Misplaced Pages

User talk:ATS: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:59, 25 June 2015 editDawnseeker2000 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers483,252 edits WP ratings← Previous edit Revision as of 03:02, 25 June 2015 edit undoATS (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers17,744 edits WP ratings: heheNext edit →
Line 28: Line 28:
:{{ping|Tbhotch}} ... which, I have to say, makes no sense in this case. It has long been my understanding that article ratings within the scope of a Wikiproject are done by people associated with that project. To do so while not logged in gives the impression that someone is, instead, randomly offering an otherwise detached rating. &mdash;]<b>&#47;</b>] 02:54, 25 June 2015 (UTC) :{{ping|Tbhotch}} ... which, I have to say, makes no sense in this case. It has long been my understanding that article ratings within the scope of a Wikiproject are done by people associated with that project. To do so while not logged in gives the impression that someone is, instead, randomly offering an otherwise detached rating. &mdash;]<b>&#47;</b>] 02:54, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
::Yes, it's definitely preferable to have users that are associated with wikiprojects doing the assessments. ] 02:59, 25 June 2015 (UTC) ::Yes, it's definitely preferable to have users that are associated with wikiprojects doing the assessments. ] 02:59, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Dawnseeker2000}} you mean, it's not a ''requirement''?! {{p|grin|size=20px}} &mdash;]<b>&#47;</b>] 03:02, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:02, 25 June 2015

Messages may be ignored or receive only a curt reply if they involve anything not on my watchlist. No disrespect intended.I will usually ping you in any reply here. If you ping me elsewhere, I will reply there.Automatic archival by lowercase sigmabot III.

Template:Archive box collapsible

James Horner

I know you deleted your question but felt you should get an answer. I protected in response to a request at RFPP (seen here). At the time, his death was not confirmed but editors were still putting in a death date. --NeilN 13:48, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

@NeilN: sounds good. I had seen it happen three times, if memory serves, and it seemed to have stopped—then again, I didn't even notice PP when it happened. ATinySliver/ 18:17, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

WP ratings

I'm not a "new user", I'm an experienced editor who prefers to not log in for simply tasks. 189.225.21.90 (talk) 02:45, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

@Tbhotch: ... which, I have to say, makes no sense in this case. It has long been my understanding that article ratings within the scope of a Wikiproject are done by people associated with that project. To do so while not logged in gives the impression that someone is, instead, randomly offering an otherwise detached rating. —ATinySliver/ 02:54, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Yes, it's definitely preferable to have users that are associated with wikiprojects doing the assessments. Dawnseeker2000 02:59, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
@Dawnseeker2000: you mean, it's not a requirement?! ATinySliver/ 03:02, 25 June 2015 (UTC)