Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 21:39, 18 June 2015

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Medicine Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Organizations This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. California: San Francisco Bay Area Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as High-importance).

Kaiser Permanente received a peer review by Misplaced Pages editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Archives

2005-2007.

Archive

I have created an archive of the old discussions. There were no current discussions about improving this article, and the talk page was really long. In case anyone needs to know in the future, I used the Move Page method. WhatamIdoing (talk) 03:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Kaiser Permanente.png

Image:Kaiser Permanente.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Misplaced Pages article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:32, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Lupoe murders

We have to be careful what we write. BLP is for people, not entities, but even entities deserve fair consideration. We don't know if a clerk told Lupoe to kill himself. Disclaimer: I don't have any relationship, past or present, with Kaiser. In fact, I don't think particularly highly of them Spevw (talk) 02:18, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

We do know what we read in reliable sources. We can report what they say, but need to make sure we don't go beyond what they say. However I'm not sure that this tragedy belongs in the article. I'm sure that, unfortunately, many corporations have fired people who've gone on to commit suicide. Even if the boss did make the alleged comment, it does not make the corporation culpable.   Will Beback  talk  02:27, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

• Good point. Agree. Ucla90024 (talk) 05:42, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Someone deleted the material, and it was restored, so I looked into it to see if there was more reporting - if the story had "legs". The only two reports in the past week have been a general editorial about seeking assistance before situations become desperate and a report about the funerals. The latter includes the information that the parents were fired "for trying to defraud their employer". Rather than fill out the story with this unhappy detail, I again think it's better to remove the material from this article so that's what I'm goping to do. It's a sad case, but it really isn't about Kaiser.   Will Beback  talk  22:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

So I am not sure who is behind the IP that has multiple times cut the story and references both from the KP article and from the hospitals.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Portal:Current_events/2009_January_27&diff=prev&oldid=267145941 current event page when the story happened. I personally am fine with Lupoe not being in the KP article, feel that as they are dead, they cannot defend against the charge of "trying to defraud their employer" (which I feel is suspect, but what ever), and believe that Kaiser did not pull the trigger on Lupoe to pull the trigger on his family. I do believe it is part of a larger story reflective of Kaiser's handling and support of it's employees as well as reflective of the economy of Wilmington. But that is not what the Misplaced Pages article is about.

Thank you for letting me having my say. Peace, rkmlai (talk) 00:09, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Dubious?

"One of the most dubious ventures of the Permanente Company is Kaiser Permanente Ventures, a venture capital firm that invests in emerging medical technologies." Why is this dubious? Magmagoblin2 (talk) 02:12, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

It's weasely at best, and likely just a random editor's opinion. I suspect the editor that inserted it may find it "dubious" that a not-for-profit health plan has a for-profit investment arm, but it's unsourced and ought to be removed. jæs (talk) 18:34, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Article not NPOV

In reading through this article, it appears to have a flavor more like a polemic antipathetic to Henry Kaiser and appears editorial and very POV in nature, especially in the HISTORY section. I would suggest the following: 1) if there is serious evidence that Henry Kaiser's re-involvement with the organization caused problems, then remove judgmental words like 'micromanaged' and cite sources with hard numbers, ie show with properly footnoted citations that revenue X1 and membership X2 went to some lower levels Y1 and Y2. 2) while some of the language used here may be quoted from footnoted sources, it is still clearly judgmental in nature and needs to be toned down to meet the NPOV criterion "Prefer non-judgmental language"; 3 Follow the NPOV standards throughout the article... I see from a preceding post here that much of the editing here has been done by a former KP employee with an ax grind... perhaps a more neutral editor who has access to the mentioned and footnoted sources and to other citations on the subject that balances the OPINION shown here can come up with a reasonable re-wording L. Greg (talk) 03:33, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

The article is neutral; you're reading too much into it. I drafted most of the first part of the history section, which was based on a history of Kaiser Permanente that was done with KP's cooperation (but was not sponsored by it) and was clearly pro-KP and pro-HMO. There was a LOT of detail in there about how Henry Kaiser came in and along with the hapless Garfield nearly ran KP into the ground until Clifford Keene took over. But I didn't have the time or energy to put all that in, plus 90% of people aren't interested in reading all that tedious detail (this is an encyclopedia, not a compendium). That's why I wrote that section the way I did, to summarize the content of the book so readers interested in the gory details can go pursue them if they need it. --Coolcaesar (talk) 05:38, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Kaiser Foundation

This Canadian mental health organization shares a logo, thus is somehow connected. a link should be provided, not sure where, or whether it deserves a full section.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 08:33, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

The "somehow connected" appears to be via people, and disclaims any institutional links. The Canadian group's "about the founder" page states

"In 1985, Mr. Kaiser established and funded the Kaiser Foundation as a separate and distinct entity from other Kaiser family endeavours."

"Mr. Kaiser and his family have a long history in the not-for-profit health care field through the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation and through the Kaiser Permanente HMO. Kaiser Permanente was the first HMO established in the United States. Mr. Kaiser is Chairman Emeritus of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation."

