Misplaced Pages

Anti-Defamation League: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:32, 14 February 2003 view sourceSnoyes (talk | contribs)12,299 edits NPOV'ing criticisms← Previous edit Revision as of 16:56, 14 February 2003 view source GrahamN (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,391 edits Correcting grammar in opening sentence; moving paragraph about its formation; restoring the Chomsky quote (I don't think "NPOV" allows one to delete an entire quote that is properly attributed)Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''Anti-Defamation League''' (or '''ADL''') of B'nai B'rith is an American organization founded in 1918 that fight ] and bigotry. The '''Anti-Defamation League''' (or '''ADL''') of B'nai B'rith is an American organization founded in 1918 to fight ] and bigotry.

Its formation was in response to the lynching of Leo Frank in Georgia on a trumped up murder charge of killing Mary Phagan. Ironically, the Frank case, which eventually led to the establishment of the Anti-Defamation League, also resulted in the revival of the ], then known as "the Knights of Mary Phagan".


With an annual budget of over $40 million, the ADL now has 29 offices domestically and 3 offices abroad. Increasingly, the ADL agenda has been turned towards pro-Israel activism. This has brought up the issue of where legitimate support for Israel ends and unacceptable suppression of pro-Palestinian viewpoints begins. With an annual budget of over $40 million, the ADL now has 29 offices domestically and 3 offices abroad. Increasingly, the ADL agenda has been turned towards pro-Israel activism. This has brought up the issue of where legitimate support for Israel ends and unacceptable suppression of pro-Palestinian viewpoints begins.
Line 5: Line 7:
Although the Anti-Defamation League has not worked together with Arab-American and Muslim-American civil rights group (owing to disagreement concerning the Israeli-Palestine conflict), the Anti-Defamation League has on numerous occasions publicly condemned slurs against Islam. Although the Anti-Defamation League has not worked together with Arab-American and Muslim-American civil rights group (owing to disagreement concerning the Israeli-Palestine conflict), the Anti-Defamation League has on numerous occasions publicly condemned slurs against Islam.


The ADL website notes that:
The ADL website notes that "In the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks against America, ADL has responded to numerous incidents of violence and harassment against Arab Americans, Muslim Americans and other individuals or groups that are perceived to be of Middle Eastern descent. Our message is consistent and clear -- no one should be singled out for hatred, prejudice or blame based on their ethnicity or religion. American unity and democracy is founded on this important ideal."

:''"In the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks against America, ADL has responded to numerous incidents of violence and harassment against Arab Americans, Muslim Americans and other individuals or groups that are perceived to be of Middle Eastern descent. Our message is consistent and clear -- no one should be singled out for hatred, prejudice or blame based on their ethnicity or religion. American unity and democracy is founded on this important ideal."''






===Criticism of the ADL===


Some have criticized the Anti-Defamation League for allegedly suppressing free speech and the right of ethnic minorities to defend themselves from bigotry (including Black Muslims and Arabs). (''What are the specifics of these alleged incidents?) Some have criticized the Anti-Defamation League for allegedly suppressing free speech and the right of ethnic minorities to defend themselves from bigotry (including Black Muslims and Arabs). (''What are the specifics of these alleged incidents?)


The ADL is also criticized for equating views critical of ]i policies with ], and thereby trying to stifle any discussion about Israeli policies.
The ADL was founded in 1918 in response to the lynching of Leo Frank in Georgia on a trumped up murder charge of killing Mary Phagan. Ironically, the Frank case, which eventually led to the establishment of the Anti-Defamation League, also resulted in the revival of the ], then known as the Knights of Mary Phagan


For example, ] wrote in his ] book '']'':
===Criticism of the ADL===

:''"The ADL has virtually abandoned its earlier role as a civil rights organization, becoming 'one of the main pillars' of Israeli propaganda in the U.S., as the Israeli press casually describes it, engaged in surveillance, blacklisting, compilation of FBI-style files circulated to adherents for the purpose of defamation, angry public responses to criticism of Israeli actions, and so on.''

:''"These efforts, buttressed by insinuations of ] or direct accusations, are intended to deflect or undermine opposition to Israeli policies, including Israel's refusal, with U.S. support, to move towards a general political settlement."''


Defenders of the ADL rebut these claims as follows:
The ADL is criticized for equating views critical of ]i policies with ], and thereby trying to stifle any discussion about Israeli policies.

Revision as of 16:56, 14 February 2003

The Anti-Defamation League (or ADL) of B'nai B'rith is an American organization founded in 1918 to fight anti-Semitism and bigotry.

Its formation was in response to the lynching of Leo Frank in Georgia on a trumped up murder charge of killing Mary Phagan. Ironically, the Frank case, which eventually led to the establishment of the Anti-Defamation League, also resulted in the revival of the Ku Klux Klan, then known as "the Knights of Mary Phagan".

With an annual budget of over $40 million, the ADL now has 29 offices domestically and 3 offices abroad. Increasingly, the ADL agenda has been turned towards pro-Israel activism. This has brought up the issue of where legitimate support for Israel ends and unacceptable suppression of pro-Palestinian viewpoints begins.

Although the Anti-Defamation League has not worked together with Arab-American and Muslim-American civil rights group (owing to disagreement concerning the Israeli-Palestine conflict), the Anti-Defamation League has on numerous occasions publicly condemned slurs against Islam.

The ADL website notes that:

"In the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks against America, ADL has responded to numerous incidents of violence and harassment against Arab Americans, Muslim Americans and other individuals or groups that are perceived to be of Middle Eastern descent. Our message is consistent and clear -- no one should be singled out for hatred, prejudice or blame based on their ethnicity or religion. American unity and democracy is founded on this important ideal."

ADL Responds to Violence and Harassment against Arab Americans and Muslim Americans

ADL Condemns Hate Literature Distribution at Honolulu Mosque


Criticism of the ADL

Some have criticized the Anti-Defamation League for allegedly suppressing free speech and the right of ethnic minorities to defend themselves from bigotry (including Black Muslims and Arabs). (What are the specifics of these alleged incidents?)

The ADL is also criticized for equating views critical of Israeli policies with anti-semitism, and thereby trying to stifle any discussion about Israeli policies.

For example, Noam Chomsky wrote in his 1989 book Necessary Illusions:

"The ADL has virtually abandoned its earlier role as a civil rights organization, becoming 'one of the main pillars' of Israeli propaganda in the U.S., as the Israeli press casually describes it, engaged in surveillance, blacklisting, compilation of FBI-style files circulated to adherents for the purpose of defamation, angry public responses to criticism of Israeli actions, and so on.
"These efforts, buttressed by insinuations of anti-Semitism or direct accusations, are intended to deflect or undermine opposition to Israeli policies, including Israel's refusal, with U.S. support, to move towards a general political settlement."

Defenders of the ADL rebut these claims as follows: