plan on DYK
Wikimania biographyHi Piotrus. Is there any chance you could write a quick paragraph of biography for youself for the Wikimania Proceedings, rather than redirecting people to your Misplaced Pages userpage? Thanks. --ⁿɡ͡b Nick Boalch\ 12:23, 11 July 2006 (UTC) Piotr on DYK
Honorverse Wiki-ProjectHi Piotrus, this is Kathie from the Bar. Since both of us are frequent contributers to the Honorverse articles on Misplaced Pages, why don't we head up a project to improve and expand the Honorverse articles found on Misplaced Pages. --*Kat* 22:40, 11 July 2006 (UTC) ResignationThe reason why I appear to be a neutral editor is because I wanted to avoid the argument in general because I did not have the time to throw this and that back and forth due to school. However, I have held for a while the opinion that your behaviour as an administrator in the matters of the Polish sovereigns was not appropriate. I feel that you made attempts to obstruct the flow of Misplaced Pages because you allowed a bias to get the best of you. I am not one to make comparisons, however, I go with a lot of things on Misplaced Pages that I do not agree with and I am heavily involved in the renaming of articles. I'm sure you are an all-around fine Wikipedian (I am certain of that), but the renaming of those articles was not your shining moment. Fine Wikipedians may become administrator, however, that position puts one on eggshells. You crushed a few of them. Charles 03:51, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Norbert UbychaMógłbyś usunąć albo dać na AfD biogram tego niby sławnego piłkarza?? (zrobiłbym to sam, jednak chociaż rozumiem trochę angielski boję się go używać w miejscu takim jak to).PozdrawiamWtg87 13:04,12 July 2006 (UTC) PS.Wiem że jesteś inkluzjonistą ale chciałbym wiedzieć co tym sądzisz bo jak dla mnie to przykład samouwielbienia. Battle stub proposalsHi Piotrus I'm taking the liberty of fixing the category names for the battle stub templates you've proposed. Both stub templates and category names follow a strict naming convention e.g. {{Poland-battle-stub}} but Category:Polish battle stubs (as you can see, the categories don't use hyphens and we use adjectives for those but the templates use the proper name of the country.) It is a minor matter, and I hope you don't mind me fixing this, however it is required under WP:WSS rules. I believe one of our stub sorters (User:Alai) is still monitoring the Category:Battle stubs for potential new templates. WP:WSS normally creates new stub templates whenever an appropriate "group" of stubs (e.g. German battles) reach 60 or more. With the proper fixing of the category names, any of your proposed templates look like good candidates and any of them which can be applied to 60 already existing articles is almost 100% certain to be approved. Regards. Valentinian 18:55, 12 July 2006 (UTC) Outsider (comic) FlamarandeI noticed that you improved the article Outsider (comic), well it seems to have been nominated for deletion. Please feel free to vote according to your own opinion at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Outsider (comic) (2nd nomination). Thanks Flamarande 19:20, 12 July 2006 (UTC) Battle of Węgierska GórkaOn ], Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Example, which you recently nominated. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Error: Invalid time.&end=Error: Invalid time.&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Example Example), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. - Mgm| 09:07, 13 July 2006 (UTC)Re: General User SurveyHi Piotrus, the survey hasn't been touched for months (apart from your recent comments, for which thanks, and which I intended to respond to but haven't yet). However, if you have the energy yourself to take it forward, please do so. I know that Erik Zachte wanted to write a script (I think in Perl) so that the survey could be translated into many languages, and then delivered and fed back in a form that could be decipherable (to the researchers) without needing to translate each questionnaire. Again, if you were competent in helping with this, or think you know someone who could be, that would be very much appreciated. The sad fact of this survey, though, is that I talked with Erik about it at the last Wikimania, and there still isn't anything to show by the Wikimania coming up (which I'll be at, and I believe you will too - hopefully see you there). I'm a bit tied up with other things these days, but if you want to put some spark into the survey, you're very welcome to do so. Cheers. Cormaggio 09:56, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
DYK
Stanisław KoskoWitaj - szukając materiałów na temat kapitana żeglugi wielkiej Stanisława Kosko zobaczyłem, że google wyrzuciło mi stronę Twojego brudnopisu. Czy posiadasz jakieś jego materiały biograficzne, które możnaby było opublikować na polskiej Wiki w kategorii Oficerowie żeglugi? Może sam byłbyś zainteresowany napisaniem stosownego artykułu? Pozdrowienia Wiki:pl MaciejKa - 13:06, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Re: Article Contribution CounterHere is the query you wanted to construct. ACC currently does support namespaces; however, because it is used on 100+ projects it uses the 'Project' namespace, rather than 'Misplaced Pages'. TDS | talk 15:04, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Thank youI'm sort of back, though probably not without time restraints.--SylwiaS | talk 15:44, 18 July 2006 (UTC) DYK