So there may be some linkage to the Kaiser Family Foundation, but there appears to be no formal connection to Kaiser Permanente. Argyriou (talk) 16:55, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Medical centers

with 35 medical centers (hospitals), i think we should have them included in the article. any of them which offer Emergency Services should have their own articles, esp. if they have high trauma center ratings.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:16, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

UK/British health service (NHS)

The reference to the NHS and UK Department of Health is too favourable to Kaiser Permanente (KP). The study was conducted more than 10 years ago and its impact on NHS/UK health services is vastly overstated. The issue of health care reform in the UK is extremely politically sensitive at the moment and the KP/UK health connection here is written in a manner which seems to overstate its influence, coming across as politically biased towards certain party political ideas. It's just not very objective.

Adding Board of Directors and National Leadership

Greetings. The "Governance" section is a bit outdated and I would like to add a listing for Kaiser Permanente's current Boards of Directors and national leadership. I have included URLs for each leader's executive biography from Kaiser Permanente's corporate news website; in addition, this URL can serve as a third-party citation for this data: http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/people.asp?privcapId=173830

The suggested addition begins below. Thank you for your consideration.

Board of Directors Bernard J. Tyson Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Christine K. Cassel, MD, MACP

Thomas W. Chapman, MPH, EdD

Jeff Epstein

Daniel P. Garcia, JD Senior vice president and chief compliance and privacy officer

William R. Graber

J. Eugene Grigsby

Judith A. Johansen, JD

Kim J. Kaiser

Philip A. Marineau

Edward Pei

Meg Porfido, JD

Richard P. Shannon, MD

Cynthia A. Telles, PhD

Kaiser Permanente National Leaders

Bernard J. Tyson Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Jack Cochran, MD, FACS Executive director, The Permanente Federation, LLC

Gregory A. Adams Executive vice president, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals and Health Plan; Group president, Kaiser Permanente Northern California and Mid-Atlantic States; President, Kaiser Permanente Northern California

Benjamin K. Chu, MD, MPH, MACP Executive vice president, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals and Health Plan; Group president, Kaiser Permanente Southern California and Hawaii; President, Kaiser Permanente Southern California

Patrick Courneya, MD Executive vice president, Hospitals, Quality and Care Delivery Excellence; chief medical officer, Medicare Advantage, Cost and Prescription Drug Plans

Philip Fasano Executive vice president and chief information officer

Kathy Lancaster Executive vice president and chief financial officer, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals and Health Plan

Donna Lynne, DrPH Executive vice president Kaiser Foundation Hospitals and Health Plan, Inc.; Group president, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Northwest and Georgia; President, Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Colorado

Arthur M. Southam, MD, MBA, MPH Executive vice president, Health Plan Operations

Anthony A. Barrueta Senior vice president, Government Relations Raymond J. Baxter, PhD Senior vice president, Community Benefit, Research and Health Policy

Chuck Columbus Senior vice president and chief Human Resources officer, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals and Health Plan

Amy Compton-Phillips, MD Associate executive director, Quality, The Permanente Federation

Chris Grant Senior vice president, Corporate Development, Care Delivery Strategy and Venture Investments

Scott Young, MD Associate executive director, Clinical Care and Innovation, The Permanente Federation, Senior medical director and executive director, Care Management Institute

Mark Zemelman Senior vice president and general counsel

vggolla (talk) 23:05, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

I've added a section for the board of directors. I didn't find Misplaced Pages bios for any of the directors. I'm not sure the rest of the org chart would add much to the article. Given limited resources, keeping this sort of information up-to-date is a challenge for Misplaced Pages. It might be more useful to direct users to an official Kaiser website where they could find this info. Best regards,—Stepheng3 (talk) 00:14, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Violation of WP:NOR detected

The following sentence appears to violate Misplaced Pages:No original research: "Historians now believe then-President Richard Nixon specifically had Kaiser Permanente in mind when he signed the Health Maintenance Organization Act of 1973, as the organization was mentioned in an Oval Office discussion of the Act, where John Ehrlichman characterized Kaiser's philosophy thus: "All the incentives are toward less medical care, because the less care they give them, the more money they make." The first clause of this sentence is not actually stated in the source cited and is thus clearly original research. No particular "historian" is specifically quoted or cited as drawing that inference about what Nixon was thinking. Any objections before I remove this clear violation of Misplaced Pages policy? --Coolcaesar (talk) 21:55, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

There's a lot about this on the archive page of this page, Coolcaesar. Are you saying is a false transcript? It has a source - an audio file it links to. Only that would make it a "clear violation of Misplaced Pages policy", no? ... Oh, I guess you're saying "no particular historian" is unsupported - the quote is accurate but the attribution to "historians" isn't supported by a RS? --Elvey 14:46, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

"Historians" is a weasel word. Cite to specific historians and then rephrase it to say, "Several historians, such as A, B, and C, now believe..." Otherwise the statement is unsupported. --Coolcaesar (talk) 22:54, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Non-neutral POV content?

