Revision as of 20:12, 6 June 2015 editThis is Paul (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers159,635 edits →The undoing of Ed Miliband: reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:51, 11 June 2015 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,292,842 editsm Archiving 3 discussion(s) to Talk:Ed Miliband/Archive 3) (botNext edit → | ||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
|archive = Talk:Ed Miliband/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = Talk:Ed Miliband/Archive %(counter)d | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Ted Milliband == | |||
http://www.itv.com/news/meridian/2015-05-05/exclusive-ed-milibands-first-ever-tv-appearance-as-a-fresh-faced-student/ | |||
Is it worth noting that he used to go by Ted? | |||
] (]) 08:24, 7 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
:Trivial so no ----] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 08:59, 7 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
== Page hacked? == | |||
The only thing I see is a red page with Ed Miliband's picture and 'Vote Miliband'? Does anybody knows what's going on? --] (]) 15:09, 7 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
::I've found the source. It was by anonymous user 87.100.227.109 that caused all the trouble.--] (]) 15:18, 7 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
:::Unfortunately it's already picked up by press: .--] (]) 15:37, 7 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
::::Hopefully they won't have had time to get . ] (]) 18:15, 7 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
== Semi-protected edit request on 7 May 2015 == | |||
{{edit semi-protected|Ed Miliband|answered=yes}} | |||
<!-- Begin request --> | |||
this page has been hacked | |||
<!-- End request --> | |||
] (]) 18:59, 7 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
:] '''Already done'''<!-- Template:ESp --> Vandalism has already been fixed, thanks for reporting. ] (]) 19:53, 7 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
== Someone elses moves == | == Someone elses moves == |
Revision as of 23:51, 11 June 2015
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ed Miliband article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Ed Miliband has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Someone elses moves
I removed a detail that is from someone else's bio, as it is It is irrelevant to Ed Miliband . It is distracting in reading (as the text says later on: his father had 'roving' career, that should do it. Correctly, not all subsequenct job changes of another person are mentioned here). However, it was reverted twice by Bus stop. Full sequence, for the es's: 1: , rv by BS 2: , rv by BS: ).
Bus stop motivated the inclusion by explaining that that other person was his father no less, and what had happened to his father. However, I do not dispute those facts. I state that these facts are irrelevant to this bio. How is it noteworthy for Ed's bio that his father was at the LSE (or even that his father was not at LSE any more)? I see no relevant connection. Including an irrelevant fact is confusing too.
Maybe Bus stop is not convinced by this, but others might think about it. I propose removal. -DePiep (talk) 09:02, 13 May 2015 (UTC) -DePiep (talk) 09:23, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Needs clarification on resignation
A 5 word mention of his resignation and defeat in the GE isn't really that sufficient. I've added some information but I think someone should add information seat losses etc. 86.128.123.174 (talk) 13:37, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
The undoing of Ed Miliband
Quite an interesting piece from The Guardian here that might be worth using in this article. This is Paul (talk) 21:24, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- It's a good article, but I'm struggling to find notable facts that can be used. Any ideas? SocialDem (talk) 13:29, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- A few things spring to mind, although without reading through the Misplaced Pages article again, I don't know if we've used them already. But here goes:
- There's the disastrous party conference speech in which he forgot to mention the economy.
- Labour's apparent lack of direction before and during the election campaign.
- Making reasonably good points about the direction of the coalition that were often never followed up.
- The so-called Ed Stone.
- Tory speculation of a Labour-SNP coalition.
- Forget now, but I think they may also have mentioned a lack of narrative post-2010 that allowed the coalition to blame Labour for creating a world recession.
- Possibly not all of this would be relevant here, but I'm happy to read through this again at some point in the next few days and make more suggestions. Cheers, This is Paul (talk) 14:25, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- A few things spring to mind, although without reading through the Misplaced Pages article again, I don't know if we've used them already. But here goes:
- Thanks, some of these are good points and could do with inclusion. Guess I'm reluctant to use too much stuff based on "he said, she said", so I think it's worth looking for supporting sources.
- For what it's worth, I'm currently working through this book to flesh out the 2012-2014 years which are a bit bare at the moment. Can hopefully include some of the Wintour article too. SocialDem (talk) 15:31, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Looks like quite a useful book, and great work so far btw. This is Paul (talk) 20:12, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- For what it's worth, I'm currently working through this book to flesh out the 2012-2014 years which are a bit bare at the moment. Can hopefully include some of the Wintour article too. SocialDem (talk) 15:31, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages good articles
- Social sciences and society good articles
- Biography articles of living people
- All unassessed articles
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Mid-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class University of Oxford articles
- Low-importance University of Oxford articles
- GA-Class University of Oxford (colleges) articles
- WikiProject University of Oxford articles
- GA-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- Top-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- GA-Class Yorkshire articles
- High-importance Yorkshire articles
- WikiProject Yorkshire articles
- GA-Class Economics articles
- Low-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- GA-Class London-related articles
- Low-importance London-related articles
- GA-Class organized labour articles
- Mid-importance organized labour articles
- WikiProject Organized Labour articles
- GA-Class socialism articles
- High-importance socialism articles
- WikiProject Socialism articles
- Misplaced Pages articles that use British English