Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 06:47, 1 June 2015

Due to personal issues, Zackmann08 will be away from Misplaced Pages for an undefined period of time.

User	Talk	Awards	Sources	Contacts	Notes	Templates/Tools	Bookmarks	My Sandbox	v t e

Archives

Archive 1

Only warn if you revert, please follow levels

Diff
Two things, first follow the warning levels scheme, if it is an editor's first edit, it is extremly uncalled for to jump on with a 4im warning, that isn't WP:AGF. Second, I reverted and warned that user, there is no purpose in you trying to warn them again. Let the reverting editor give the warning, unless they have obviously forgotten. Thanks! EoRdE6 03:35, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

I see you have already noticed it, my bad. EoRdE6 03:35, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

@EoRdE6: My bad *hangs head*. I Can't stand vandals... Its one thing if it is accidental or something, but when obviously vandalize.... It just pisses me off. :-p But you are of course correct, that is not WP:AGF. Thanks for the message. I shall do better. --Zackmann08 (talk) 03:38, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Florence Fire/EMs

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Florence Fire/EMS Department. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards. If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Please review WP:UNSOURCED and WP:NOTASTATSBOOK before you simply revert appropriate edits. Mr305worldwide 20:13, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

@Mr305worldwide: for future reference, if you wish to place a warning on a users page (whether mine or someone else's), please make use of WP:TWINKLE. Simply copying and pasting a message I left you just looks terrible. There is no formatting, your signature is not properly time stamped (since you just replaced my username with your own) and none of those links work. I mean the purpose of the warning is to help address the issue and since none of the message links anywhere I have nowhere to go to try to resolve the issue. --Zackmann08 (talk) 21:06, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

@Zackmann08: for future reference, Florence Fire/EMS hasn't updated run stats for 2 years. Mr305worldwide (talk) 21:23, 19 May 2015 (UTC)Mr305worldwide

Zackmann08 would you be willing to peacefully end the war? Mr305worldwide (talk) 23:59, 19 May 2015 (UTC)User:Mr305worldwide(talk)

@Mr305worldwide: you continue to operate under the assumption that I am at war with you. If that is the mentality you wish to have then that is your right. My only desire was to have proper information on the page. The material you added to the page was not properly cited and you removed content that was cited. When you didn't get your way, you threw a temper-tantrum and blanked the page and even vandalized my constructive response to the attempt by a neutral 3rd party to protect the page, only stopping after multiple admins warned you. As far as I am concerned there never was a "war". I bare no ill will towards you, I simply don't care. Do as you wish, but vandalize the page again and I will simply revert your changes again, so I would advise you to find better ways to contribute to the Misplaced Pages community. Have a good evening. --Zackmann08 (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

June 2015

@John from Idegon: I get you already don't like me but that was NOT edit warring. Again this is a user with 4 edits who chose to revert my edit which clearly violates 3 separate Misplaced Pages policies. Again I am in the process of trying to redo all fire pages. Be honest, you simply reverted my edit because you don't like me not because you think the content belongs. --Zackmann08 (talk) 05:35, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

@John from Idegon: also, don't template the regulars. Come on man! You've been around here for years you should know this! If you think I am engaging in an edit war you don't need to put a big giant warning on my page. Just say something. --Zackmann08 (talk) 06:00, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

I reverted your edit because you are EDIT WARRING. That's why I templated you for EDIT WARRING. A few days ago, you boldly reverted a bunch of content from an article. That's just fine. Earlier today, an editor reverted your bold edit. Still fine. At that point, you should have gone to the talk page and started a discussion to form a consensus. Or retired from the fray. Those are your only two proper options at that point. Instead, you chose to remove the content again. THAT is what edit warring is. It is not my opinion, it is a fact.

As far as not templating the regulars, when you get to be one, hollar. If you were a regular, you'd know that most IP addresses are dynamic and change regularly. The fact that the IP only has a few edits is meaningless. If you were a regular, you'd know the difference between policies, guidelines and essays. If you were a regular, you'd know the difference between a PROD, a CSD and an XFD process. If you were a regular, you'd know that it is POLICY to assume good faith and wouldn't accuse me of acting in bad faith (for the second time now). I don't give a flying fuck about you, or the DFD. My only concern is the encyclopedia. You seriously need to get over yourself. John from Idegon (talk) 06:47, 1 June 2015 (UTC)