| Revision as of 02:21, 30 July 2015 edit107.107.187.11 (talk)No edit summaryTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:21, 30 July 2015 edit undo107.107.187.11 (talk)No edit summaryTags: possible vandalism Mobile edit Mobile web editNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| gabriela cuellar | |||
| ==Sysop prerogative== | |||
| Sysop prerogative is a legal concept used to understand which powers belong to a systems operator and which do not. It states that a sysop has the prerogative to make any rules they choose providing they have not given the right to do so by contract and that legislation in the country they are in permits and does not prohibit the rule they want to make.<ref name="allswell">Bishop, J. (2011). "All’s WELL that ends WELL: A comparative analysis of the Constitutional and Administrative Frameworks of Cyberspace and the United Kingdom". In: A. Dudley-Sponaugle & J. Braman (Eds). ''Investigating Cyber Law and Cyber Ethics: Issues, Impacts and Practices''. IGI Global: New York, NY.</ref><ref name="artoftrolling">Bishop, J. (2013). The Art of Trolling Law Enforcement: A Review and Model for implementing ‘flame trolling’ legislation enacted in Great Britain (1981-2012), International Review of Law, Computers and Technology 27(3), 301-318.</ref><ref name="mumsthewordpress">Bishop, J. (2011). Mum’s the WordPress: A Comparative Analysis of Political and Mommy Bloggers. In Hamid R. Arabnia; Victor A. Clincy & Ashu M. G. Solo (Eds.) Proceedings of The 2011 Internet Conference on Internet Computing (ICOMP’2011). July 18–21, 2011. Las Vegas Nevada, USA.</ref> Under sysop prerogative, if a term in the website's rules says that the copyright in the posted content belongs to the poster, then the systems operator cannot then make it their copyright without the user agreeing first, under ].<ref name="allswell" /><ref name="artoftrolling" /><ref name="mumsthewordpress" /> | |||
| ==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Revision as of 02:21, 30 July 2015
gabriela cuellar