| Revision as of 13:26, 4 July 2015 view sourceBishonen (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators80,260 edits You have been blocked from editing. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:06, 4 July 2015 view source Handpolk (talk | contribs)1,588 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
| == July 2015 == | == July 2015 == | ||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''48 hours''' for disruptive editing, comprising giving out harassing and meritless "vandalism" warnings and then edit warring to keep them on the page, at ] and ]. I note the warning above has had as little effect as the other warnings you've received for this behaviour. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by first reading the ], then adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. ] | ] 13:26, 4 July 2015 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block --> | <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''48 hours''' for disruptive editing, comprising giving out harassing and meritless "vandalism" warnings and then edit warring to keep them on the page, at ] and ]. I note the warning above has had as little effect as the other warnings you've received for this behaviour. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by first reading the ], then adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. ] | ] 13:26, 4 July 2015 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block --> | ||
| :I give out warnings and they are 'meritless' and I get blocked for giving them out, yet others give me warnings and I'm supposed to heed them? TheGracefulSlick vandalized my talk page by blanking prior discussion with a trolling edit summary. The Banner did the same thing on another talk page. I warned them for this. The 'edit warring' you reference was I believe a single revert and definitely not 3 of them. ] ] 14:05, 4 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:06, 4 July 2015
Fine work
Hi Handpolk, just wanted to mention I'm glad to see the earnest work you're doing in the areas you're editing in now, although do consider that the advice you've been getting from the experienced editors there may be good to take. Regarding the Invitation section above, you should feel free to remove the section from your User Talk if you'd like. Zad68 14:57, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks. I gather you mean Statue of Liberty? Dealing with conflict is not my strong suit. The topic ban is probably for the best. Handpolk (talk) 15:11, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Misplaced Talk Message
Everytime he trades a player do we put it on his wikipedia? Or even when he attempts or wants to? Cause he also wants to trade Rudy Gay and there's no way they are trading Cousins. So why don't we write about whrn he wanted to trade igoudala in 2007 and when he traded JR Smith or Carmelo Anthony? How does Cousins differ from that and how is it important that he wants to trade him? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Toeknee44 (talk • contribs) 19:43, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
- I would have no problem with you adding any of those things, particularly the Carmelo Anthony trade. Theoretically any time a reliable source writes about him, that's a candidate for inclusion in the article. Are you aware of any policy or guideline that says otherwise? Because your objections seem based on your own original research (i.e. knowledge of basketball). And that doesn't factor into the editing process. Handpolk (talk) 20:07, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
- FYI. This was left on your User page, I've moved it here and signed it. — Strongjam (talk) 19:46, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
- That was very kind of you. Handpolk (talk) 20:13, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
I try to be helpful. — Strongjam (talk) 20:17, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
- That was very kind of you. Handpolk (talk) 20:13, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Golden State Warriors
Sorry, but you're wrong. Your edit is vandalism. That sentence The Warriors are the current NBA champions, defeating the Cleveland Cavaliers in six games in the 2015 Finals. is IRRELEVANT. And I will continue to REVERT this edit, because that has no place there! Sabbatino (talk) 12:53, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- I made some research and that edit was made on JUNE 17 and it's irrelevant. Here's that revision's info - 07:01, 17 June 2015 DavidSteinle (talk | contribs) . . (69,160 bytes) (+169). I wonder how noone saw that garbage sooner. You can report me, but I'm right by reverting that edit. Sabbatino (talk) 13:05, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- You seriously think it's irrelevant they are the current NBA Champions? Is that some sort of joke? Handpolk ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:22, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- I added this to the talk page. I don't anticipate it will take long for consensus to collectively laugh at you, as I have. Maybe you should go to Barack Obama and remove that he is President of the United States, you probably think that's irrelevant, too. Handpolk ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:31, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- You clearly don't understand why that idiotic statement has no place in there. And everyone will laugh at you when there's a consensus. And why I should do something to Obama's article? Don't start an argument which you will lose. Sabbatino (talk) 13:34, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- You're right, I don't have any idea why that 'idiotic' statement has no place in there. And you've yet to explain why in a way that makes me understand. Let's move this to the article talk page. Handpolk ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:42, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- You clearly don't understand why that idiotic statement has no place in there. And everyone will laugh at you when there's a consensus. And why I should do something to Obama's article? Don't start an argument which you will lose. Sabbatino (talk) 13:34, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- I added this to the talk page. I don't anticipate it will take long for consensus to collectively laugh at you, as I have. Maybe you should go to Barack Obama and remove that he is President of the United States, you probably think that's irrelevant, too. Handpolk ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:31, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- You seriously think it's irrelevant they are the current NBA Champions? Is that some sort of joke? Handpolk ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:22, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Arbitration appeal
Hey. There's a template here for appealing arbitration enforcement sanctions. You may wish to reformat your request- alternatively, I'll do it for you if you'd like? PeterTheFourth has made few or no other edits outside this topic. 09:15, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
- If you can do it i'd appreciate it. Handpolk ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 09:34, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
- Embarassing- GoldenRing had already generously done it. Anyway, it's good now. PeterTheFourth has made few or no other edits outside this topic. 09:47, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
- No problem. GoldenRing (talk) 09:49, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
- Embarassing- GoldenRing had already generously done it. Anyway, it's good now. PeterTheFourth has made few or no other edits outside this topic. 09:47, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
RfA
A bit of bedtime reading for you. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:59, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
- "This essay contains the advice or opinions of one or more Misplaced Pages contributors" -- like I disagreed with your opinion, I disagree with theirs. Handpolk ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:26, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Please stop
Stop giving out warnings to people for no reason. If you truly are not a sock, you are not helping your cause by attacking other users.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 11:17, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
- I have never given out a warning for no reason. Yet a user is viciously attacking me all over Misplaced Pages and here you are accusing me of attacks for giving them a warning. Handpolk ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:06, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
July 2015
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 13:26, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
- I give out warnings and they are 'meritless' and I get blocked for giving them out, yet others give me warnings and I'm supposed to heed them? TheGracefulSlick vandalized my talk page by blanking prior discussion with a trolling edit summary. The Banner did the same thing on another talk page. I warned them for this. The 'edit warring' you reference was I believe a single revert and definitely not 3 of them. Handpolk ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:05, 4 July 2015 (UTC)