| Revision as of 16:00, 17 August 2004 edit65.30.121.64 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:39, 17 August 2004 edit undoFeloniousMonk (talk | contribs)18,409 edits rv to last version by Maximus Rex. 65.30.121.64 - register if you intend to edit. Also protoscience was included in the correct list.Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| '''Fringe science''' is a phrase used to describe |
'''Fringe science''' is a phrase used to describe scientific inquiry in an established field that departs significantly from mainstream or orthodox theories. | ||
| Fringe science can be distinguished from some similar sounding, but pejorative in nature, categories as follows |
Fringe science can be distinguished from some similar sounding, but pejorative in nature, categories as follows. | ||
| * |
*] - Pseudoscience is notoriously lax in rigorous application of the scientific method. Reproducability is typically a problem. This is not so in fringe science. | ||
| * |
*] - Junk science is used to describe agenda-driven research that ignores certain standard methodologies and practices in an attempt to secure a given result from an experiment. Fringe science, as in standard methodology, proceeds from theory to conclusion with no attempt to direct or coax the result. | ||
| *] - A protoscience is a field of inquiry which is not yet considered a real "science", but which nevertheless bears some resemblance to the norms of the scientific method. Fringe science is, by definition, at the fringes of an already accepted discipline. | |||
| * |
*] - Bad science might more properly be labelled "poor science" in that it is typically characterized by substandard or "sloppy" methodology. Fringe science maintains the normal standards of methodology. | ||
| Fringe science is, simply, real scientific inquiry that is on the edges of mainstream and widely-accepted theories. Fringe science is seen by most scientists as unlikely but not |
Fringe science is, simply, real scientific inquiry that is on the edges of mainstream and widely-accepted theories. Fringe science is seen by most scientists as unlikely but not irrational: many of today's most widely-held theories had their origins as fringe science. As with all categories, disagreement is widespread regarding what ideas are legitimate fringe science, and what ideas belong to the other four categories listed above. Traditionally, the term "fringe science" is generally used to describe unusual or fantastic theories that have their basis in some established scientific principle, and which are advocated by a published (or somehow recognized) mainstream scientist. | ||
| As with all categories, disagreement is widespread regarding what ideas are legitimate fringe science, and what ideas belong to the other categories listed above. Traditionally, the term "fringe science" is generally used to describe unusual or fantastic theories that have their basis in some established ], and which are advocated by a published (or somehow recognized) mainstream scientist. | |||
| == See also == | == See also == | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| *] | |||
| ] | ] | ||
Revision as of 16:39, 17 August 2004
Fringe science is a phrase used to describe scientific inquiry in an established field that departs significantly from mainstream or orthodox theories.
Fringe science can be distinguished from some similar sounding, but pejorative in nature, categories as follows.
- Pseudoscience - Pseudoscience is notoriously lax in rigorous application of the scientific method. Reproducability is typically a problem. This is not so in fringe science.
- Junk science - Junk science is used to describe agenda-driven research that ignores certain standard methodologies and practices in an attempt to secure a given result from an experiment. Fringe science, as in standard methodology, proceeds from theory to conclusion with no attempt to direct or coax the result.
- Protoscience - A protoscience is a field of inquiry which is not yet considered a real "science", but which nevertheless bears some resemblance to the norms of the scientific method. Fringe science is, by definition, at the fringes of an already accepted discipline.
- Bad science - Bad science might more properly be labelled "poor science" in that it is typically characterized by substandard or "sloppy" methodology. Fringe science maintains the normal standards of methodology.
Fringe science is, simply, real scientific inquiry that is on the edges of mainstream and widely-accepted theories. Fringe science is seen by most scientists as unlikely but not irrational: many of today's most widely-held theories had their origins as fringe science. As with all categories, disagreement is widespread regarding what ideas are legitimate fringe science, and what ideas belong to the other four categories listed above. Traditionally, the term "fringe science" is generally used to describe unusual or fantastic theories that have their basis in some established scientific principle, and which are advocated by a published (or somehow recognized) mainstream scientist.