| Revision as of 19:51, 2 August 2006 view sourceRyulong (talk | contribs)218,132 edits →RE: []← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:53, 2 August 2006 view source Ryulong (talk | contribs)218,132 edits archiving some stuffNext edit → | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| When I find that the conversations or issues discussed here have either ended or resolved, they will be inserted into my archives, at my own discretion. --] | When I find that the conversations or issues discussed here have either ended or resolved, they will be inserted into my archives, at my own discretion. --] | ||
| <div style="clear: both"></div> | <div style="clear: both"></div> | ||
| ==Re: Habbo Raids== | |||
| I can understand the verifiability problem; that's why I linked to a video of an incident in progress (which verifies that raids happen and that they're from 4chan) as well as a screenshot that also proves they happen. My understanding is that the 4chan Habbo raids are similar in notability as the various GNAA attacks. Even more so than GNAA, in fact, because the Habbo raids involved the mass mobilization of a large body of people. Would forum posts from Habbo itself about the raids provide verifiability (especially as mods posted on the raids' impact on the servers)? My interest here is documenting what appears to be a surprisingly structured and coordinated attack from a group of people who pride themselves on being random. It also provides evidence that /b/ might be more than just an image board, which is interesting from a social science post of view. Also, the raids did impact the online experience of many people. What do you think? (And feel free to reply here or on my talk page.) ] 03:47, 2 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :The problem does not exist in the verifiability problem, perse, but more of the fact that such raids don't really need to be mentioned in a serious encyclopedia that Misplaced Pages is striving to be. There have been long discussions about whether or not to include them in ] and ] and both discussions have unequivocally stated that such information is not for Misplaced Pages, despite the wishes of /b/tards everywhere. ] 03:51, 2 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == RE: ] == | |||
| Thanks for the tip on the where the hangon goes... I am sort of new at this. {{unsigned|VelvetGeisha}} | |||
| :No problem. ] 09:48, 2 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::May I ask what makes habbo hotel and anime/manga so much more worth writing about that a actress/model? Just wonder. {{unsigned|VelvetGeisha}} | |||
| :::Because they are internationally renowned and this model you are writing about is not. ] 19:51, 2 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Rabbit starvation == | |||
| Hi, Ryulong. It looks like you replaced the original disputed text in the ] article, that had been removed by the author. I'm not sure what the usual procedure is with pages that need a rewrite, but shouldn't the author's removal of copyrighted material stand? Regards, --] 10:34, 2 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Hadoken == | |||
| SHINKYU-HAAAAAAAADOOOOOOOOOOKEEEEEEEEEN!!! | |||
Revision as of 19:53, 2 August 2006
Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.
 Archives |
|---|
When I find that the conversations or issues discussed here have either ended or resolved, they will be inserted into my archives, at my own discretion. --Ryūlóng