Misplaced Pages

User talk:Urs Etan: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:10, 10 June 2015 editJytdog (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers187,951 edits Conflict of interest in Misplaced Pages: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 00:14, 10 June 2015 edit undoJytdog (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers187,951 editsNo edit summaryTag: contentious topics alertNext edit →
Line 34: Line 34:


You seem to have some connection to all that. Please disclose those connections, so we can open a discussion about your conflicts of interest here. Thanks. ] (]) 00:10, 10 June 2015 (UTC) You seem to have some connection to all that. Please disclose those connections, so we can open a discussion about your conflicts of interest here. Thanks. ] (]) 00:10, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

{{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.''

'''Please carefully read this information:'''

The Arbitration Committee has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ].

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. If you have questions, please contact me.
}} ] (]) 00:14, 10 June 2015 (UTC){{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert -->

Revision as of 00:14, 10 June 2015


Recent edits to Frankie Boyle

Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Misplaced Pages is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! {C  A S U K I T E  } 21:50, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

1RR Gerry Adams

ConsensusThe article Gerry Adams, along with other articles relating to The Troubles, is currently subject to active arbitration remedies, as laid out during a previous Arbitration Enforcement case that closed in October 2007, and was amended by community consensus in October 2008. The current restrictions are:
  • All editors on Troubles-related articles are directed to get the advice of neutral parties via means such as outside opinions.
  • All articles related to The Troubles, defined as: any article that could be reasonably construed as being related to The Troubles, Irish nationalism, and British nationalism in relation to Ireland falls under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per day). When in doubt, assume it is related.
    • Clear vandalism, or edits by anonymous IP editors, may be reverted without penalty
  • Editors who violate this 1RR restriction may be blocked without warning by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.
If you are a new editor, or an editor unfamiliar with the situation, please follow the guidelines laid out in the above link. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it on this talk page first. Thank you.

Murry1975 (talk) 10:11, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Cynefin article

Assuming your edit is not a hangover from disagreements on Welsh people then you need to respond to the talk page comment in respect of the edit you have restored. Changing scholar to salesmen (when a click on the linked article would have seen the academic record and reading the article would have shown the academic citations) is a personal attack. I've requested admin oversight heret ----Snowded 05:47, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Well Dave, it seems to me you where the salesmen of the IBM Cynefin Centre between 2001 and 2005 and sales for Cognitive-Edge since 2005. And yes you also have some academic credentials. That holds for many, including myself :-).Hvgard (talk) 08:32, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Director Harold and it was a fully funded research body within IBM. All of the basic Cynefin development was within my UK group in IBM, then in the IKM within IBM then the Cynefin Centre. All of those were IBM funded research programmes. Its reflected in the citations for the articles produced from that period and the academic awards (that is called evidence by the way). I look forward to your amendments to Misplaced Pages articles about other academics who also have commercial companies, a mass change to sales would be an interesting proposition. ----Snowded 08:43, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Only warning

As someone who's been here since 2013, you should know that neither hoaxing nor original research is appropriate. When you made this edit, you were well aware that the statement "In 2014 doubts were raised regarding the solidity of the approach when the IRC" was not supported by http://www.irc.nl, and you were also well aware that nothing addressing the concept of "Cynefin" was said in the other source: either that, like the first citation, is a hoax, or it requires original research. Neither will be tolerated: I have protected the page to prevent such editing, and if you persist after protection expires, you will be blocked as a means of enforcing our policies. Nyttend (talk) 11:43, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. My concerns about COI on that article have been taken up by an experienced editor active at COIN, and the conflicted editor appears to have acknowledged the potential COI and taken steps to more fully disclose it. I'm content to leave it at that. Urs Etan (talk) 23:34, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

It seems things have changed a bit. Good COI discussion going on at the Cynefin talk page https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Cynefin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hvgard (talkcontribs) 08:29, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Conflict of interest in Misplaced Pages

Hi Urs Etan - you appear to be aware of the discussions I have had with Dave and Harold with regard to their financial COIs and the very separate, and perhaps more serious, COI caused by their disputes external to Misplaced Pages.

You seem to have some connection to all that. Please disclose those connections, so we can open a discussion about your conflicts of interest here. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 00:10, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. If you have questions, please contact me.

Jytdog (talk) 00:14, 10 June 2015 (UTC)Template:Z33