| Revision as of 03:32, 1 June 2015 editMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,134,948 edits →American politics 2 arbitration proposed decision posted: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:48, 1 June 2015 edit undoAstral Prince (talk | contribs)99 edits →Editing Battle of Chawinda !: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| Hello. The ] for the ] arbitration case, which you are listed to as a party, has been posted. Thank you, --''']''' (] / ] / ]) via ] (]) 03:32, 1 June 2015 (UTC) | Hello. The ] for the ] arbitration case, which you are listed to as a party, has been posted. Thank you, --''']''' (] / ] / ]) via ] (]) 03:32, 1 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
| <!-- Message sent by User:L235@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:L235/sandbox&oldid=664964487 --> | <!-- Message sent by User:L235@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:L235/sandbox&oldid=664964487 --> | ||
| == Editing ] ! == | |||
| Well dude if you will see the history of Battle of Chawinda , 1 month ago "Mar4d" has edited the chawinda battle and added stupid claim about territory lost! | |||
| he added this " Over 4,140 km territory lost " to the casualties2 ( INDIA ) section! | |||
| well we all know that battle of chawinda was fought in the Sialkot sector that is in Pakistan. Then how can India lost territory there? He mentioned "Over 4,140 km". | |||
| well dude chawinda was a battle and a part of Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 , | |||
| whole worlds knows that War of 1965 was won by India because it held more territory of enemy, took more causality on enemy ..... And so on, | |||
| well if you will see the " Assessment of losses" or Neutral Claims in Indo-Pakistani War of 1965, it was mentioned by almost all the independent sources that India held 1,840km2 land of Pakistan and Pakistan held ~ 540km2 land of India at the end of hostilities. | |||
| even Pakistan owns fabricated history doesn't claim about " 4,140 km2 " , | |||
| then how can someone mention imaginary claims on the Much debated ] , although it was the battle and fought well Inside pakistani territory in the Sialkot sector, so mentioning whole war losses in the battle that doesn't even match with the reality ...... , only a stupid can do this, | |||
| Dude, why aren't you are reverting the edit done by that stupid, I am informing you about this because, few dumb Pakistanis like Top Gun are don't letting me editing the chawinda, | |||
| thanks for your kind attention and I will request you to revert that change done by Mar4d ( 1 Month ago ) , | |||
| Thank you! | |||
Revision as of 14:48, 1 June 2015
OccultZone (talk · contribs · logs · email · block log · global contribs)
| This is OccultZone's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 |
Waiting for you
Can you please revisit Template:Did you know nominations/Private Apartments of the Winter Palace? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:48, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Done Thanks for the reminder. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 06:51, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
- We will wait for your return, - for the cabal of the outcasts (feel free to join) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:55, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi
Please take a look at the article Von Sydow murders, and Ahrensburg Castle. If you find time for it. Thanks.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:15, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
- Schloss Ahrensburg, needs ce, I only took the lead, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:57, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
American politics 2 arbitration proposed decision posted
Hello. The proposed decision for the American politics 2 arbitration case, which you are listed to as a party, has been posted. Thank you, --L235 (t / c / ping in reply) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:32, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Editing Battle of Chawinda !
Well dude if you will see the history of Battle of Chawinda , 1 month ago "Mar4d" has edited the chawinda battle and added stupid claim about territory lost!
he added this " Over 4,140 km territory lost " to the casualties2 ( INDIA ) section!
well we all know that battle of chawinda was fought in the Sialkot sector that is in Pakistan. Then how can India lost territory there? He mentioned "Over 4,140 km".
well dude chawinda was a battle and a part of Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 ,
whole worlds knows that War of 1965 was won by India because it held more territory of enemy, took more causality on enemy ..... And so on,
well if you will see the " Assessment of losses" or Neutral Claims in Indo-Pakistani War of 1965, it was mentioned by almost all the independent sources that India held 1,840km2 land of Pakistan and Pakistan held ~ 540km2 land of India at the end of hostilities.
even Pakistan owns fabricated history doesn't claim about " 4,140 km2 " ,
then how can someone mention imaginary claims on the Much debated Battle of Chawinda , although it was the battle and fought well Inside pakistani territory in the Sialkot sector, so mentioning whole war losses in the battle that doesn't even match with the reality ...... , only a stupid can do this,
Dude, why aren't you are reverting the edit done by that stupid, I am informing you about this because, few dumb Pakistanis like Top Gun are don't letting me editing the chawinda, thanks for your kind attention and I will request you to revert that change done by Mar4d ( 1 Month ago ) ,
Thank you!