Misplaced Pages

talk:Featured articles: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:49, 5 May 2015 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,303,272 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:Featured articles/Archive 16) (bot← Previous edit Revision as of 20:18, 17 June 2015 edit undoFlyer22 Frozen (talk | contribs)365,630 edits Permit WP:Red links in WP:Navboxes?: new sectionNext edit →
Line 63: Line 63:


There is a proposal to set up a new classification level, ]. Please add your comments there. --] (]) 10:19, 4 May 2015 (UTC) There is a proposal to set up a new classification level, ]. Please add your comments there. --] (]) 10:19, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

== Permit ] in ]? ==

Opinions are needed on the following matter: ]; subsection is at ]. A ] for the matter is . ] (]) 20:18, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:18, 17 June 2015

FACs needing feedback
viewedit
How You Get the Girl Review it now
2007 Greensburg tornado Review it now


Featured article removal candidates
Boogeyman 2 Review now
Shoshone National Forest Review now
Northrop YF-23 Review now
Emmy Noether Review now
Concerto delle donne Review now
See also: Misplaced Pages:Unreviewed featured articles
Archiving icon
Archives


This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.
Shortcut

redirect appropriate?

Would it be appropriate to redirect the term 'list of featured articles' to this page? This is the current result of the search. If not this then how about the term 'list of wikipedia featured articles'? Neuroxic (talk) 02:05, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

I agree, this would make it a lot easier to search for this, and I don't see any downsides.----MASHAUNIX 23:00, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
If no one else is concerned I'll go ahead with it then. Neuroxic (talk) 06:12, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

splitting media section

The media section is simply too large.

This may not be a problem on its own, but I feel the page would be better organized if the section was split into a film, tv and miscellaneous (media) section.

This would certainly make finding featured examples of flims, tv episodes, tv shows and others easier.

Neuroxic (talk) 09:11, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Discussion regarding the WP:Overlinking guideline

Opinions are needed on the following matter: Misplaced Pages talk:Manual of Style/Linking#Relax duplicate linking rule. A WP:Permalink for the discussion is here. You might also want to check out the Comments please on avoidable links and Nested links sections lower on that talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 21:22, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 7 April 2015

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

107.147.19.198 (talk) 22:22, 7 April 2015 (UTC) Hello, I was wondering if I could edit? There is some things that need editing.

Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone will add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. Kharkiv07 22:25, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Good Lists

There is a proposal to set up a new classification level, Good List. Please add your comments there. --Redrose64 (talk) 10:19, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Permit WP:Red links in WP:Navboxes?

Opinions are needed on the following matter: Misplaced Pages talk:Red link#Guideline revision urgently needed; subsection is at Misplaced Pages talk:Red link#Revision proposal. A WP:Permalink for the matter is here. Flyer22 (talk) 20:18, 17 June 2015 (UTC)