| Revision as of 06:07, 16 June 2015 editJohn from Idegon (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers107,583 edits Final warning: Removal of content, blanking. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:10, 16 June 2015 edit undoGiacomo1968 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers12,809 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| ] You may be '''] without further warning''' the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:uw-delete4 --> ] (]) 06:07, 16 June 2015 (UTC) | ] You may be '''] without further warning''' the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:uw-delete4 --> ] (]) 06:07, 16 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
| :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | ||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> --] (]) 06:10, 16 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:10, 16 June 2015
June 2015
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kevin Owens has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kevin Owens was changed by 2001:590:3C03:55:2511:1C9:F223:5541 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958601 on 2015-06-16T05:05:36+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:05, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to Kevin Owens, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. (talk to) TheOtherGaelan('s contributions) 05:06, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Misplaced Pages. John from Idegon (talk) 06:07, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Your recent editing history at Kevin Owens shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --SpyMagician (talk) 06:10, 16 June 2015 (UTC)