Misplaced Pages

User talk:Mythologia: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:45, 2 August 2006 editMythologia (talk | contribs)522 edits Which do you want to keep?← Previous edit Revision as of 07:55, 2 August 2006 edit undoMythologia (talk | contribs)522 edits Which do you want to keep?Next edit →
Line 104: Line 104:


:>日本穣 I am not the Shougiku Wine. So I'm main. But I think that he also will be main. So I think the CU will be needed for his credit and mine. But I know it is not your task,I will ask to retest of checkuser to administration. thanks ] 00:29, 2 August 2006 (UTC) :>日本穣 I am not the Shougiku Wine. So I'm main. But I think that he also will be main. So I think the CU will be needed for his credit and mine. But I know it is not your task,I will ask to retest of checkuser to administration. thanks ] 00:29, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

:>日本穣 (and administrators ) I wonder why I was baned because I isn't Shougiku Wine. It will be clear to check the IP's minutely. And I want to say that I didn't have reason to use a sockpuppet, because Shougiku Wine and me have differnt opinion about the article of ]. Please see the note of the artcle again,] which was probably read by administrator. ] 07:55, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:55, 2 August 2006

Welcome!

Hello, Mythologia, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  TomStar81 04:50, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Japan

Please do not delete content in Japan without discussing it in Talk:Japan. Blanket deletion of content without justification is considered vandalism. Thank you.--Sir Edgar 04:47, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

It is your problem >Sir Edgar. I recommend you to hold the rule which you write.Mythologia 03:55, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Civility and Etiquette

Kindly avoid throwing insults or accusations at other Wikipedians who are trying to help. Please see Misplaced Pages:Civility and Misplaced Pages:Etiquette. Thank you.--Sir Edgar 06:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

I support Kamosuke edits. Your last talk edit is 02:20, 22 June 2006 Sir Edgar. "Please do not delete content in Japan without discussing it in Talk:Japan. Blanket deletion of content without justification is considered vandalism. Thank you.". Or as you wrote below.Mythologia 07:12, 26 June 2006 (UTC).
Do not repeat messages you post here on my Talk page. That is not necessary.--Sir Edgar 07:59, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
It is your problem >Sir Edgar. I recommend you to hold the rule which you write.Mythologia 02:13, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Civility and Etiquette

Kindly avoid throwing insults or accusations at other Wikipedians who are trying to help. Please see Misplaced Pages:Civility and Misplaced Pages:Etiquette.--Mythologia 07:12, 26 June 2006 (UTC).

This is for you.>Sir Edgar. Please do not alter the text. Mythologia 08:08, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
You sound like a parrot.--Sir Edgar 22:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
See yourself. I recommend you to hold the rule which you write. Mythologia 01:56, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Please be kind

Please read Misplaced Pages:Civility and Misplaced Pages:Etiquette.

I don't think you are being kind and polite in the Misplaced Pages discussions. I'm not saying I'm perfect, but we need to try and create a more civil atmosphere in the talk pages. Even if you are not being rude, I don't think you are being nice either. Please be more polite. This is Misplaced Pages, not a war. Thanks Good friend100 15:37, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Hi >friend100 I don't think you are being kind and polite in the Misplaced Pages discussions, too. But I think it is no problem. To make clear explation is need when we discuss about the fact. Let's talk clear about the fact. By the way your talk page isn't broken? Take care of it. Mythologia 16:07, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Kindness and politeness should be addressed to everyone. You are right about facts. The problem is, facts are disputed between parties.
I don't understand what you mean by "broken".
The relations are strained between the two parties concerning Korea-Japan disputes. Its not going to be easy compromising but I'm still hopeful. Good friend100 02:14, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
I'm hopeful too. >Good friend100. This type of relation is common in the world. But Let me make a point. I think that who is confident in himself behaves modestly. I hope you will be like so. Mythologia 09:05, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

I agree. Feeling inferior to others makes one to behave badly.

But being confident in yourself or what you represent makes you (i.e your home country) want to protect yourself and your representation. That causes you to fight for yourself or your representation, especially when the opposite side plays nasty or uses inappropiate words. Good friend100 22:49, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

I don't hope you not to fight, but to fight with modesty. I hope myself to do so, otherwise we can't confirm who or what are real opponents.Mythologia 00:18, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
The fighting at the Dokdo talk page is too politically based. The opponents are clear. Its just that modesty cannot always represent what you wish to message to others. Good friend100 01:50, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
I don't think so. I think that you will know it sooner or later. Mythologia 02:19, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Gratitude

I hereby award this Working Man's Barnstar to Mythologia for tireless and endless work on fixing Japan-related articles--Questionfromjapan 11:34, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your honorable mention. I will take it a step at a time. Mythologia 12:21, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

3RR Warning

You have been warned about Misplaced Pages:Three-revert rule. Please discuss before undoing other editors' contributions and prior compromises. Dollarfifty 00:37, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Which edit was I warned of ? Mythologia 01:00, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Please read the cited references

On your multiple reverts for the Japan article, it appears as if you are not reading the cited references. Although, one source did state Korean Peninsula, all the other sources stated Korea. In addition, all the sources stated Korea as being the main source of technology and some of the sources stated to a lesser extent China as a source. The DNA information is only relevent for rice cultivation which is thought to be from Southeast Asia (which included what is now South China). Also please use English references for the English version of wikipedia. Thanks. --Tyler 13:23, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Please read discussion of the article. All of your questions have been answered clearly. Mythologia 13:56, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

It is not acceptable to delete content from Misplaced Pages simply because you disagree it. If you continue to blank content for no good reason (like you did to Kimi ga Yo), you will end up being blocked. Instead of wasting your time and everyone else's, why don't you find something more constructive to do instead? -- Sakurambo 桜ん坊 20:01, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

I didn't delete it because I am disagree it, but because it was not the truth. I don't oppose to write the content if it was truth. But to tell the truth I don't know any type of parody of Kimi ga Yo whereas I know the song is contestable. If you want to write the content, you mustn't misrepresent the facts of the content.Mythologia 21:53, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Not the truth? This story was reported by the Sankei Shimbun, the Guardian, the Korea Times, Independent Online, Reuters and other news organizations. Are you suggesting they all made this story up? Do you really think anyone is going to believe you? -- Sakurambo 桜ん坊 23:43, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
It was overbroad of incidence that the parodies have spread. See discussion of the article. Mythologia 23:53, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Template:Sockpuppeteerproven


This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Mythologia (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please provide a reason as to why you should be unblocked.
Change {{unblock}} to {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}}

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=original unblock reason |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

>Nihonje I have written what I want to say about being suspected as sock.


Using Same computer? Please retest IP's of Shougiku Win and me. I have never used my computer with others. I'm contracting with huge Internet provider and it assignes IP addresses dynamically. It will be easy to know that I am assigned IP addresses dynamically if you check my IP's. So if using same provider, it very occasionally occers that different people use same IP's in diffrent time. But it never occers different people use same IP in the same time because it assignes IP address individually. Mythologia 05:45, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

I have read some of Shougiku Win's edits, in fact I had not read his edits yet. And I think he and me are very different in style. I don't have a faculty to use 2 type of writing styles. Mythologia 07:33, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

I want to retest of IP's. But I know it is not your task >Nihonje. If you can requset it please write here. Or I will request it to administrators. Mythologia 16:12, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Which do you want to keep?

Please indicate which of your two accounts you'd like to keep (Mythologia or Shougiku Wine) and I'll unblock the one you wish to keep. Thanks! ···日本穣 22:05, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

>日本穣 I am not the Shougiku Wine. So I'm main. But I think that he also will be main. So I think the CU will be needed for his credit and mine. But I know it is not your task,I will ask to retest of checkuser to administration. thanks Mythologia 00:29, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
>日本穣 (and administrators ) I wonder why I was baned because I isn't Shougiku Wine. It will be clear to check the IP's minutely. And I want to say that I didn't have reason to use a sockpuppet, because Shougiku Wine and me have differnt opinion about the article of Kimi ga Yo. Please see the note of the artcle again,Talk:Kimi_ga_Yo which was probably read by administrator. Mythologia 07:55, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
Categories: