| Revision as of 05:25, 4 July 2015 editThe Banner (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers124,791 edits Undid revision 669877362 by Handpolk (talk) not while the case is on WP;SPI← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:27, 4 July 2015 edit undoHandpolk (talk | contribs)1,588 edits Undid revision 669877440 by The Banner (talk) going to SPI does not give you a free pass to make baseless accusationsNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 04:53, 3 July 2015 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 04:53, 3 July 2015 (UTC)</small> | ||
| :::Thanks! If there's no longer consensus on that issue, then I'm over on delete. | :::Thanks! If there's no longer consensus on that issue, then I'm over on delete. | ||
| *'''Speedy keep'''. Nominator is virtually certain to be nine-time banned ]. Article was previously '''snow keep''' ] when this banned user previously nominated it. The article has two references from the New York Times, one from the San Francisco Chronicle, one from the largest poker site in the world, and others from reliable poker sources like Cardplayer magazine. ] (]) 03:19, 4 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:27, 4 July 2015
Steve Badger (poker player)
AfDs for this article:- Steve Badger (poker player) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Completing nomintion on another editor's behalf, i have no opnion on the merits DES 03:09, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
I nominated. Not notable. Winning a preliminary event at the WSOP does not meet the requirement for notability per WP:BLP1E. He has done nothing else notable, the rest of the article is fluff. There are what seem like three RS's but each simply says he won a tournament and then quotes his opinion on random stuff. We already knew he won the tournament and we know one event doesn't make you notable -- even if 3 RS's confirm you won it. Handpolk ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 03:28, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
*Weak Keep*Delete He fits under Wikiproject:Poker essay for notability and while that's just an essay, he did win a very significant event and is a bracelet winner. There are just enough references in which he's sought out for poker expertise by reliable sources that I'm barely on this side of the line. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 04:28, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
- FYI that essay is out of date. There is unanimous agreement on the project talk page for no longer automatically considering bracelet winners notable. Who exactly to consider notable we haven't agreed on yet. Handpolk ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 05:40, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America 04:53, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America 04:53, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks! If there's no longer consensus on that issue, then I'm over on delete.