Misplaced Pages

Anti-Defamation League: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:14, 14 February 2003 view sourceStevertigo (talk | contribs)43,174 editsm Added first criticism of the ADL by Chomsky - more to come,...← Previous edit Revision as of 07:25, 14 February 2003 view source Stevertigo (talk | contribs)43,174 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''Anti-Defamation League''' (or '''ADL''') of B'nai B'rith is an American organization founded in 1918 that fights ] and bigotry. The '''Anti-Defamation League''' (or '''ADL''') of B'nai B'rith is an American organization founded in 1918 that claims to fight ] and bigotry.


With an annual budget of over $40 million, the ADL now has 29 offices domestically and 3 offices abroad. Increasingly, the ADL agenda has been turned towards pro-Israel activism. This has brought up the issue of where legitimate support for Israel ends and unacceptable suppression of pro-Palestinian viewpoints begins. With an annual budget of over $40 million, the ADL now has 29 offices domestically and 3 offices abroad. Increasingly, the ADL agenda has been turned towards pro-Israel activism. This has brought up the issue of where legitimate support for Israel ends and unacceptable suppression of pro-Palestinian viewpoints begins.

Revision as of 07:25, 14 February 2003

The Anti-Defamation League (or ADL) of B'nai B'rith is an American organization founded in 1918 that claims to fight anti-Semitism and bigotry.

With an annual budget of over $40 million, the ADL now has 29 offices domestically and 3 offices abroad. Increasingly, the ADL agenda has been turned towards pro-Israel activism. This has brought up the issue of where legitimate support for Israel ends and unacceptable suppression of pro-Palestinian viewpoints begins.

Although the Anti-Defamation League has not worked together with Arab-American and Muslim-American civil rights group (owing to disagreement concerning the Israeli-Palestine conflict), the Anti-Defamation League has on numerous occasions publicly condemned slurs against Islam.

The ADL website notes that "In the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks against America, ADL has responded to numerous incidents of violence and harassment against Arab Americans, Muslim Americans and other individuals or groups that are perceived to be of Middle Eastern descent. Our message is consistent and clear -- no one should be singled out for hatred, prejudice or blame based on their ethnicity or religion. American unity and democracy is founded on this important ideal."

ADL Responds to Violence and Harassment against Arab Americans and Muslim Americans

ADL Condemns Hate Literature Distribution at Honolulu Mosque

Some have criticized the Anti-Defamation League for allegedly suppressing free speech and the right of ethnic minorities to defend themselves from bigotry (including Black Muslims and Arabs). (What are the specifics of these alleged incidents?)

The ADL was founded in 1918 in response to the lynching of Leo Frank in Georgia on a trumped up murder charge of killing Mary Phagan. Ironically, the Frank case, which eventually led to the establishment of the Anti-Defamation League, also resulted in the revival of the Ku Klux Klan, then known as the Knights of Mary Phagan

Criticism of the ADL

Notably people have criticized the ADL for what is considered a heavy-handed and very one-sided approach: Noam Chomsky stated in his 1989 book Necessary Illusions:

"The ADL has virtually abandoned its earlier role as a civil rights organization, becoming 'one of the main pillars' of Israeli propaganda in the U.S., as the Israeli press casually describes it, engaged in surveillance, blacklisting, compilation of FBI-style files circulated to adherents for the purpose of defamation, angry public responses to criticism of Israeli actions, and so on.
"These efforts, buttressed by insinuations of anti-Semitism or direct accusations, are intended to deflect or undermine opposition to Israeli policies, including Israel's refusal, with U.S. support, to move towards a general political settlement."