Misplaced Pages

User talk:Dubs boy: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:17, 20 July 2015 editText Julian (talk | contribs)24 edits →Harassment on my talk page← Previous edit Revision as of 14:36, 21 July 2015 edit undoDubs boy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users534 edits →Harassment on my talk pageNext edit →
Line 28: Line 28:


These guys seem quite determined to block all opposition to their agenda. I don't know what that editor means by 'opened ani' but it is so indirect and avoiding of the important issues, that it must surely be a threat to comply. ] (]) 22:17, 20 July 2015 (UTC) These guys seem quite determined to block all opposition to their agenda. I don't know what that editor means by 'opened ani' but it is so indirect and avoiding of the important issues, that it must surely be a threat to comply. ] (]) 22:17, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

:They want blood. They are happy to turn a blind eye to the actions of users on "their side". Its disappointing that they are so set on a battle ground mentality. A belated welcome to wikipedia none the less.] (]) 14:36, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:36, 21 July 2015

Harassment on my talk page

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Harassment on my talk page. Thank you. Scolaire (talk) 17:16, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

ScolaireWhatever happened to this incident?Dubs boy (talk) 18:41, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
Are you trying to force me to post on your talk page? Scolaire (talk) 20:24, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
I cant make you do anything you don't want to. I'm just wondering what happened to the ANI?
I was just having a laugh. The thread was archived, because the admins weren't interested. Scolaire (talk) 08:30, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
So you tried to get me blocked, for a laugh? I think next time you go to ANI, try and present the facts and not a skewed mock up of events. I thought it was weird that Highking came out of no where to support your comments, having not edited in 3 months. What is the link between you and Highking?Dubs boy (talk) 14:37, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Boy, you really work hard at getting things wrong! I said "Are you trying to force me to post on your talk page" for a laugh. I didn't take you to ANI for a laugh. I was seriously pissed off at the way you kept bugging me. I'm not going to get into whether I presented the facts correctly or not. (talk) 22:58, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Your last statement says it all. "Facts" were noticeably ignored in an attempt to get me blocked. As i presented, it was you who was actually bugging me. Trying to get another user blocked is no laughing matter. I think you have shown your true colours and POV.Dubs boy (talk) 19:30, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
: There is no "link" between me and HighKing. We haven't interacted for a long time. When we did, we disagreed at least as often as we agreed. I assume he posted on the article talk page because he had something to say, and he posted on ANI because he had something to say there, too.
Now, if you don't mind, I don't want to have any more discussion with you. Goodbye and happy editing. Scolaire (talk) 22:58, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Something smells a bit off.Dubs boy (talk) 19:30, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
Goodbye and happy editing. Scolaire (talk) 23:20, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Dubs Boy, it's because I forgot my pass word. so I had to start again. Text Julian (talk) 21:19, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

That makes sense. Nothing to worry about then. Common sense should prevail, though this is wikipedia where common sense is considered contrabandDubs boy (talk) 21:21, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

These guys seem quite determined to block all opposition to their agenda. I don't know what that editor means by 'opened ani' but it is so indirect and avoiding of the important issues, that it must surely be a threat to comply. Text Julian (talk) 22:17, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

They want blood. They are happy to turn a blind eye to the actions of users on "their side". Its disappointing that they are so set on a battle ground mentality. A belated welcome to wikipedia none the less.Dubs boy (talk) 14:36, 21 July 2015 (UTC)