Hi. Vince from KP here. I’ve noticed that there’s an awful lot of editorializing that has crept into this article within the last week. More specifically, the section “Grossly Inadequate Mental Health Care” strikes me as very non-NPOV.

As I look at the article more, it also looks like someone copied the veterans section from a KP source. Most folks in my position probably wouldn’t complain, but I want to make sure we do right by Misplaced Pages just as much as we might seek fair treatment here.

Anyone willing to help here? Alternatively, I can author suggested text in my Sandbox for you all to evaluate. Let me know, and thank you. vggolla (talk) 00:12, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

I'd love to hear from Kaiser's current drug purchasing manager about why the Kaiser pharmacy charges 5-10 times as much for some generics compared to, say, Target. --Elvey 14:43, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

WP:NOTFORUM. Jytdog (talk) 14:59, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Did you follow the link I added? There's some encyclopedic content there. Certainly enlightening (in conjunction with the for-profit/not-for-profit split info) that Kaiser charges 5-10 TIMES as much <sic> as for-profit Target does to provide the same generic drug. Anyone willing to help flesh out some encyclopedic content about that?--Elvey 19:06, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Elvey what is the content you are proposing? Jytdog (talk) 00:06, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Jytdog Clarification regarding what parts of KP are/aren't for-profit, such as Kaiser's labs and pharmacies. Information I don't have access to, but Vince may.--Elvey 00:26, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

That is a different question. In any case, an answer from the drug purchasing manager posted here would not be a reliable source from which to create content. Jytdog (talk) 15:19, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

You really frequently misinterpret/misrepresent - I didn't imply Vince was the drug purchasing manager or a RS. Rather, I said Kaiser's drug purchasing manager is discussed here: . It's not a 'different question'. It's not a question at all. Again you misinterpret/misrepresent. Please stop doing that. If you have nothing constructive to say, please be quiet! --Elvey 17:28, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

we seem to miscommunicate frequently, yes. you started this thread wanting to ask their drug purchasing manager questions and when I asked what that had to do with content, you replied with the comment about clarifying their profit vs nonprofit business. Now you say that is not why you wanted to hear from their drug manager. Going around in circles here. Anyway, don't know what more there is to say here. Jytdog (talk) 21:39, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Whitewashing

Example: I noticed that the section “Grossly Inadequate Mental Health Care” seems to have been removed from the article entirely. Seems hard to see the imposition and unappealed payment of "a $4 million fine against Kaiser for not providing adequate health care to its customers" and a strike over the care failures as entirely unworthy of mention. The section above suggests a possible COI issue. User:Jytdog, please comment on your edit and suggest solution. --Elvey 07:59, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

i don't know if you are aware but there is a labor dispute between Kaiser and some of their staff. One of the union's arguments is that Kaiser is hurting patients by not providing enough staff to give adequate care. That content was clearly driven by that conflict and clearly violated NPOV. Jytdog (talk) 14:58, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Addressed/resolved. Discussion is here.--Elvey 09:51, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Still a lot of whitewashing needs remediation. E.g. no longer any mention of the $20-30 Billion in reserves KP has stashed away. http://www.marinij.com/health/20150319/california-drops-hammer-on-blue-shield-tax-exempt-status/1 says "Kaiser Permanente ... has $21.7 billion in cash reserves, more than 1,600 times the amount required by state regulations."--Elvey 15:49, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

are you for some reason unable to edit the article? Jytdog (talk) 16:05, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Again: The WP:DR POLICY states, "always explain your changes in the edit summary." and "If you are reverted, continue to explain yourself". Will you agree to start honoring that?--Elvey 23:27, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

• I did and do. Like i said, if there is NPOV well-sourced content you want to add, WP:FIXIT. Jytdog (talk) 15:17, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Black hat SEO - search engine optimization

The source code of the page that is the #1 hit at https://www.google.com/search?q=kaiser+for-profit+pharmacies includes the text "for-profit, retail pharmacies filled 73% of U.S. prescriptions in the first half of 2011, and many have to answer to shareholders. They’re more focused on turning a profit than helping you reduce your pharmacy costs." but the web page does not include that content. It appears to be invisible and appears backward when in-page searching is used. Screen shot. --Elvey 07:59, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

What does this have to do, with the content or sourcing of this article? Jytdog (talk) 15:00, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

See blinders.--Elvey 00:28, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on content, not contributors. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 15:26, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

• All unassessed articles
• B-Class medicine articles
• Low-importance medicine articles
• All WikiProject Medicine pages
• Unassessed organization articles
• Unknown-importance organization articles
• WikiProject Organizations articles
• B-Class California articles
• Mid-importance California articles
• B-Class San Francisco Bay Area articles
• High-importance San Francisco Bay Area articles
• San Francisco Bay Area task force articles
• WikiProject California articles
• Old requests for peer review