Misplaced Pages:MtGTo be perfectly honest, the reason I didn't link em all together was fear of having them all deleted at once :) You can see all six on the subpage of my image gallery (User:GeeJo/Gallery/MTG) or just follow these links:
I'd originally set out to make a hefty set, but figured it'd be a bad idea to upload that many non-encyclopedic images to either Misplaced Pages or Commons, and it'd lose a lot of the impact if I had to display them as external links. So I settled for creating one of each colour. I'm glad you enjoyed 'em :) GeeJo ⁄(c) • 21:26, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Polish-Soviet WarHi Piotrus, While reading through the article, I saw that there are {{fact}} templates in some places in the article, which presumably were not there when the article was promoted. Maybe you or someone of your colleagues knowledgable in this subject could reexamine it? It would be a pity to lose another MILHIST FA, with all these reviews going on already... -- Grafikm 22:10, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Question about locator dots on mapsHi - Have you noticed the question I posted at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Maps#Locator dots? I'd really like to hear from some of the map "regulars" about this. And if you have any ideas for other ways I might solicit responses, please let me know. Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) 03:55, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Re: Great sigJust letting you know that I am impressed by your sig design and I will likely update minde to this, the design and effect are really impressive :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 05:26, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
I was thinking about something like Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus. But it's late and I will think more in the morning, I would like to achieve contrast similar to yours.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 06:31, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
User:Misza13's pile!
DYK
Image:Teutonic order charge.jpg listed for deletionAn image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Teutonic order charge.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT 05:16, 23 July 2006 (UTC)CFR updatePer your suggestion, I updated the request at Misplaced Pages:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 July 14#Category:Warmia-Masuria to Category:Warmian-Masurian Voivodship. Could you please pop in to confirm the change? Also, your participation is requested at Misplaced Pages:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 July 16#Category:Voivodships of Poland to Category:Voivodeships of Poland. Thanks, --Elonka 07:39, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Another DYK!
Thanks for the great nomination -- Samir धर्म 18:38, 23 July 2006 (UTC) DYK
BTW, sorry about the screwups with the Polski Fiat nom. Cheers -- Samir धर्म 13:19, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Re: Misplaced Pages MTG setI only created the first card and I wasn't aware that there were more. :) If you can collect them all together, you should categorize them or link to them all from one page. That would be neat. On a releated note, one of the cards you linked me, Image:COTW MTG Card.png, may be in danger of deletion. It looks like it uses scanned artwork from a Magic card, I don't think this will be covered by fair-use. --JiFish(/Contrib) 12:14, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Social promotion - more odditiesThis article has been nominated again as a featured article. I'm sending you a note because you were involved in moves of the prior nomination notice. Ignoring the usefulness/validity of the nomination, there seems to be a problem with commenting on the renomination. Could you help (or notify someone who can help)? Notice that if you click on "edit" for the Social Promotion article, the editing screen shows NO prior text. If you click on the name of another nominated article, by contrast, you see all the text in the section. And, judging by my experience, when you do add a comment, it gets put into an archive page. (And, perhaps strangely, not recorded on the "User contributions" log.) Thanks in advance. John Broughton 15:12, 25 July 2006 (UTC) P.S. Looking at the log of the nominating user for what he/she did on July 25th might be useful. P.P.S. The log appears to show the archiving the comments of two people who object to the nomination. I'm not sure that has to do with the edit problem (above), but it seems noteworthy. Talk:Tsar and Congress PolandHello Piotrus, I wanted some advice from a Polish user relating to a dispute we've been having at Talk:Tsar. Basically, we've been arguing about whether Russian and Bulgarian usage of "Tsar" is to be seen as equivalent to "Emperor" or not, and also whether it can be seen as equivalent to "King." One thing I noticed was that Alexander I, after the Congress of Vienna, took the title of "Tsar of Poland," even though the state created at the Congress was the "Kingdom of Poland." I was wondering if the Polish usage could provide any help with understanding what the situation was with this. Am I correct in assuming that in Polish, "King of Poland" and not "Tsar of Poland" was used? Thanks. john k 17:10, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Maly problemWitam tutaj Tymek 18:16, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Pracuje wlasnie nad artykulem o pilce noznej w Polsce w latach 1918-1939 I okazuje sie ze gdy chcialem dokleic kolejny rozdzial zostalem poinformowany ze artykul jest zbyt dlugi Nie spodziewalem sie tego i teraz nie wiem co zrobic bo szkoda przerywac w roku 1936 gdy pozostaly mi tylko 3 lata do opisania Co robic? oto wspomniany artykul http://en.wikipedia.org/Polish_soccer_%28football%29_in_interwar_period OSA AfDAfD'd per your suggestion. Please be more careful next time not to remove unrelated comments. Thanks.