| Revision as of 22:54, 11 August 2015 editS Marshall (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers32,385 edits Thank you← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:59, 11 August 2015 edit undoLevelledout (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,042 edits Archiving discussionNext edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| The ] is asking for participation in ]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 30834 --> ] (]) 00:02, 7 August 2015 (UTC) | The ] is asking for participation in ]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 30834 --> ] (]) 00:02, 7 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
| == Word and evidence limit == | |||
| Hi, Levelledout. I'm here to ask you to withdraw your objection to an increased word and diff limit for QuackGuru. Everyone else involved, including you, will be able to develop a clear and coherent case in a few hundred words and a couple of dozen well-chosen diffs. QG will not be able to do this. He will make a case the way he writes an article: with hundreds of carefully-cited quotes grouped by topic, beautifully accurate but hopelessly unclear because there will be no thesis, no clear starting point and no conclusions. I think the arbs will emerge from reading 1,500 words of QG's prose with no great insight into his mind but a much keener appreciation for the problems we experience in dealing with him.—] <small>]/]</small> 21:52, 11 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :@] You have a point. I will withdraw part of my complaint and leave it down to the arbs to decide, who will have to read through the resultant sprawling mess. I maintain that all editors should have a level playing field though.] (]) 22:49, 11 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thank you. I think that this ''does'' maintain a level playing field ---- QG is allowed extra words to compensate for special needs.—] <small>]/]</small> 22:54, 11 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:59, 11 August 2015
| Archives | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Please comment on Talk:The Pirate Bay
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Pirate Bay. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom case "Editor conduct in e-cigs articles" has now been opened
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Editor conduct in e-cigs articles. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Editor conduct in e-cigs articles/Evidence. Please add your evidence by August 18, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Editor conduct in e-cigs articles/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Lankiveil 11:21, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Plant-based diet
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Plant-based diet. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 7 August 2015 (UTC)