Misplaced Pages

User talk:39.53.177.93: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:59, 16 June 2015 editAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,557,922 editsm Substing templates: {{vandal2}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info.← Previous edit Revision as of 04:08, 16 June 2015 edit undoKuru (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators203,976 edits Temporary blockNext edit →
Line 17: Line 17:


'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> --] (]) 03:48, 16 June 2015 (UTC) '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> --] (]) 03:48, 16 June 2015 (UTC)


<div style="padding:5px; border:1px solid #c0c090; background-color:#FCC;" class="user-block"> ] You have been ] from editing for in accordance with ] as a result of your repeated ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your ''']''' by adding the text <nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki> . ] ] 04:08, 16 June 2015 (UTC)</div><!-- {{uw-block1}} --> <br clear="both">

Revision as of 04:08, 16 June 2015


June 2015

Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kevin Owens has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kevin Owens was changed by 39.53.177.93 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95858 on 2015-06-16T02:45:29+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:45, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did at Kevin Owens. Fazbear7891 (talk) 02:52, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Kevin Owens. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --SpyMagician (talk) 03:06, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Kevin Owens shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --SpyMagician (talk) 03:48, 16 June 2015 (UTC)


You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy as a result of your repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} . Kuru (talk) 04:08, 16 June 2015 (UTC)