Talk:Battle of Chawinda: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 10:33, 3 June 2015 editAstral Prince (talk \| contribs)99 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:26, 3 June 2015 edit undoAstral Prince (talk \| contribs)99 edits →It was a Stalemate and not a Pakistani victory!: new sectionNext edit →
Line 76:		Line 76:

	Thanks dude! ] (]) 10:33, 3 June 2015 (UTC)		Thanks dude! ] (]) 10:33, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

			== It was a Stalemate and not a Pakistani victory! ==

			Well this article ] is full of ] , uses fake claims which don't even supported by maintained references.

			it claims that Pakistan won the ] . The three reference mentioned there didn't claim pakistani victory, rather it was a stalemate, that we all know. Only thing Pakistan did is that they didn't let Superior Indian forces advance further and U.N Mandated ceasefire. This is how the battle ended.

			have a look to the infobox <ref>Http://ebook.worldlibrary.net/Article.aspx?ArticleId=0003204540&Title=Battle%20of%20Chawinda</ref> This is what mentioned earlier in Misplaced Pages I,e,. Result = stalemate , and un mandated ceasefire.

			here are the reference mentioned in Misplaced Pages that claims the battle a stalemate but Few Pakistanis have written " Pakistan victory " in the result section that is ] .

			RESULT = Stalemate.<ref name="Allan">{{cite book\|last=Fricker\|first=John\|title=Battle for Pakistan: the air war of 1965\|year=1979\|publisher=I. Allan\|location=University of Michigan\|pages=128\|ISBN=978-0-71-100929-5}}</ref><ref name="Amin 2010 54">{{cite book\|last=Amin\|first=Shahid M.\|title=Pakistan's foreign policy: a reappraisal\|year=2010\|publisher=Oxford University Press\|location=Northwestern University\|isbn=978-0-19-547912-6\|pages=54}}</ref>

			<ref></ref>

			only claims 25 Cavalry defeated there better equipped but clumsier foes like 2 armoured brigade defeated there opponent in Asal Uttar. It didn't claim pakistani victory at all.

			so Make few changes in the article mention stalemate in the result section.
			thank you ] (]) 14:26, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:26, 3 June 2015

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Chawinda article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 6 months

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

India: History High‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Pakistan Mid‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Pakistani history.

Military history: Asian / Indian / South Asia / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Indian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force
	World War II task force

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Chawinda article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 6 months

Semi-protected edit request on 7 April 2015

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Justudassar (talk) 14:53, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Kharkiv07 15:06, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Territory Lost!

TopGun , OccultZone , Rsrikanth05 , Well dude if you will see the history of Battle of Chawinda , 1 month ago "Mar4d" has edited the chawinda battle and added stupid claim about territory lost!

he added this " Over 4,140 km territory lost " to the casualties2 ( INDIA ) section!

well we all know that battle of chawinda was fought in the Sialkot sector that is in Pakistan. Then how can India lost territory there? He mentioned "Over 4,140 km".

well dude chawinda was a battle and a part of Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 ,

whole worlds knows that War of 1965 was won by India because it held more territory of enemy, took more causality on enemy ..... And so on,

well if you will see the " Assessment of losses" or Neutral Claims in Indo-Pakistani War of 1965, it was mentioned by almost all the independent sources that India held 1,840km2 land of Pakistan and Pakistan held ~ 540km2 land of India at the end of hostilities.

even Pakistan owns fabricated history doesn't claim about " 4,140 km2 " ,

then how can someone mention imaginary claims on the Much debated Battle of Chawinda , although it was the battle and fought well Inside pakistani territory in the Sialkot sector, so mentioning whole war losses in the battle that doesn't even match with the reality ...... , only a stupid can do this,

are you guys sleeping when he edited the Battle of Chawinda it, why you all are not reverting the edit done by that stupid, and why you don't let me do revert it?

thanks for your kind attention and I will request you to revert that change done by Mar4d ( 1 Month ago ) ,

Thank you! Astral Prince (talk) 14:12, 1 June 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Astral Prince (talk • contribs) 14:02, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

your were right I just checked the source cited and does not state the facts as claimed in the content! Shrikanthv (talk) 06:12, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks dude! Astral Prince (talk) 10:33, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

It was a Stalemate and not a Pakistani victory!

Well this article Battle of Chawinda is full of WP:FAKE , uses fake claims which don't even supported by maintained references.

it claims that Pakistan won the Battle of Chawinda . The three reference mentioned there didn't claim pakistani victory, rather it was a stalemate, that we all know. Only thing Pakistan did is that they didn't let Superior Indian forces advance further and U.N Mandated ceasefire. This is how the battle ended.

have a look to the infobox This is what mentioned earlier in Misplaced Pages I,e,. Result = stalemate , and un mandated ceasefire.

here are the reference mentioned in Misplaced Pages that claims the battle a stalemate but Few Pakistanis have written " Pakistan victory " in the result section that is WP:FAKE .

RESULT = Stalemate.

only claims 25 Cavalry defeated there better equipped but clumsier foes like 2 armoured brigade defeated there opponent in Asal Uttar. It didn't claim pakistani victory at all.

so Make few changes in the article mention stalemate in the result section. thank you Astral Prince (talk) 14:26, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Http://ebook.worldlibrary.net/Article.aspx?ArticleId=0003204540&Title=Battle%20of%20Chawinda
Fricker, John (1979). Battle for Pakistan: the air war of 1965. University of Michigan: I. Allan. p. 128. ISBN 978-0-71-100929-5.
Amin, Shahid M. (2010). Pakistan's foreign policy: a reappraisal. Northwestern University: Oxford University Press. p. 54. ISBN 978-0-19-547912-6.
The M47 and M48 Patton Tanks By Steven J. Zaloga Pg. 36

Categories: