| Revision as of 18:43, 16 June 2015 editRGloucester (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers38,757 edits →Assistance: r← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:17, 17 June 2015 edit undoFlyer22 Frozen (talk | contribs)365,630 edits →Permit WP:Red links in WP:Navboxes?: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
| :::I've posted a reminder about your message on their talk page, just in case they missed or forgot your message. ] (]) 17:56, 14 June 2015 (UTC) | :::I've posted a reminder about your message on their talk page, just in case they missed or forgot your message. ] (]) 17:56, 14 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
| ::::He's asked for someone else to complete the review, as he's occupied. ] — ] 18:43, 16 June 2015 (UTC) | ::::He's asked for someone else to complete the review, as he's occupied. ] — ] 18:43, 16 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
| == Permit ] in ]? == | |||
| Opinions are needed on the following matter: ]; subsection is at ]. A ] for the matter is . ] (]) 20:17, 17 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:17, 17 June 2015
 | Please direct any comments regarding the improvement of the GA program as a whole to WikiProject Good Articles. Thank you. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Good articles page. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16Auto-archiving period: 7 days  |
 Archives | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Civil servants
David Bednar was notable as a theatre exec, in the corporate world. But his legacy is as general manager of an independent non profit corp, the Canadian National Exhibition Association. There's no category for government employees... Do I just put him under the businessperson section? -- Zanimum (talk) 21:34, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- There a politics and government category, which might be appropriate for civil servants? Cordless Larry (talk) 09:02, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the response. I'm not sure he's a "political figure", though. Would it be kosher to create a new subcategory of "Politics and government"? -- Zanimum (talk) 18:25, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, Zanimum, I missed your reply. Did you get this sorted? Cordless Larry (talk) 10:26, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the response. I'm not sure he's a "political figure", though. Would it be kosher to create a new subcategory of "Politics and government"? -- Zanimum (talk) 18:25, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 19 April 2015
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Messi's goals in La Liga is 278 not 400. 139.194.97.251 (talk) 09:31, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Not done: this is the talk page for discussing improvements to the page Misplaced Pages:Good articles. Please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned. Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 10:59, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Good articles in the Signpost
As you may know, we've started providing bare lists of GA promotions in the featured content section of the Signpost.
We're fine for this week, since the cutoff is always a week and a half before publication (otherwise, we'd have three days to do the work in), but we have a problem for next week: - I don't know if it'll resume sanity from the 16th, but the entries for the 13th and 14th are completely corrupt, and I suspect the 15th of being problematic as well.
So... anyone have any ideas? I'd prefer not to screw people out of recognition because the bot went crazy, but I've been depending on that for entries, and I'll have to drop the feature if I have to spend an entire day compiling them every week. Adam Cuerden 01:49, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Good Lists
There is a proposal to set up a new classification level, Good List. Please add your comments there. --Redrose64 (talk) 10:13, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Good article reassessment backlog
There is a backlog of articles waiting for community reassessment at Misplaced Pages:Good article reassessment, and DragonZero informs me that they're the only editor who has been closing these for the past year or so. That doesn't seem fair to me, so assistance from other editors would be welcome. Cordless Larry (talk) 17:19, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Assistance
It seems that a reviewer for an article that I nominated has disappeared. Would anyone care to take a look? RGloucester — ☎ 15:26, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
- Apparently you are right; I wonder if you scared them off. I see however that they are very active elsewhere and that you have not tried to contact them. Could you please send positive statements their way, encouraging them to return? If that does not work, you will have to reset and try again; I can help you with the necessary paperwork if that is needed. Good luck. Prhartcom (talk) 15:51, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
- The user has not responded to my talk page query. I do not see why I should have to reset. The article was in the queue for months prior to being picked up. RGloucester — ☎ 17:44, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- I've posted a reminder about your message on their talk page, just in case they missed or forgot your message. Cordless Larry (talk) 17:56, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- He's asked for someone else to complete the review, as he's occupied. RGloucester — ☎ 18:43, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- I've posted a reminder about your message on their talk page, just in case they missed or forgot your message. Cordless Larry (talk) 17:56, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- The user has not responded to my talk page query. I do not see why I should have to reset. The article was in the queue for months prior to being picked up. RGloucester — ☎ 17:44, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Permit WP:Red links in WP:Navboxes?
Opinions are needed on the following matter: Misplaced Pages talk:Red link#Guideline revision urgently needed; subsection is at Misplaced Pages talk:Red link#Revision proposal. A WP:Permalink for the matter is here. Flyer22 (talk) 20:17, 17 June 2015 (UTC)