Misplaced Pages

User:Steve/Sandbox: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User:Steve Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:00, 22 May 2013 editSteve (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,235 editsm done← Previous edit Revision as of 20:24, 3 June 2015 edit undoSteve (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,235 edits +Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{editnotice
| header = Wait!
| headerstyle = font-size: 150%;
| textstyle = font-size: 110%;
| text = Before nominating an article, please ensure it meets ''all'' the ]:
*Prose must be engaging and of a professional standard.
*The article must be representative of the relevant literature on the subject.
*All claims must be cited to high-quality, ], with consistently formatted inline citations using one of the ].
*The article must be ], stable and follow the ].
*The ] must adequately summarize an appropriately structured article body.
*Images must be adequately tagged and sourced, and follow the ] and, where applicable, the ] content ].
If you are unsure that the article meets these standards, ] may be a more appropriate venue. The FAC coordinators can remove an unprepared nomination at their discretion after at least one reviewer has suggested it be withdrawn.

;Further advice
*Make sure you have consulted prior to nomination.
*Double-check for ], including the inadvertent ] of information from other sources, and too-close ].
*Finally, to help resolve the FAC backlog, making it more likely that reviewers will see your nomination, please consider ] existing ], especially those listed on ]. Good luck!
&nbsp;
}}

Revision as of 20:24, 3 June 2015

Wait!

Before nominating an article, please ensure it meets all the featured article criteria:

  • Prose must be engaging and of a professional standard.
  • The article must be representative of the relevant literature on the subject.
  • All claims must be cited to high-quality, reliable sources, with consistently formatted inline citations using one of the approved methods.
  • The article must be neutral, stable and follow the style guidelines.
  • The lead must adequately summarize an appropriately structured article body.
  • Images must be adequately tagged and sourced, and follow the image use policy and, where applicable, the non-free content criteria for inclusion.

If you are unsure that the article meets these standards, Peer Review may be a more appropriate venue. The FAC coordinators can remove an unprepared nomination at their discretion after at least one reviewer has suggested it be withdrawn.

Further advice