--SarekOfVulcan 00:34, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Rv editsAlso on my userpage. The vandalism that took place was legitimate for a revert, and I seem not to have noticed legitimate edits, due to some small changes made by the vandaliser! Thanks for the heads up, my apologies, as always, I Assume Good Faith and apologise. Best wishes. M0RHI 01:21, 26 July 2006 (UTC) RE: Table on Honorverse CharactersSorry about how complex the thing is. I used one of those HTML/Wiki converters, and yikes. Anyway, if you know of a better way to do tables, feel free to re-do it! --*Kat* 03:59, 26 July 2006 (UTC) HolesI agree that Ghirla's comment was a definite ethnic slur, and I would recommend taking it to ANI. --Elonka 17:17, 26 July 2006 (UTC) Jeszcze razWitam tu znow Tymek 17:23, 26 July 2006 (UTC) Pisac to ja moge - nie ma problemu ale problem jest w tym ze nie moge wiecej doklejac tekstu i nie wiem co z tym zrobic A co do zrodel to dodam jak juz skoncze artykul opisy obrazkow uznalem ze nie sa potrzebne to sam sa same herby klubow plus dwa plakaty olimpijskie pozdro Rzeczpospolita articleHello. From your comment to Rzeczpospolita article on Polish Portal: ...and seems to misunderstand the role of administrators (who according to article verify and approve articles). Perhaps the following passage from the Polish Wiki could be interesting to you Administratorzy w MediaWiki (oprogramowaniu, na bazie którego działa Misplaced Pages) w Ostatnich zmianach widzą, które z edycji nie zostały jeszcze zatwierdzone przez któregokolwiek z administratorów. Zapewnia to, że każda zmiana zostanie skontrolowana nie tylko przez wielu zwykłych użytkowników, ale również przynajmniej przez jednego administratora. I think it does suggest something you criticized. Surprisingly enough I can not find a similar statement neither in English, nor in French version. Maybe a good occasion to edit this article? --Beaumont 00:10, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Crash spaceUnfortunately as much as I would like to help, I will already be back home in NYC on that date! :( Páll 04:02, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Sociology Project News
Move by BalcerPlease tell me you don't support Balcer's latest action. This is the kinda thing which destroys trust on wikipedia. Surely this name doesn't mean so much to you that you'd condone such an action. Calgacus (ΚΑΛΓΑΚΟΣ) 16:42, 27 July 2006 (UTC) New barnstar proposalHi there! I see that you previously supported a barnstar proposal for stub sorting. There's a new one I'm trying to drum up support for. If you like, you can see it at The Stub Sorting Barnstar. Thanks for considering it. Cheers, ♥ Her Pegship♥ 17:42, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Your new green signatureYour new signature is more than three lines in my window without the datestamp, uses some shockingly obtrusive colors, uses smaller text than the standard, and has its own span class. Could you please use something a little lower-key? - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 18:20, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
For now I am changing to 6d, it is much less obtrusive but keeps colorful talk link which should be enough for my primary purpose of making the sig easy to spot. Tnx for the comments, and any further suggestions are appreciated. If you think 6d has still to much code, I guess I could lose the span and go with 6i.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus talk 19:03, 27 July 2006 (UTC) New signature (6d) test: -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 19:04, 27 July 2006 (UTC) That's still three lines of code, and it's still really small. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 19:15, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
If I remove the small tag (version 6l) my sig is only a half a line longer then yours, and safely withing the 'two or three lines' lenght requirement of WP:SIG:
-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 19:38, 27 July 2006 (UTC) HonestyPiotrus, I was very surprised to see the recent post of yours at AN/I , where you said, I am not currently involved with any content dispute with user Ghirlandajo, and so Irpen suggestion that I try to gain something by this block is a sad example of bad faith on the part of an otherwise reasonable contributor. Huh? You absolutely are involved in a dispute, and a major one, about the naming of the Jogaila article. How can you justify your statement? --Elonka 03:36, 28 July 2006 (UTC) I would like to stop useless personal attacks against me.Saying things like "as you both seem to think that WP:CIV is a useless policy. May I recommend AfD it first? If you suceed I promise never again to bring the issue of your incivility up." are blatant personal attacks, and I would rather prefer you avoiding them. If this was an attempt to try and make me using insults or things like that, well I'm not Ghirla and never use those. Admit, Piotrus, that the war between you and Ghirla is no longer a matter of content or opinions, as, like you said, you never edit the same pages. It is just a useless personal war. -- Grafikm 15:57, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
|